Skip to content
A & L Borg Private Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

A & L Borg Private Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$95k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Health$1.3MEducation$440kReligion$386kInternational$100kHuman Services$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $75k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Shaare Zedek Medical Center$75,000
Bikur Cholim of Manhattan$10,000
CHABAD OF THE WESTSIDE$6,000
Lubavitch Educational Center$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

US giving: 44% of grant dollars ($1.0M). The need read here covers only this US portion; the 56% that went abroad ($1.3M) is mapped below.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY20–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 83% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHARIR ZADAK MEDICAL CTR: $330k → 16%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGAN DAVID ADOM: $100k → 17%THE R0HR JEWISH LEARNING INSTITUTE: $5k → 20%YOUNG ISREAL OF BALHARBOR: $15k → 15%FUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOL: $34k → 17%ROSENBAUM YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $55k → 7%SHARIR ZADAK MEDICAL CTR: $330k → 16%UNITED HATZOLAH: $13k → 17%CALIFORNIA CLUB CHABAD: $3k → 15%FUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOL: $30k → 17%ROSENBAUM YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $49k → 7%FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZOLH: $105k → 17%Lubavitch Educational Center: $4k → 15%FUCHS MIZACHI SCHOOL: $14k → 17%ROSENBAUM YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $45k → 7%FRIENDS OF UNITED HATZOLH: $5k → 17%LUBAUITCH EDUCATIONAL CANTAK OF FLORIDA: $4k → 15%FUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOL: $11k → 17%RYSJ YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $40k → 7%JNF SECIAL IN UNIFORM: $10k → 17%LUBAUITCH EDUCATIONAL CANTAK OF FLORIDA: $3k → 15%YESHIVAT NOAM: $20k → 7%CONGREGATION AHAUATH CHASAD: $50k → 17%LUBAVITCH EDUCATIONAL CTR: $3k → 15%YESHIVAT NOAM: $18k → 7%BIRUR CHCLIM OF MANHATTAN: $20k → 17%YESHIVA NOAM: $13k → 7%Bikur Cholim of Manhattan: $10k → 17%YAVNEH ACADEMY: $12k → 7%BIJVA CHOLOM OF MANHATTAN: $10k → 17%MAUANOT YESHIVA HIGHSCHOOL FOR GIRLS: $25k → 7%CHABAD OF THE WESTSIDE: $6k → 17%HEICHAL HATORAH: $17k → 7%CHABAD OF THE WESTSIDE: $6k → 17%CHABAD OF THE WESTSIDE: $6k → 17%CHABAD OF THE WEST SIDE: $5k → 17%CHABAD OF THE WEST SIDE: $5k → 17%CHABAD OF THE WEST SIDE: $4k → 17%JEWISH WOMENS CLUB: $10k → 17%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $100k → 17%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $28k → 17%YESHIVA UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOL: $27k → 17%YESHIVA UNIV HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 17%BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN CO FRIEDMAN: $25k → 17%BIKUH CHOLIN OF MANHATTAN: $10k → 17%WEST SIDE HATYZOLH: $7k → 17%CONG AHAVATH CHRSED: $4k → 17%CONG AHAUATA CHESED: $3k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Beyond the US: 56% of all-years giving ($1.3M)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
Israel$1.3M · 15 grants
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving. International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same 990 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

57%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 11 repeat orgs$1.0M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +12% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
33

Total granted

$1.3M
$917k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+12%
0%

Still filing today

45%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 11% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $85k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationReligionHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • YU
    YESHIVA UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2020–2023 · $128k · revenue +41%
  • FM
    FUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLS
    3× · 2020–2023 · $75k · revenue +58%
  • WS
    West Side Hatzoloh
    3× · 2022–2024 · $7k · revenue +12%

Funded once

  • SZ
    SHAREI ZADEK MEDICAL CTR
    one grant, 2022 · $340k
  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
  • SZ
    SHARI ZEDEK HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Ohr Yisroel
Philanthropy
2
Tomchei Torah Inc

Religious Teaching

—
3
Yeshiva Keren Hatorah of Passaic- Clifton

To operate a high school offering religious instruction and general studies as well as a post high school program of talmudic studies. the school shall be run under the standards of orthodox jewish law and tradition.

Education
4
Yeshiva Derech Hatorah-Yeshivat Mizrachi Lbanim

A school-section 170(b)(1)(a)(ii), operating from the preschool pre-k level through high school, and chartered ny the new york state education department and board of regents.

Education
5
Passaic Hebrew Institute

YBH of Passaic, a K-8 yeshiva in Passaic, New Jersey, emphasizes the primacy of Torah and Yiras Shomayim and offers a serious and comprehensive General Studies curriculum. YBH stresses the importance of middos tovos and acting with…

Education
6
The Nochim & Rivka Zeldes Foundation
—
7
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
8
Yeshiva Chayei Olam

Yeshiva chayei olam inc., was established for the purpose of having an orthodox jewish high school. the school teaches talumdic studies, talmudic jurasprudence, orthodox jewish ethics and the old testament. in addition, the school provides…

Education
9
Yeshivat Mekor Chaim Inc

High school, offering academic classes in english, history, math, and science, as well as a full array of courses in judaic studies and co-curricular activities such as physical education and classes in the arts.

Education
10
Kollel Nefesh Hachaim Inc
Education
11
Chevras Shabbos Kodesh Podcast Fellowship
Religion
12
Torah Temimah Jerusalem

The school trains advanced talmudic scholars, enabling them to become high level teachers and religious leaders in israel and the united states using specific methodology combining traditional talmudic study with innovative learning…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Yeshiva University High Schools; the most unlike its peers is Yeshiva University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
6/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHARIR ZADAK MEDICAL CTR: $660,000 · OtherSHARIR ZADAK MEDICAL CTRSHAREI ZADEK MEDICAL CTR: $340,000 · OtherSHAREI ZADEK MEDICAL CTRYESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $189,000 · OtherYESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEYFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZOLH: $110,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF UNITED HATZOLHSHARI ZEDEK HOSPITAL: $100,000 · OtherFUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLS: $75,000 · OtherShaare Zedek Medical Center: $75,000 · Other+30 more: $419,800 · Other+30 moreYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $128,000 · EducationYESHIVA UN…YESHIVA UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLS: $52,000 · EducationYESHIVA UN…HEICHAL HATORAH: $17,000 · EducationHEICHAL HA…YESHIVAT NOAM: $12,550 · EducationYESHIVAT N…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100,000 · InternationalBIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC: $10,000 · HealthWest Side Hatzoloh: $6,500 · HealthJEWISH WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $10,000 · ReligionNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $1,000 · Religion
Other$1,968,800Education$209,550International$100,000Health$16,500Religion$11,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetYESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY: $189,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY: $128,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLS: $75,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLS: $52,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHEICHAL HATORAH: $17,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVAT NOAM: $12,550 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH WOMEN'S CLUB INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetWest Side Hatzoloh: $6,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNATIONAL JEWISH OUTREACH PROGRAM IN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds YESHIVA OF NORTH JERSEY ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds FUCHS MIZRACHI SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVA UNIVERSITY HIGH SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds HEICHAL HATORAH ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT NOAM ↗
  • Who funds BIKUR CHOLIM OF MANHATTAN INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH WOMEN'S CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds West Side Hatzoloh ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundThe Ojc FundJoseph and Martha Mel…The Lyons Family Foun…Aviva & Marvin Sussma…Jeannette and H Peter…Cd FoundationThe Chestnut Foundati…Gertrude and Morris B…Center for Initiative…Jewish Community Foun…Fjc
Jewish Communal FundNY21.9× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Ojc Fund · Joseph and Martha Melohn Tzedaka Fund · The Lyons Family Foundation · Aviva & Marvin Sussman Foundation · Jeannette and H Peter Kriendler Char Trust · Cd Foundation · The Chestnut Foundation · Gertrude and Morris Bienenfeld Charitable Foundation · Center for Initiatives in Jewish Education · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Metrowest NJ · Fjc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization A & L Borg Private Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from A & L Borg Private Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Heichal Hatorah: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on A & L Borg Private’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home