Skip to content

· Public charity

55 Green Meadows

To promote social welfare and provide education to the public regarding senior care options in the state of ohio.

$606k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$4.3MPublic Benefit$370kCommunity Improvement$50kCivil Rights$35k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
$25,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$45k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNITED CONSERVATIVES POLICY FUND$750,000
OHIO WORKS$250,000
NK BAUR & ASSOCIATES$40,000
ALLIANCE FOR FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY$25,000
AMERICAN LIBERTY ACTION FUND$15,000
RSCC BUILDING FUND$12,751
OHIO HOUSE REPUBLICAN ALLIANCE BUILDING FUND$12,751
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LIBERTY OHIO: $225k → 14%AMERICAN LIBERTY ACTION FUND: $15k → 5%GENERATION NOW: $230k → 11%REVITALIZATION PROJECT: $100k → 14%OHIOANS FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS: $150k → 15%CENTURION PAC INC: $10k → 16%BUCKEYE LEADERSHIP FUND: $75k → 17%GOPAC EDUCATION FUND: $10k → 7%UNITED CONSERVATIVES POLICY FUND: $750k → 9%ONWARD POLICY INSTITUTE: $25k → 15%LIBERTY OHIO: $185k → 14%GENERATION NOW: $150k → 11%THE FUTURE OF OHIO: $100k → 15%PROTECT OUR CONSTITUTION LLC: $100k → 16%UNITED CONSERVATIVES POLICY FUND: $500k → 9%INVEST IN OHIO: $150k → 14%GENERATION NOW: $30k → 11%RENEW OHIO: $75k → 15%PROTECT OHIO WORKERS AND FAMILIES: $25k → 16%AMERICAN POLICY COALITION: $25k → 14%OHIOANS FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS: $60k → 15%AMERICAN FREEDOM BUILDERS: $35k → 14%OHIOANS FOR A HEALTHY ECONOMY: $50k → 15%AFFORDABLE ENERGY FUND LLC: $100k → 14%OHIO JOBS & PROSPERITY FUND: $25k → 15%REPUBLICAN GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION: $100k → 14%OHIO HOUSE REPUBLICAN ALLIANCE BUILDING FUND: $13k → 15%OHIO WORKS: $250k → 15%OHIO FIRST FUND: $50k → 15%ORP BUILDING FUND: $30k → 15%RSCC BUILDING FUND: $13k → 15%HOUSE BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%HOUSE BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%HOUSE BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%UNITING OHIO: $100k → 15%UNITING OHIO: $75k → 15%SECURING OHIO'S FUTURE: $160k → 15%OHIO WORKS: $195k → 15%SECURING OHIO'S FUTURE: $125k → 15%FAIR OHIO: $40k → 15%SENATE BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%HOUSE REPUBLICAN BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%SENATE BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%SENATE BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%OHIO GOVERNORS RESIDENCE & OFFICE FOUNDATION: $50k → 15%SENATE BUILDING FUND: $10k → 15%ALLIANCE FOR FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY: $25k → 15%NK BAUR & ASSOCIATES: $40k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.0M · 10 repeat orgs$1.7M to everyone else

10 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
21

Total granted

$3.0M
$1.4M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+108%

Still filing today

30%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $343k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
Public BenefitCommunity ImprovementCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Conservative Policy Fund
    2× · 2023–2024 · $1.3M · 69% of their budget
  • GN
    GENERATION NOW
    4× · 2017–2020 · $410k · revenue -93% · 57% of their budget
  • LO
    LIBERTY OHIO INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $410k · 36% of their budget

Funded once

  • OW
    OHIO WORKS INC
    2× · 2017–2018 · $195k
  • II
    INVEST IN OHIO
    2× · 2018–2022 · $150k · revenue -96% · 94% of their budget
  • RG
    Republican Governors Association
    one grant, 2022 · $100k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ohio Conservative Restoration Project

Ohio conservative restoration seeks to educate the public about common sense solutions to various public policy issues in the state of ohio, including but not limited to law enforcement and the promotion of law and order.

—
2
Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights

Ballot issue political action committee in the State of Ohio to advocate for the passage of a constitutional amendment to protect reproductive rights.

—
3
Ohioans for Redistricting Reform

Research organization focuses on eliminating and preventing gerrymandering in the State of Ohio.

—
4
Ohio Growth Partnership

To promote the common good and general welfare of ohioans.

—
5
Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom Pac

Ballot issue political action committee advocating for the passage of a constitutional amendment in the State of Ohio to protect reproductive freedom.

—
6
Ohioans for Secure and Fair Elections

Statewide ballot issue committee.

—
7
Open Road Path Inc

Educate and advance the economic develoment potential of ohio through public relations, social media, advertising, grassroots organization, and policy advancement initiatives.

—
8
Conservative Agenda for America

Conservative Agenda for America stands for the sanctity of life and the protection of women by educating citizens about the dangers of abortion.

—
9
Ohio Debate Commission Inc

Our mission is to foster fair and substantive debates that encourage participation in our democracy, and our vision is of a stronger Ohio, with well informed voters and highly qualified public servants, candidates, and elected officials.

Civil Rights
10
Citizens Not Politicians

Citizens Not Politicians is an Ohio ballot initiative campaign advocating for a constitutional amendment that would create a new process for drawing voting districts.

—
11
Senate Opportunity Fund

Advance Conservative Solutions Through Research And Communication On Public Policy Issues.

—
12
Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom

Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom, Inc. is a coalition of statewide reproductive heal, rights, and justice organizations working to secure abortion access and protect reproductive freedom in Ohio.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Securing Ohio's Future Inc; the most unlike its peers is Generation Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

8
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/24
Grantees still filing
11/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

United Conservative Policy Fund: $1,250,000 · OtherUnited Conservative Policy FundGENERATION NOW: $410,000 · OtherGENERATION NOWLIBERTY OHIO INC: $410,000 · OtherLIBERTY OHIO INCSECURING OHIO'S FUTURE INC: $345,000 · OtherSECURING OHIO'S FUTURE INCOhio Works: $250,000 · OtherOhio WorksOHIOANS FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS: $210,000 · OtherOHIO WORKS INC: $195,000 · OtherUNITING OHIO INC: $175,000 · OtherINVEST IN OHIO: $150,000 · Other+21 more: $995,502 · Other+21 moreThe Revitalization Project: $100,000 · Community ImprovementOhio Governor's Residence and Office Foundation: $50,000 · Community ImprovementRENEW OHIO: $75,000 · Public BenefitOHIOANS FOR A HEALTHY ECONOMY INC: $50,000 · Public BenefitAmerican Policy Coalition: $25,000 · Public BenefitAMERICAN FREEDOM BUILDERS INC: $35,000 · Civil Rights
Other$4,390,502Community Improvement$150,000Public Benefit$150,000Civil Rights$35,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUnited Conservative Policy Fund: $1,250,000 over 2y, 69% of budgetGENERATION NOW: $410,000 over 4y, 57% of budgetLIBERTY OHIO INC: $410,000 over 2y, 36% of budgetSECURING OHIO'S FUTURE INC: $345,000 over 4y, 27% of budgetOhio Works: $250,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetOHIOANS FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS: $210,000 over 2y, 60% of budgetUNITING OHIO INC: $175,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetINVEST IN OHIO: $150,000 over 2y, 94% of budgetThe Revitalization Project: $100,000 over 1y, 69% of budgetRENEW OHIO: $75,000 over 1y, 63% of budgetOHIOANS FOR A HEALTHY ECONOMY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetOHIO FIRST FUND INC: $50,000 over 1y, 21% of budgetAMERICAN FREEDOM BUILDERS INC: $35,000 over 2y, 22% of budgetAMERICAN LIBERTY ACTION FUND: $15,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetGOPAC EDUCATION FUND INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Conservative Policy Fund ↗
  • Who funds GENERATION NOW ↗
  • Who funds LIBERTY OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds SECURING OHIO'S FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Works ↗
  • Who funds OHIOANS FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS ↗
  • Who funds UNITING OHIO INC ↗
  • Who funds INVEST IN OHIO ↗
  • Who funds The Revitalization Project ↗
  • Who funds RENEW OHIO ↗
  • Who funds OHIOANS FOR A HEALTHY ECONOMY INC ↗
  • Who funds OHIO FIRST FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds Ohio Governor's Residence and Office Foundation ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FREEDOM BUILDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds American Policy Coalition ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN LIBERTY ACTION FUND ↗
  • Who funds GOPAC EDUCATION FUND INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of AmericaDC25.8× affinity11 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Empowering Ohio's Economy Inc · Wholesale Beer and Wine Assoc of Ohio · American Advancement

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 55 Green Meadows funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 55 Green Meadows. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 55 Green Meadows?

    Find your warmest path to 55 Green Meadows through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 55 Green Meadows’ filings →

    More from the funding graph