Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

A Blue Sky Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$245k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Environment$515kAnimals$115kScience & Tech$45kInternational$45kEducation$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k3 grants · $45k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REWILD$200,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC$25,000
THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER$10,000
ONE SPARK FOUNDATION INC$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY19–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 95% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ONE SPARK FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 10%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL: $5k → 11%NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL - LOS ANGELES REG: $50k → 14%FARM SANCTUARY INC: $35k → 12%NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $50k → 17%PEACEFUL VALLEY DONKEY RESCUE INC: $5k → 13%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $35k → 14%ONE SPARK FOUNDATION INC: $10k → 10%NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL - LOS ANGELES: $50k → 14%FARM SANCTUARY INC: $35k → 12%WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $5k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $25k → 14%NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL - LOS ANGELES REG: $40k → 14%FARM SANCTUARY INC: $30k → 12%WATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC: $5k → 17%WORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $25k → 14%HEAL THE BAY: $10k → 14%MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $25k → 17%GALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC: $5k → 14%THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER: $10k → 14%NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $25k → 14%COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR: $5k → 14%NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY: $20k → 14%COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR: $5k → 14%COALITION FOR CLEAN AIR: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$410k · 8 repeat orgs$335k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
6

Total granted

$410k
$125k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+34%

Still filing today

88%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $210k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsEducationHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FS
    FARM SANCTUARY INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $100k · revenue +7%
  • NG
    NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY
    2× · 2020–2024 · $45k · revenue +197%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $45k · revenue +1%

Funded once

  • NR
    NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL - LOS ANGELES
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +34%
  • HT
    HEAL THE BAY
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue -9%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Conservation International Foundation

Ci works to spotlight and secure the critical benefits that nature provides to humanity.

Environment
2
Ocean Conservancy

Ocean conservancy unites science, people, and policy to protect our ocean, today and for generations to come.

Environment
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Sustainable Conservation

Sustainable Conservation advances the collaborative stewardship of Californias land, air, and water for the benefit of nature and people. For over three decades, Sustainable Conservation has built coalitions of people with different…

Environment
5
Resource Renewal Institute

The resource renewal institute facilitates the creation, development and implementation of practical strategies to solve the entire complex environmental problem by addressing it comprehensively.

Environment
6
Environment Now
7
Friends of the Earth

Friends of the earth strives for a more healthy and just world by defendng the environment and human health while advancing social and economic justice by conducting research and education, transforming the economy so it protects the…

Environment
8
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
9
Wildlife Conservation Society

The wildlife conservation society (wcs) saves wildlife and wild places worldwide through science, conservation action, education, and inspiring people to value nature.

Animals
10
Defenders of Wildlife

Defenders of Wildlife is a national, nonprofit membership organization dedicated to the protection of all native animals and plants in their natural communities.

Animals
11
Sustainable Fisheries Partnership Foundation

To engage and catalyze global seafood supply chains in rebuilding depleted fish stocks and reducing the environmental impacts of fishing and fish farming.

Animals
12
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Farm Sanctuary Inc and the most unlike its peers is One Spark Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

REWILD — $200,000 · AnimalsREWILDFARM SANCTUARY INC — $100,000 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC+1 more — $5,000 · AnimalsWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $85,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INCNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $50,000 · EnvironmentNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE…Coalition for Clean Air — $15,000 · EnvironmentCoalition for Clean AirHEAL THE BAY — $10,000 · EnvironmentHEAL THE BAYWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 · EnvironmentWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INCNATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL - LOS ANGELES REG — $90,000 · OtherNATURAL RESOURCE DEFEN…NATURAL RESOURCE DEFENSE COUNCIL - LOS ANGELES — $50,000 · OtherNATURAL RESOURCE DEFEN…AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS - SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL — $5,000 · OtherGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 · OtherNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $45,000 · EducationNATIONAL …One Spark Foundation Inc — $20,000 · EducationOne Spark…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $45,000 · InternationalTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER — $10,000 · Health
Animals$305,000Environment$170,000Other$150,000Education$65,000International$45,000Health$10,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetREWILD — $200,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC — $100,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $85,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC SOCIETY — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $45,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOne Spark Foundation Inc — $20,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCoalition for Clean Air — $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE CENTER — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetHEAL THE BAY — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetWATERKEEPER ALLIANCE INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPeaceful Valley Donkey Rescue Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGALAPAGOS CONSERVANCY INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization A Blue Sky Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph