· Public charity
16 Tech Community Corporation
To foster and enhance entrepreneurship, innovation and economic opportunity through a place-based strategy.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $305,500 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $392,250 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $86,750 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k3 grants · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| JUST COMMUNITY INC | $100,000 |
| GROUNDWORK INDY INC | $50,000 |
| ST JOSEPH'S AT MARIAN UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| A PLUS CHILD CARE AND LEARNING CENTER | $25,000 |
| ASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC | $25,000 |
| MOTHER LOVES GARDEN INC | $25,000 |
| PER SCHOLAS INDIANAPOLIS | $25,000 |
| INDIANAPOLIS URBAN LEAGUE INC | $5,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $194k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 14%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 25% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $231k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- MUMarian University2× · 2020–2024 · $123k · revenue +46%
- ICINDY CONVERGENCE INC2× · 2020–2021 · $90k · revenue +104% · 63% of their budget
- AHASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC2× · 2020–2024 · $75k · revenue +141%
Funded once
- IHINNOVATION HUB BUILDING HOLDING CORPORATIONone grant, 2019 · $395k · revenue -21%
- BNBe Nimble Foundation Incgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $115k · revenue ×18 · 96% of their budget
- NANAPTOWN AFRICAN AMERICAN THEATRE COLLECTIVE INCone grant, 2023 · $100k · 75% of their budget
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Educate, Inspire, Connect and Mobilize Community Leaders to serve and strengthen greater Indianapolis.
Enroll indy helps families choose schools that meet their children's needs by providing a one-stop enrollment process, school information that is relevant and easy to understand, and data to inform school improvement in indianapolis,…
Faith in Indiana (formerly IndyCAN) is a catalyst for faith communities and marginalized peoples to act collectively for racial and economic justice in Indiana. FaithIN develops civic leaders directly impacted by inequality, awakens the…
KIPP Indy is a network of tuition-free, open-enrollment, college preparatory, public charter schools. KIPP Indy's mission is to create a network of schools that provides educationally underserved children with a rigorous education that…
Promote and educate indiana residents on the state's economic success and positive gains.
The asante art institute is an organiztion that uses the traditions of
Thrival academy indy is a humanities-focused high school which exposes students to diverse global perspectives through experiential learning and identity exploration in order to incubate educated global citizens and passionate community…
Providing youth and underserved individual's woodworking opportunities that develop creativity, learning and skill building.
The indiana plan recruits women and minorities to enter construction apprenticeship programs to encourage gainful employment.
We believe a fair and inclusive democracy is a key ingredient to propel Indiana Forward. We improve the lives of youth, people of color, women, and people in poverty in Indiana by building power thru community organizing and civic…
Our mission is to attract, engage, educate, and motivate young professionals of all varieties to make indianapolis an even greater place to live, work, and play.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christamore House Inc and the most unlike its peers is New Life Development Ministries Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 14 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds INNOVATION HUB BUILDING HOLDING CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Flanner House of Indianapolis ↗
- Who funds HAWTHORNE SOCIAL SERVICE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Marian University ↗
- Who funds Be Nimble Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds BELIEVERS UNITED IN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT ↗
- Who funds Just Community Inc ↗
- Who funds NAPTOWN AFRICAN AMERICAN THEATRE COLLECTIVE INC ↗
- Who funds INDY CONVERGENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE HIGHER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTAMORE HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER INDIANAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF GREATER INDIANAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD COLLEGIATE OF INDIANAPOLIS ↗
- Who funds Groundwork Indy Inc ↗
- Who funds Indiana University Foundation ↗
- Who funds Elevate Indianapolis Inc ↗
- Who funds NINE 13 INC ↗
- Who funds INDIANAPOLIS PARKS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds HERRON HIGH SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds PER SCHOLAS INC ↗
- Who funds TRIPLE T ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds PROACT COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS INC ↗
- Who funds APLUS CHILDCARE AND LEARNING CENTER ↗
- Who funds CODE BLACK INDY INC ↗
- Who funds Growing Places Indy ↗
- Who funds ARTE MEXICANO EN INDIANA INC ↗
- Who funds KURT VONNEGUT MEMORIAL LIBRARY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Indianapolis Foundation Inc · Central Indiana Community Foundation Inc · Lilly Endowment Inc · Nina Mason Pulliam Charitable Trust · United Way of Central Indiana Inc · The Mind Trust Inc · Allen Whitehill Clowes Charitable Foundation Inc · Nicholas H Noyes Jr Memorial Foundation · Lumina Foundation for Education Inc · Arthur Dean Family Foundation Inc · Second Helpings Inc · The Brave Heart Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization 16 Tech Community Corporation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.