Skip to content
3de National LLC at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

3de National LLC

3de re-engineers high school education to be more relevant, experiential, and authentically connected to the complexities of the real world in order to more fully prepare today's students for the demands of tomorrow's economy.

$825k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$440k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

International$1.3MEducation$110kYouth Development$85k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $115k
  • $250k+2 grants · $710k
$40,000
Median grant
6
States reached
$4.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GEORGIA INC$440,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF TAMPA BAY INC$270,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC$40,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE AMERICA INC$25,000
JA OF GREATER WASHINGTON$25,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY21–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Junior Achievement of Northern California Inc: $75k → 9%Junior Achievement of Southern CA: $6k → 14%Junior Achievement of Dallas: $40k → 14%Junior Achievement of Greater Washington Inc: $60k → 14%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF TAMPA BAY INC: $270k → 13%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE AMERICA INC: $25k → 16%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $25k → 17%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GEORGIA INC: $440k → 13%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC: $40k → 9%Junior Achievement of Dallas Inc: $29k → 14%JA OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $25k → 14%Junior Achievement of Tampa Bay Inc: $20k → 13%Junior Achievement of Georgia Inc: $270k → 13%ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $110k → 13%JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GEORGIA INC: $50k → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
WI
CA
KS
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 4 repeat orgs$281k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 1 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
3

Total granted

$1.2M
$191k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+96%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’24’25
RenewedFirst-time
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JA
    Junior Achievement of Georgia
    3× · 2021–2025 · $760k · revenue +86%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF TAMPA BAY INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $290k · revenue +46%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON
    2× · 2024–2025 · $85k · revenue -15%

Funded once

  • AP
    ATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
    one grant, 2021 · $110k
  • JA
    Junior Achievement of Northern California
    one grant, 2024 · $75k · revenue -6%
  • JA
    JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +96%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Junior Achievement of North Central Michigan Inc

We are empowering young people to own their economic success. Our volunteer-based K-12 programs foster work-readiness, entrepreneurship, and financial literacy skills, and use experiential learning to inspire kids to dream big and reach…

Youth Development
2
Junior Achievement of Greater Hampton Roads Inc

Ja programs taught in k-12 classrooms and afterschool programs teach students about economics, financial literacy, entrepreneurship, and work readiness. (continued on schedule o)

International
3
Junior Achievement of Western Pennsylvania Inc

Junior achievement's mission is to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy. junior achievement teaches students in grades k-12 how to manage money, how to prepare for a career or college, and how to run a business.…

International
4
Junior Achievement of the Heartland Inc

Junior achievement (ja) is a worldwide organization that inspires and prepares young people to succeed in a global economy. they do this by providing work-readiness, financial literacy and entrepreneurship programs to students in…

International
5
Junior Achievement of Northeastern New York

Junior achievement is dedicated to giving young people the knowledge and skills they need to own their economic success, plan for their futures, and make smart academic and economic choices. ja empowers and inspires students through…

International
6
Junior Achievement of Alabama Inc

The mission of junior achievement is to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy. through a network of dedicated classroom mentors from the business community, junior achievement works with students and teachers in…

International
7
Junior Achievement of Greater St Louis Inc

Empowering young people to own their economic success through work readiness, entrepreneurship, and financial literacy.

International
8
Junior Achievement North

To inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.

International
9
Junior Achievement of Central Maryland Inc

Junior achievement is the proven provider of work and career readiness experiences for central maryland youth. by bridging the gap between education and business, ja will drive community transformation by providing volunteer supported…

International
10
Junior Achievement of Greater South Carolina Inc

Junior achievement of greater south carolina (jagsc) is dedicated to inspiring and preparing young people to thrive in a global economy. through innovative learning experiences, ja focuses on three core areas: financial literacy,…

International
11
Junior Achievement of Southeast Texas Inc

Junior Achievement's mission is to inspire and prepare young people to succeed in a global economy.

International
12
Junior Achievement of South Texas Inc

Junior achievement of south texas's mission is to inspire and prepare young peopleto succeed in a global economy. the purpose is to educate and inspire young peopleto value free enterprise, business, and economics to improve the quality of…

International
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Junior Achievement of Tampa Bay Inc; the most unlike its peers is Junior Achievement of Dallas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
3/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Junior Achievement of Georgia: $760,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of GeorgiaJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF TAMPA BAY INC: $290,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF TAMPA BAY INCJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $85,000 · InternationalJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTONJunior Achievement of Northern California: $75,000 · InternationalJunior Achievement of Northern CaliforniaJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC: $68,500 · International+4 more: $96,250 · International+4 moreATLANTA PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $110,000 · Other
International$1,374,750Other$110,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJunior Achievement of Georgia: $760,000 over 3y, 2.6% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF TAMPA BAY INC: $290,000 over 2y, 3.4% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $85,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetJunior Achievement of Northern California: $75,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF DALLAS INC: $68,500 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS INC: $40,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF WISCONSIN INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF MIDDLE AMERICA INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC: $6,250 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Donor Advised Charita…
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO7.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 3de National LLC funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 3de National LLC. Bigger dots raise more.

2025
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 3de National LLC’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home