Skip to content

· Private foundation

A G Cox Charity Trust Xxxxx9001

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.6M
Granted FY2025still arriving
55
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$2.6MEducation$1.2MHuman Services$904kPublic Safety & Disaster$795kArts & Culture$685kYouth Development$610kEnvironment$415kFood & Nutrition$280kOther$0
02FY2025 · 55 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k41 grants · $774k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $530k
  • $250k+1 grant · $250k
$17,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD$250,000
RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER$125,000
SALVATION ARMY CHICAGO$90,244
ANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS$80,000
Individual grant recipient$75,000
MAYO FOUNDATION CANCER$60,000
EVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION$50,000
DUKE UNIVERSITY$50,000
SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB$45,000
Yerkes Future Foundation Inc$40,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$40,000
NIGHT MINISTRY$30,000
Goodwill Industries of Metropolitan$30,000
Individual grant recipient$30,000
GENEVA LAKE WATER SAFETY PATROL$30,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $415k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $25k → 14%LIFELINE PILOTS INC: $15k → 14%Lifeline Pilots Inc: $15k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $15k → 14%Christopher House: $15k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $15k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $15k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $15k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $15k → 14%CHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $15k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $15k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $10k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $10k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $10k → 14%CAMP KESEM: $5k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $30k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $25k → 14%Night Ministry: $10k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%NIGHT MINISTRY: $10k → 14%CHICAGO CHILD CARE SOCIETY: $15k → 14%CHICAGO CHILD CARE SOCIETY: $15k → 14%CHICAGO CHILD CARE SOCIETY: $15k → 14%FAMILY FOCUS: $15k → 14%CHICAGO CHILD CARE SOCIETY: $15k → 14%Chicago Child Care Society: $15k → 14%Voices for Illinois Children Inc: $5k → 14%VOICES FOR ILLINOIS CHILDREN INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$11M · 78 repeat orgs$125k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

78 repeat relationships: 53 still active in FY2025, 25 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

78
4

Total granted

$11M
$115k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
0%

Still filing today

64%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthArts & CultureEnvironmentYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RU
    Rush University Medical Center
    8× · 2018–2025 · $860k · revenue +39%
  • GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY
    8× · 2018–2025 · $530k · revenue +97%
  • RI
    Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago
    8× · 2018–2025 · $405k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • FO
    FRIENDS OF THE LAKE GENEVA PUBLIC LIBRARY INC
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • UW
    USC WRIGLEY INSTITUTE FOR ENVIRONMENT
    one grant, 2023 · $50k
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY OF MONTEREY COUNTY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chicago Psychoanalytic Institute

The chicago psychoanalytic institute transforms the lives of individuals, families and communities, using psychoanalytic knowledge to help them grow and thrive.

Social Science
2
Pediatric Faculty Foundation Inc

We value excellence and innovation in clinical and basic research, coordinated and comprehensive patient care, ongoing physician education, and evidence-based child advocacy. our goal is to provide leadership in endeavors that promote the…

Health
3
Lake Forest Graduate School of Management

Lake Forest Graduate School of Management's mission is to bring the real world to business education and leadership development.

—
4
Lake Forest College

Provide post-secondary education leading to a baccalaureate degree. Program service expenditures are made in conjunction with the operation of a liberal arts college spread over 107 acres with approximately 63 educational and support…

Education
5
The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

The Chicago School educates the next generation of change-makers in innovative theory and culturally competent practice to strengthen the integrated health of individuals, organizations, and communities.

Education
6
The University of Chicago Charter School Corporation

To Prepare Students for Success in Four-Year Colleges.

Education
7
Lurie Children's Surgical Foundation Inc

Provide pediatric and subspecialty surgical, research, and educational services.

—
8
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
9
Children's Museum of Illinois

The operation of a children's museum.

Arts & Culture
10
Chicago Historical Society

The Chicago History Museum strives to be a destination for learning, inspiration, and civic engagement. Through dynamic exhibitions, tours, programs, digital resources, and special events, the Museum connects people to Chicago's history…

Arts & Culture
11
Uchicago Medicine Network Inc

Uchicago medicine network, inc. supports and encourages health and human service by providing support, directly or indirectly to ingalls memorial hospital, the university of chicago medical center, and other related tax-exempt…

Health
12
Saint Xavier University

Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chicago Youth Centers; the most unlike its peers is Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

54 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 54 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/54
Grantees still filing
42/54
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY CHICAGO: $674,554 · OtherSALVATION ARMY CHICAGOIndividual grant recipient: $575,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $540,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENS: $520,000 · OtherANN & ROBERT H LURIE CHILDRENSMAYO FOUNDATION CANCER: $410,000 · OtherMAYO FOUNDATION CANCEREVANS SCHOLARS FOUNDATION: $315,000 · Other+48 more: $3,910,000 · Other+48 moreRush University Medical Center: $860,000 · HealthRush University…Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $405,000 · HealthRehabilitation …MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION: $110,000 · HealthMERCY HEALTH SY…LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $100,000 · HealthLUCILE PACKARD …Phoenix Children's Hospital: $90,000 · HealthPhoenix Childre…UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $330,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…YERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC: $190,000 · EducationYERKES FUT…Catalina Island Museum: $185,000 · EducationCatalina I…HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $170,000 · EducationHADLEY INS…DUKE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 · EducationDUKE UNIVE…LADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM): $45,000 · Education+4 more: $67,000 · Education+4 moreGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $530,000 · Food & NutritionCHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $130,000 · Human ServicesTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $105,000 · Human ServicesFamily Focus: $90,000 · Human ServicesCamp Kesem National: $50,000 · Human ServicesLIFELINE INC: $30,000 · Human Services+1 more: $10,000 · Human ServicesCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $225,000 · EnvironmentGENEVA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $90,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF KISHWAUKETOE: $45,000 · EnvironmentGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $30,000 · EnvironmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $140,000 · Youth DevelopmentChicago Youth Centers: $125,000 · Youth DevelopmentOFF THE STREET CLUB: $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentPickles Group Inc: $20,000 · Youth Development
Other$6,944,554Health$1,565,000Education$1,087,000Food & Nutrition$530,000Human Services$415,000Environment$390,000Youth Development$345,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRush University Medical Center: $860,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $530,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetRehabilitation Institute of Chicago: $405,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $330,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY: $225,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS: $195,000 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetYERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC: $190,000 over 6y, 1.7% of budgetCatalina Island Museum: $185,000 over 8y, 1.7% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $170,000 over 8y, 3.9% of budgetHADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED: $170,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetPATHWAY TO ADVENTURE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA: $165,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetNorthwestern University: $160,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA LAKE MUSEUM INC: $145,000 over 8y, 12% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO: $140,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetINFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGO: $135,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetCHRISTOPHER HOUSE: $130,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetChicago Youth Centers: $125,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetFIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMERCY HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION: $110,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $105,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetDANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $105,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetDUKE UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetGENEVA LAKE ASSOCIATION INC: $90,000 over 8y, 13% of budgetPhoenix Children's Hospital: $90,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Focus: $90,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGENEVA AREA FOUNDATION INC HORTICULTURAL HALL: $80,000 over 8y, 5.9% of budgetOFF THE STREET CLUB: $60,000 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetLAKE GENEVA FRESH AIR ASSOCIATION INC: $60,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetTHE ADLER PLANETARIUM: $60,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSHEDD AQUARIUM SOCIETY: $55,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSANTA CATALINA ISLAND CONSERVANCY: $50,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChicago Foundation for Education: $50,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetCamp Kesem National: $50,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLADDER UP (F/K/A CITY-WIDE TAX ASSISTANCE PROGRAM): $45,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetBEARS CARE: $45,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF KISHWAUKETOE: $45,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetCHICAGO CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER: $40,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCURT'S CAFE: $40,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPREVENT CHILD ABUSE AMERICA: $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC: $35,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA LAKE CONSERVANCY INC: $30,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetSCOTTSDALE MUSEUM OF THE WEST INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ART INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO: $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetLIFELINE INC: $30,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetTHE TIME IS NOW TO HELP INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetPickles Group Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetKenneth C Griffin Museum of Science and Industry: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Rush University Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO HORTICULTURAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds THE 100 CLUB OF ILLINOIS ↗
  • Who funds YERKES FUTURE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Catalina Island Museum ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
  • Who funds HADLEY INSTITUTE FOR THE BLIND AND VISUALLY IMPAIRED ↗
  • Who funds PATHWAY TO ADVENTURE COUNCIL INC BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Northwestern University ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA LAKE MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds INFANT WELFARE SOCIETY OF CHICAGO ↗
  • Who funds CHRISTOPHER HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Chicago Youth Centers ↗
  • Who funds FIELD MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY ↗
  • Who funds MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds DANIEL MURPHY SCHOLARSHIP FUND ↗
  • Who funds DUKE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LUCILE PACKARD FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN'S HEALTH ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chicago Community TrustIL34.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chicago Community Trust · Dean L & Rosemarie Buntrock Foundation · Otzen Family Foundation Incorporated · Patrick G and Shirley W Ryan Foundation · Alben F & Clara G Bates Foundation · Dr Scholl Foundation · AbbVie Foundation · The Griffith Family Foundation · The John a Miller Family Foundation · The Anna Emery Hanson Charitable Foundation 1 · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Lavin Family Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A G Cox Charity Trust Xxxxx9001 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A G Cox Charity Trust Xxxxx9001. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 84 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on A G Cox Charity Trust Xxxxx9001’s filings →

    More from the funding graph