Skip to content
2021 All-Star Inc at a glanceMostly funded, not a grantmaker: see who funds it →

· Public charity

2021 All-Star Inc

Engaging in, advancing, promoting, supporting and administering activities and projects related to hosting the wnba all-star weekend in indianapolis in 2025.

$1.2M
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$270k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Recreation & Sports$532kYouth Development$275kHuman Services$125kEducation$94kArts & Culture$91kReligion$50k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $1,160,000, the rows itemized in this filing. The $1,217,500 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $57,500 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $50k–250k1 grant · $125k
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.0M
$250,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MARION COUNTY COMMISSION ON YOUTH$270,000
FLETCHER PLACE COMMUNITY CENTER$265,000
INDY PARK ALLIANCE$250,000
INDIANAPOLIS ARTS COUNCIL$250,000
SAGAMORE INSTITUTE$125,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $460k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MARION COUNTY COMMISSION ON YOUTH: $270k → 5%WHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES: $50k → 12%WASHINGTON COUNTY FAMILY YMCA: $50k → 13%DUNELAND YMCA: $40k → 9%CHILDREN'S CHARITY INDIANA - A KID AGAIN INC: $50k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc

Mission and significant activities to promote exclusively the social welfare of boys and girls in indiana; to provide guidance and to promote the health, social, educational, vocational, character, and cultural development of boys and…

—
2
The Boys and Girls Clubs of Metropolitan Baltimore

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens

Youth Development
3
Indiana Center for Prevention of Youth Abuse and Suicide

Child advocacy organization that focuses on the prevention of child sexual abuse and youth suicide.

Youth Development
4
Boys & Girls Club of Tipton County

The boys & girls club is an organization dedicated to serving the youth of the community. their mission statement is: to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive,…

Youth Development
5
Boys & Girls Clubs of Central Iowa

To inspire and enable all young people especially those who need us most to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
6
Boys and Girls Clubs of Siouxland Inc

To inspire and enable all young people to realize their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens.

Youth Development
7
Boys & Girls Clubs of the Red River Valley

At the boys & girls clubs of the red river valley, we offer innovative out-of-school time programs designed to help youth excel in school, develop strong leadership skills, and lead healthy, productive lives. our mission is to provide a…

Youth Development
8
Boys & Girls Club of Lewis County

Our mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development
9
Illinois Valley Ymca

To put christian principles into practice that build a healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
10
Young Men's Christian Association of Southeast Texas

To put christian principles into practice through programs that build healthy spirit, mind, and body for all.

Human Services
11
Champaign Family Young Men's Christian a

The champaign family ymca's mission is to put christian principles into practice through programs that enhance personal growth and improve health of spirit, and mind and body for all. the champaign family ymca serves more than 5,000 people…

Human Services
12
Boys' & Girls' Club of Boone County Inc

Club helps area youth develop the skills, fitness, and character they need to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of the Northern Indiana Corridor Inc; the most unlike its peers is Aspire Higher Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
16/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FLETCHER PLACE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $265,000 · OtherFLETCHER PLACE COMMUNITY CENTER INCINDIANA PARKS ALLIANCE INC: $250,000 · OtherINDIANA PARKS ALLIANCE INCCONCORD CENTER ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC: $50,000 · OtherKNIGHTSTOWN KIDS: $50,000 · OtherCHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC: $50,000 · OtherJAY COUNTY BOYS CLUB INC: $50,000 · OtherCHRISTAMORE HOUSE INC: $50,000 · OtherAGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCES: $50,000 · OtherHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC: $43,642 · OtherFRIENDS OF HISTORIC VERNON: $41,000 · OtherINDY PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $50,000 · Other+1 more: $25,000 · OtherMARION COUNTY COMMISSION ON YOUTH INC: $270,000 · Human ServicesMARION COUNTY COMMISSI…WHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & …WASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $50,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON COUNTY YOUN…A KID AGAIN INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesA KID AGAIN INCDUNELAND YMCA INC: $40,272 · Human ServicesDUNELAND YMCA INCARTS COUNCIL OF INDIANAPOLIS INC: $250,000 · Arts & CultureARTS COUNCIL O…ASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 · Arts & CultureASPIRE HIGHER …BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO: $50,000 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentSAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 · Public BenefitDream Center Evansville: $50,000 · ReligionMad Co Sheriffs Dept Chaplaincy: $50,000 · ReligionJAMESON INC: $50,000 · Recreation & SportsL&A Park Foundation Inc: $41,415 · Recreation & Sports
Other$1,074,642Human Services$460,272Arts & Culture$300,000Youth Development$175,000Public Benefit$125,000Religion$100,000Recreation & Sports$91,415

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMARION COUNTY COMMISSION ON YOUTH INC: $270,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetSAGAMORE INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetDream Center Evansville: $50,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF MARSHALL COUNTY INC: $50,000 over 1y, 5.6% of budgetCONCORD CENTER ASSOCIATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetINDY PUBLIC SAFETY FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 4.8% of budgetWHITE'S RESIDENTIAL & FAMILY SERVICES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER NORTHWEST INDIANA INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTURNSTONE CENTER FOR CHILDREN & ADULTS WITH DISABILITIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetMad Co Sheriffs Dept Chaplaincy: $50,000 over 1y, 45% of budgetASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC: $50,000 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF NOBLESVILLE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetJAMESON INC: $50,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetCHANCES AND SERVICES FOR YOUTH INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetJAY COUNTY BOYS CLUB INC: $50,000 over 1y, 9.6% of budgetCHRISTAMORE HOUSE INC: $50,000 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetWASHINGTON COUNTY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $50,000 over 1y, 8.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF LAWRENCE CO: $50,000 over 1y, 3.7% of budgetA KID AGAIN INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetAGAPE THERAPEUTIC RIDING RESOURCES: $50,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetHAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC: $43,642 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetL&A Park Foundation Inc: $41,415 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetDUNELAND YMCA INC: $40,272 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetPHALEN LEADERSHIP ACADEMY - INDIANA: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF THE NORTHERN INDIANA CORRIDOR INC: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lilly Endowment IncIndiana Youth Institu…United Way of Central…Central Indiana Commu…Early Learning Indian…Second Helpings IncThe Indianapolis Foun…Centerpoint Energy Fo…Boys & Girls Clubs in…Indiana Sports Corpor…Teachers Treasures IncThe Mind Trust Inc
Lilly Endowment IncIN24× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lilly Endowment Inc · Indiana Youth Institute Inc · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Early Learning Indiana Inc · Second Helpings Inc · The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Centerpoint Energy Foundation Inc · Boys & Girls Clubs in Indiana Inc · Indiana Sports Corporation · Teachers Treasures Inc · The Mind Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 2021 All-Star Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 2021 All-Star Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    11report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 2021 All-Star’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home