Skip to content

· Public charity

43north Bpc Inc

To conduct a global business plan competition promoting the buffalo/niagara region and western new york as an emerging entrepreneurial center of activity for startup companies, to attract new businesses and new business ideas to western new york, and to provide financial and entrepreneurial support to contest winners and other startups…

$5.6M
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Community Improvement$36MScience & Tech$2.1MHealth$1.4MRecreation & Sports$1.1MHousing & Shelter$1.0MEnvironment$825kFood & Nutrition$140kArts & Culture$115kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $50k–250k4 grants · $467k
  • $250k+6 grants · $5.1M
$900,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$11M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ZAM HELMETS INC$1,000,000
G CARDS INC$900,000
LEAPING HARTS INC (DBA KREDIT ACADEMY)$900,000
GUIDESLY INC$900,000
STEPWISE ELECTRIC INC$900,000
EMPIRICAN GROUP INC$500,000
OUIBY INC$166,666
OTRAFY INC$100,000
MOD TECH LABS INC$100,000
TASKUNITE INC$100,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%GRADBERRY INC DBA TARAAI: $500k → 8%HIGHERME: $600k → 14%ASARASI: $500k → 9%ROBODUB INC: $500k → 9%ONCOLINX: $750k → 14%PATHOVAX: $500k → 19%HIGHERME: $400k → 14%FORMARUM: $500k → 13%SPARKCHARGE INC: $1.0M → 13%CLEANFIBER INC: $300k → 13%IMMERSED GAMES INC: $500k → 13%CLEAN SLATE: $300k → 13%KANGAROOTIME INC: $300k → 13%43NORTH FOUNDATION INC: $3.5M → 13%ZAM HELMETS INC: $1.0M → 13%AIRZAAR INC: $1.0M → 13%SOMADETECT INC: $1.0M → 13%LEAPING HARTS INC (DBA KREDIT ACADEMY): $900k → 13%STEPWISE ELECTRIC INC: $900k → 13%MOD TECH LABS INC: $900k → 13%GUIDESLY INC: $900k → 13%G CARDS INC: $900k → 13%OTRAFY INC: $900k → 13%TASKUNITE INC: $900k → 13%CHANGE AI INC (DBA HIOPERATOR): $750k → 13%KANGAROOTIME INC: $725k → 13%TWIPES USA LIMITED: $685k → 13%SQUIRE TECHNOLOGIES INC: $650k → 13%FEMI SECRETS: $575k → 13%BURNER FITNESS INC: $500k → 13%MAGNUSMODE US INC: $500k → 13%GROUPRAISE INC: $500k → 13%WHOSEYOURLANDLORD: $500k → 13%ULTRACELL INSULATION: $500k → 13%EMPIRICAN GROUP INC: $500k → 13%CHANGE AI INC (DBA HIOPERATOR): $500k → 13%SUNCAYR INC: $500k → 13%LEGWORKS INC: $500k → 13%EMPIRICAN GROUP INC: $500k → 13%BOUNCE IMAGING: $500k → 13%WEDITIT: $500k → 13%PEANUT BUTTER INC: $500k → 13%OUIBY INC (DBA KICKFURTHER): $500k → 13%FORSAKE INC: $500k → 13%RALLY BUS CORP: $500k → 13%SHEARSHARE INC: $400k → 13%PHOOD INC: $333k → 13%AIRZAAR INC: $300k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

29%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$12M · 18 repeat orgs$30M to everyone else

18 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 13 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
763

Total granted

$12M
$26M

Still filing today

0%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 17% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AI
    AIRZAAR INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $1.3M
  • CA
    CHANGE AI INC (DBA HIOPERATOR)
    2× · 2019–2020 · $1.3M
  • KI
    KANGAROOTIME INC
    2× · 2018–2021 · $1.0M

Funded once

  • 4F
    43NORTH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2021 · $3.5M · revenue -94%
  • SI
    SPARKCHARGE INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M
  • SI
    SOMADETECT INC
    one grant, 2018 · $1.0M
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field
04the grantee network

1 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2024, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1 of the 786 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
1/1
Grantees still filing
0/1
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

43NORTH FOUNDATION INC: $3,498,887 · Other43NORTH FOUNDATION INCAIRZAAR INC: $1,300,000 · OtherCHANGE AI INC (DBA HIOPERATOR): $1,250,000 · Other+197 more: $30,909,999 · Other+197 more
Other$36,958,886

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%grantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget43NORTH FOUNDATION INC: $3,498,887 over 1y, 6.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 43NORTH FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Council for Community Development IncNY12× affinity30 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Council for Community Development Inc · Local Initiatives Support Corporation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 43north Bpc Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 43north Bpc Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’21’22’23’24
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY21–24
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 786 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 43north Bpc’s filings →

    More from the funding graph