Skip to content

· Public charity

71mvp Inc

At 71 mvp, inc.

$129k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Health$115kFood & Nutrition$110kYouth Development$100kHuman Services$94kPhilanthropy$55k
02FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $118,750, the rows itemized in this filing. The $128,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $9,750 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$17,500
Median grant
1
States reached
$603k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HALIFAX MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC$50,000
SMA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION$35,000
JEEP BEACH INC$17,500
FUN COAST FOUNDATION$11,250
NASCAR FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $129k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%VOLUSIA SCHOOL FUEL INC: $100k → 12%JEEP BEACH INC: $18k → 12%FUN COAST FOUNDATION: $11k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
J&a Racing Foundation Inc
Public Benefit
2
850 Crew Car Club Inc
Health
3
Savannah Harbor Foundation Inc

The organizations was founded in 2001 to support local childrens charities and to present family-oriented community events. the foundation was began as a response to the 9/11 tragedy with the goal of bringing feel-good, family-friendly,…

—
4
Family House Foundation Inc

Family house foundation supports family house, which serves as a home away from home for families of children with cancer and other life-threatening illnesses by providing physical comfort and emotional support, free from financial…

—
5
Jessica June Children's Cancer Foundation Inc

The mission of jessica june children's cancer foundation (the "organization") is to help children and their families fight cancer by providing emergency financial assistance for basic human necessities and supportive care services.…

Health
6
Childrens Health Foundation
—
7
Celebrities Fore Kids Inc

The organization's mission is to make a difference in the lives of children affected by cancer and other life-threatening illnesses. we strive to improve the quality of life and well-being for them and their families by offering financial…

Human Services
8
The Florida Medical Clinic Foundation of Caring Inc

Florida medical clinic foundation of caring strives to support individuals, children, and families in need throughout hillsborough and pasco counties. continued on schedule o.florida medical clinic foundation of caring strives to support…

Health
9
Florida Cancer Specialists Foundation Inc

The foundation's mission is to develop and foster community resources and provide education as well as non-medical financial assistance to patients undergoing cancer treatment in the state of florida.

Philanthropy
10
Jupiter Hills Community Foundation Inc

To provide financial support to sick and needy individuals and families who serve the jupiter hills community. the foundation will also support local charities when a need arises.

Philanthropy
11
Warrior Kids Foundation
Health
12
Stop Children's Cancer of Palm Beach County

To conduct fundraising activities to support cancer research and awareness concentrating on providing grants to research hospitals and institutions focused on pediatric oncology.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Halifax Healthy Families Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Volusia School Fuel Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
3/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VOLUSIA SCHOOL FUEL INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesVOLUSIA SCHOOL FUEL INCJEEP BEACH INC: $17,500 · Human ServicesJEEP BEACH INCFUN COAST FOUNDATION INC: $11,250 · Human ServicesFUN COAST FOUNDATION INCCHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · HealthCHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION…HALIFAX HEALTHY FAMILIES CORPORATION: $15,000 · HealthHALIFAX HEALTHY FAMILIES CO…BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF VOLUSIA FLAGLER: $100,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF V…HALIFAX MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 · OtherHALIFAX MEDICAL…SMA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · PhilanthropySMA HEALTHCAR…MOTORSPORTS CHARITIES INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyMOTORSPORTS C…FBH COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$128,750Health$115,000Youth Development$100,000Other$65,000Philanthropy$55,000Food & Nutrition$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF VOLUSIA FLAGLER: $100,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetHALIFAX MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $65,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetSMA HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetJEEP BEACH INC: $17,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetHALIFAX HEALTHY FAMILIES CORPORATION: $15,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetFBH COMMUNITY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetMOTORSPORTS CHARITIES INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jeep Beach IncFL20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jeep Beach Inc · Motorsports Charities Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 71mvp Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 71mvp Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Jeep Beach Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 71mvp Inc?

Find your warmest path to 71mvp Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 71mvp’s filings →

More from the funding graph