Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

2021 All-Star Inc

Engaging in, advancing, promoting, supporting and administering activities and projects related to hosting the nba all-star weekend in indianapolis in 2024 and the wnba all-star weekend in indianapolis in 2025.

$25k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0163% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2020–2024.

Human Services$190kYouth Development$175kReligion$100kRecreation & Sports$91kPublic Safety & Disaster$50kArts & Culture$50kHealth$50kEducation$25kOther$435k
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$25,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHRISTAMORE HOUSE$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $190k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%WHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 12%WASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $50k → 13%CHILDREN'S CHARITY INDIANA - A KID AGAIN INC: $50k → 16%DUNELAND YMCA: $40k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Clubs of Indianapolis Inc

Bgci believes that every young person deserves to live a life filled with hope and opportunity. because we care about our young people, we provide a safe, educational, and positive atmosphere where they can prosper and reach their full…

—
2
Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc

Mission and significant activities to promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in indiana; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and…

—
3
Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Southwest Michigan

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us the most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Club of Jackson Co

Youth services

Youth Development
5
Boys & Girls Club of Dumplin Valley

Servie the youth of jefferson and cocke county through summer and after school programming to inspire and enable them to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys & Girls Clubs of La Porte County Inc

Provide a safe place for youth to develop leadership skills

Youth Development
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of Harrison County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Club of Greater Holland

Programs for local youth

Youth Development
9
Boys & Girls Club of Washington County

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
10
Boys and Girls Clubs of Columbus Inc

To enable young people to reach their full potential

Youth Development
11
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Illinois

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
12
Boys and Girls Clubs of Siouxland Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc and the most unlike its peers is Aspire Higher Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 21. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%0%<5yr13%8%5–10yr16%20%10–20yr14%24%20–35yr11%28%35–55yr25%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%0%<5yr13%8%5–10yr16%19%10–20yr14%26%20–35yr11%27%35–55yr25%21%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
11%
2,052/17,895

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 25 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
15/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CONCORD CENTER ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · OtherCONCORD CENTER ASSOCIATION INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC — $50,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INCKNIGHTSTOWN KIDS — $50,000 · OtherKNIGHTSTOWN KIDSJAY COUNTY BOYS CLUB INC — $50,000 · OtherJAY COUNTY BOYS CLUB INCCHRISTAMORE HOUSE INC — $50,000 · OtherCHRISTAMORE HOUSE INCAGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCES — $50,000 · OtherAGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCESCHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC — $50,000 · OtherCHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INCHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC — $43,642 · OtherHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INCFRIENDS OF HISTORIC VERNON — $41,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF HISTORIC VERNONTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC — $50,000 · OtherTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISAB…PHALEN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY - INDIANA — $25,000 · OtherWASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $50,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON COUNTY …WHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesWHITE'S RESIDENTIA…A KID AGAIN INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesA KID AGAIN INCDUNELAND YMCA INC — $40,272 · Human ServicesDUNELAND YMCA INCBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO — $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CL…BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC — $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CL…Mad Co Sheriffs Dept Chaplaincy — $50,000 · ReligionMad Co Sh…Dream Center Evansville — $50,000 · ReligionDream Cen…JAMESON INC — $50,000 · Recreation & SportsL&A Park Foundation Inc — $41,415 · Recreation & SportsINDY PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$509,642Human Services$190,272Youth Development$175,000Religion$100,000Recreation & Sports$91,415Public Safety & Disaster$50,000Arts & Culture$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCONCORD CENTER ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINDY PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetMad Co Sheriffs Dept Chaplaincy — $50,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetJAY COUNTY BOYS CLUB INC — $50,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION — $50,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC — $50,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO — $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetCHRISTAMORE HOUSE INC — $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetAGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCES — $50,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetDream Center Evansville — $50,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetCHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetA KID AGAIN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJAMESON INC — $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC — $43,642 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetL&A Park Foundation Inc — $41,415 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetDUNELAND YMCA INC — $40,272 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPHALEN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY - INDIANA — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIndiana Youth Institu…United Way of Central…Central Indiana Commu…Early Learning Indian…Second Helpings IncThe Indianapolis Foun…Centerpoint Energy Fo…Boys & Girls Clubs in…Indiana Sports Corpor…Teachers Treasures IncThe Mind Trust Inc
Lilly Endowment IncIN24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Early Learning Indiana Inc · Second Helpings Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc · Indiana Sports Corporation · Teachers Treasures Inc · The Mind Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization 2021 All-Star Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 25 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines