Skip to content

· Public charity

2222 Foundation

To raise awareness and provide resources for abandoned and orphaned children.

$283k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$115k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Human Services$851kReligion$355kEducation$60kInternational$57kCommunity Improvement$25kPhilanthropy$12kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 7 grants below total $218,200, the rows itemized in this filing. The $283,402 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $65,202 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $96k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $115k
$12,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$428k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME$115,000
SAFE$32,000
KINGDOM MATTERS ORGANIZATION INC$31,700
ANABAPTIST PERSPECTIVES$12,000
SHENANDOAH CHRISTIAN MUSIC CAMP$10,000
GOSPEL EXPRESS TEXAS$10,000
OSCEOLA CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$7,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $859k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%I58 GREECE: $8k → 9%SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $242k → 10%CHAZAK RESCUE: $10k → 9%SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $182k → 10%SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $115k → 10%SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $93k → 10%SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $84k → 10%SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $76k → 10%SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $50k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WI
PA
CO
VA
NM
TN
MS
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 7 repeat orgs$187k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +92% since the first grant, against -44% for those funded once.

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
10

Total granted

$1.2M
$159k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+92%
-44%

Still filing today

57%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SL
    SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME
    7× · 2018–2024 · $841k · revenue +38% · 47% of their budget
  • KM
    KINGDOM MATTERS ORGANIZATION INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $78k · revenue +92%
  • S
    SAFE
    2× · 2023–2024 · $49k · revenue +113%

Funded once

  • CM
    CENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue -72%
  • MH
    MERLE HERR SERVING LEADER PROJECT
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ivory Coast Christian Mission

train church leaders and planting churches outside USA

Religion
2
Orphanos Foundation

Christian-based aid to orphans

Human Services
3
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
4
Sozo International Inc

Sozo International partners with at-risk families to create a sustainable future and transformed lives through education, health, and economic initiatives.

—
5
Cross to Light Corporation

Cross to Light is a nondenominational Christian organization providing spiritual education and physical aid to people in need around the world. Since 2005, Cross to Light has helped people cross from darkness to light by hearing the Gospel…

Religion
6
Crossing Cultures International Inc

Crossing Cultures International, Inc. exists to glorify God by equipping Christ followers globally with comprehensive training for effective ministry.

Religion
7
Harvest Bridge

Harvest Bridge equips South Asian Christians to serve their communities more effectively. With our assistance, people and communities in South Asia are transformed by the love of Christ.

Religion
8
Casa Shalom Ministries Inc

Christian Ministry Organization

Human Services
9
Child Hope International

We minister to orphans and widows in their distress by transitioning children from orphanages into loving families. We do this through Christ- centered care, training and social work.

Arts & Culture
10
International Faith Missions

Aid to destitute in haiti

International
11
Franciscan Works

To provide missionary support to poor children and orphans in Sub-Saharan Africa, Central America, the Carribean and elsewhere

International
12
Cci City Changers International

City Changers strives to reach the impoverished community with the love of Jesus Christ by offering community and religious services.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Central Miami Christian Academy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shining Light Children's Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $841,000 · Human ServicesSHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME+2 more: $18,026 · Human ServicesANABAPTIST SAVINGS AND LOANS: $150,000 · OtherANABAPTIST SAVINGS AND LOANSBRIDGEPOINT INTL MINISTRIES: $33,000 · OtherBRIDGEPOINT INTL MINISTRIESIndividual grant recipient: $31,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFAITH BUILDERS EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC: $30,000 · OtherFAITH BUILDERS EDUCATIONAL PR…MERLE HERR SERVING LEADER PROJECT: $25,000 · OtherMERLE HERR SERVING LEADER PRO…Individual grant recipient: $20,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+8 more: $73,500 · Other+8 moreKINGDOM MATTERS ORGANIZATION INC: $78,200 · ReligionCENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $50,000 · EducationSAFE: $49,000 · InternationalAnabaptist Foundation: $12,000 · Philanthropy
Human Services$859,026Other$362,900Religion$78,200Education$50,000International$49,000Philanthropy$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME: $841,000 over 7y, 47% of budgetKINGDOM MATTERS ORGANIZATION INC: $78,200 over 3y, 17% of budgetCENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetSAFE: $49,000 over 2y, 2.0% of budgetFAITH BUILDERS EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetAnabaptist Foundation: $12,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAZAK: $10,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgeti58 Global: $8,026 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHINING LIGHT CHILDREN'S HOME ↗
  • Who funds KINGDOM MATTERS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL MIAMI CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds SAFE ↗
  • Who funds FAITH BUILDERS EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Anabaptist Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CHAZAK ↗
  • Who funds i58 Global ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Anabaptist FoundationPA17.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Anabaptist Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 2222 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 2222 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 2222 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 2222 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 2222’s filings →

    More from the funding graph