Skip to content
1984 Grupe Fair Fund at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

1984 Grupe Fair Fund

To provide funds to local charities

$357k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$285k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2022 to 2025.

Housing & Shelter$619kHuman Services$200kEducation$30kYouth Development$25kEnvironment$25kEmployment$15kArts & Culture$10k
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 5 grants below total $345,264, the rows itemized in this filing. The $357,464 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $12,200 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k4 grants · $61k
  • $250k+1 grant · $285k
$15,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$265k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Gospel Center Rescue Mission$284,750
Fresno Stewardship Foundation$25,000
Goodwill Industries of San Jo$15,000
SJ Delta Community College Fo$10,514
Hoover Institution$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY22–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Hoover Institution: $10k → 8%Aspire Public Schools Foundat: $10k → 10%SJ Delta Community College Fo: $11k → 12%Fresno Stewardship Foundation: $25k → 19%Friends of the Children: $25k → 12%Gospel Center Rescue Mission: $285k → 12%Gospel Center Rescue Mission: $245k → 12%Gospel Center Rescue Mission: $80k → 12%Gospel Center Rescue Mission: $10k → 12%San Joaquin A Plus Inc: $10k → 12%Goodwill Industries of San Jo: $15k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
San Joaquin Partnership Inc

The organization's purpose is to promote san joaquin county and facilitate the creation of jobs within the county through its activities.

—
2
San Joaquin Community Foundation Inc

To provide leadership, promote a culture of giving & create resources that address the needs of san joaquin county.

Philanthropy
3
San Joaquin College of Law

The san joaquin college of law is a tax-exempt corporation organized for the purpose of operating a college of law for all applicants who meet the academic requirements.

—
4
Sjfb Foundation for Agricultural Education

To preserve the success of agriculture in san joaquin county through education. working with schools, community groups and other associations, the foundation provides resources and guidance to those involved in agricultural education.

Unclassified
5
Education San Joaquin

To engage in advocacy related to education policy issues in San Joaquin County. We build community awareness of educational issues provide forums in which candidates for public officials can learn about community needs and increase voter…

—
6
San Joaquin Pioneer & Historical Society

The mission of the museum is to inspire present and future generations to appreciate the fine arts and regional history by engaging our visitors' creative, social, and learning interests through exhibitions, programs, and events. this is…

—
7
San Joaquin County Office of Education Educational Foundation

To help preserve and improve the education of students under the jurisdiction of the san joaquin county office of education.

Education
8
Friends of the Children - San Francisco Bay Area

Impacting generational change by empowering youth who are facing the greatest obstacles through relationships with professional mentors - 12+ years, no matter what.

Education
9
Family Promise of San Joaquin County

To help reduce homelessness and support low income families in san joaquin county to achieve sustainable independence through a community-based response.

Human Services
10
United Way of San Joaquin County

To improve the lives of people by mobilizing the caring power of communities. we envision a community where generosity of individuals and businesses is coupled with services provided by community organizations to improve people's lives.

—
11
San Joaquin County Bar Foundation
Unclassified
12
San Jose State University Research Foundation

As an integral member of the san jose state university community, the san jose state university research foundation provides an entrepreneurial framework through which local, state and federal agencies, businesses and private foundations…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fresno Stewardship Foundation; the most unlike its peers is San Joaquin Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $619,250 · Housing & ShelterGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INCCommunity Partnership for Families of San Joaquin: $200,000 · Community ImprovementCommunity Partnership fo…FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentFRESNO STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION: $25,000 · EnvironmentGOODWILL INDUSTRIES OF SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY INC: $15,000 · OtherSAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $9,500 · EducationSan Joaquin Delta Community College Foundation: $10,514 · Philanthropy
Housing & Shelter$619,250Community Improvement$200,000Youth Development$25,000Environment$25,000Other$25,000Education$19,500Philanthropy$10,514

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetGOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC: $619,250 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetCommunity Partnership for Families of San Joaquin: $200,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFRESNO STEWARDSHIP FOUNDATION: $25,000 over 1y, 3.6% of budgetSan Joaquin Delta Community College Foundation: $10,514 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS: $9,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a set of overlaps that mostly run through this funder rather than between each other.

Amazonsmile Foundation
Amazonsmile FoundationWA2.4× affinity5 shared granteesties to 0 of 0Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 1984 Grupe Fair Fund funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 1984 Grupe Fair Fund. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 9 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 1984 Grupe Fair’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home