· Public charity
55 Green Meadows
To promote social welfare and provide education to the public regarding senior care options in the state of ohio.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k5 grants · $106k
- $250k+2 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED CONSERVATIVES POLICY FUND | $750,000 |
| OHIO WORKS | $250,000 |
| NK BAUR & ASSOCIATES | $40,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR FREEDOM AND RESPONSIBILITY | $25,000 |
| AMERICAN LIBERTY ACTION FUND | $15,000 |
| OHIO HOUSE REPUBLICAN ALLIANCE BUILDING FUND | $12,751 |
| RSCC BUILDING FUND | $12,751 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
10 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 8 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $343k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UCUnited Conservative Policy Fund2× · 2023–2024 · $1.3M · 69% of their budget
- LOLIBERTY OHIO INC2× · 2019–2020 · $410k · 36% of their budget
- GNGENERATION NOW4× · 2017–2020 · $410k · revenue -93% · 57% of their budget
Funded once
- OWOHIO WORKS INC2× · 2017–2018 · $195k
- IIINVEST IN OHIO2× · 2018–2022 · $150k · revenue -96% · 94% of their budget
- AEAffordable Energy Fund PACone grant, 2022 · $100k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Ohio conservative restoration seeks to educate the public about common sense solutions to various public policy issues in the state of ohio, including but not limited to law enforcement and the promotion of law and order.
Ballot issue political action committee in the State of Ohio to advocate for the passage of a constitutional amendment to protect reproductive rights.
Research organization focuses on eliminating and preventing gerrymandering in the State of Ohio.
To promote the common good and general welfare of ohioans.
Ballot issue political action committee advocating for the passage of a constitutional amendment in the State of Ohio to protect reproductive freedom.
Statewide ballot issue committee.
Educate and advance the economic develoment potential of ohio through public relations, social media, advertising, grassroots organization, and policy advancement initiatives.
Conservative Agenda for America stands for the sanctity of life and the protection of women by educating citizens about the dangers of abortion.
Our mission is to foster fair and substantive debates that encourage participation in our democracy, and our vision is of a stronger Ohio, with well informed voters and highly qualified public servants, candidates, and elected officials.
Citizens Not Politicians is an Ohio ballot initiative campaign advocating for a constitutional amendment that would create a new process for drawing voting districts.
Advance Conservative Solutions Through Research And Communication On Public Policy Issues.
Ohioans for Reproductive Freedom, Inc. is a coalition of statewide reproductive heal, rights, and justice organizations working to secure abortion access and protect reproductive freedom in Ohio.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Securing Ohio's Future Inc and the most unlike its peers is Generation Now. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Conservative Policy Fund ↗
- Who funds LIBERTY OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds GENERATION NOW ↗
- Who funds SECURING OHIO'S FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds Ohio Works ↗
- Who funds OHIOANS FOR FREE AND FAIR ELECTIONS ↗
- Who funds UNITING OHIO INC ↗
- Who funds INVEST IN OHIO ↗
- Who funds The Revitalization Project ↗
- Who funds RENEW OHIO ↗
- Who funds Ohio Governor's Residence and Office Foundation ↗
- Who funds OHIO FIRST FUND INC ↗
- Who funds OHIOANS FOR A HEALTHY ECONOMY INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FREEDOM BUILDERS INC ↗
- Who funds American Policy Coalition ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN LIBERTY ACTION FUND ↗
- Who funds GOPAC EDUCATION FUND INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America · Empowering Ohio's Economy Inc · Wholesale Beer and Wine Assoc of Ohio · American Advancement
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 55 Green Meadows funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to 55 Green Meadows?
Find your warmest path to 55 Green Meadows through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.