Skip to content

· Private foundation

1248 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$98k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Health$97kReligion$73kEducation$45kInternational$31kHuman Services$26kPublic Benefit$23kAnimals$20kPublic Safety & Disaster$15kOther$0
02FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $90k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$1.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEXAS A&M FOUNDATION$25,000
HAVEN OF HOPE$25,000
HOPE PREGNANCY CENTERS OF BRAZOS$10,000
SAVE OUR STREETS MINISTRIES$10,000
WRITTEN IN RED$10,000
FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES$10,000
GOD BEHIND BARS$5,000
RB EYE FOUNDATION$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–24, $45k) land where the poverty rate runs at 19%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%WRITTEN IN RED: $10k → 13%MERCY PROJECT: $21k → 22%WRITTEN IN RED: $4k → 13%MERCY PROJECT: $10k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
NV
MO
KY
NM
TN
NC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

32%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 5 repeat orgs$249k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
15

Total granted

$120k
$161k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-28%
+11%

Still filing today

60%
27%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $88k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthReligionHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BM
    BREAKAWAY MINISTRIES INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $42k
  • MP
    MERCY PROJECT INC
    2× · 2019–2022 · $31k · revenue -28%
  • ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $23k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • DA
    DAR A LUZ BIRTH & HEALTH CENTER
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +9%
  • AT
    AMERICA THINKS INC
    one grant, 2023 · $23k
  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue +112%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
God's Light in the Darkness Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
3
House of Refuge Faith Based
Human Services
4
Samaritan's Purse

Samaritan's purse is a nondenominational evangelical christian organization providing spiritual and physical aid to hurting people around the world. since 1970, samaritan's purse has helped meet the needs of people who are victims of war,…

Religion
5
Jubal Band Ministries

Jubal band ministries mission is to invite people to become disciples of christian life with jesus.

Religion
6
Wounded Spirits Ministries

The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…

Recreation & Sports
7
Fsi-Freedom Seekers International

Freedom seekers international is a christian organization that exists to rescue the most severely persecuted for their religious faith in hostile and restrictive countries. through collaborative partnerships we deliver those who are…

Human Services
8
Found By Faith Inc
Religion
9
Julie Seals Ministries Inc

To share the gospel message to prisoners & teen challenge members through speaking engagements to offer hope that jesus christ can change their life.

Religion
10
Todd Worldwide Ministries
Housing & Shelter
11
Miracles From Heaven
International
12
Open Arms Ministry
Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fellowship of Christian Athletes; the most unlike its peers is Written in Red Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

BREAKAWAY MINISTRIES INC: $41,718 · OtherBREAKAWAY MINISTRIES INCHAVEN OF HOPE: $25,000 · OtherHAVEN OF HOPEAMERICA THINKS INC: $22,500 · OtherAMERICA THINKS INCKY BAPTIST DISASTER RELIEF: $15,000 · OtherKY BAPTIST DISASTER RELIEFHOPE PREGNANCY CENTERS OF BRAZOS: $10,000 · OtherHOPE PREGNANCY CENTERS OF BRAZOSVSCP - TAMU ANIMAL SCIENCE: $10,000 · OtherVSCP - TAMU ANIMAL SCIENCENM JR LIVESTOCK SALE ASSOCIATION: $10,000 · OtherNM JR LIVESTOCK SALE ASSOCIATIONHAYDEN HURST FAMILY FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · Other+8 more: $30,500 · Other+8 moreDAR A LUZ BIRTH & HEALTH CENTER: $50,000 · HealthDAR A LUZ BIRTH & HEALTH…ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $23,218 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEA…OPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENTER: $5,000 · HealthOPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENT…MERCY PROJECT INC: $30,718 · Human ServicesMERCY PROJECT…WRITTEN IN RED INC: $14,000 · Human ServicesWRITTEN IN RE…Texas A&M Foundation: $25,000 · EducationTexas A&M Fo…STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILL…S O S Ministries INC: $10,000 · ReligionOILFIELD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF HOUSTON: $10,000 · ReligionGOD BEHIND BARS INC: $5,000 · ReligionFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$170,718Health$78,218Human Services$44,718Education$40,000Religion$25,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDAR A LUZ BIRTH & HEALTH CENTER: $50,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetMERCY PROJECT INC: $30,718 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetTexas A&M Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $23,218 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWRITTEN IN RED INC: $14,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetS O S Ministries INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOILFIELD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF HOUSTON: $10,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DAR A LUZ BIRTH & HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds MERCY PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds Texas A&M Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WRITTEN IN RED INC ↗
  • Who funds S O S Ministries INC ↗
  • Who funds OILFIELD CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP OF HOUSTON ↗
  • Who funds FELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES ↗
  • Who funds GOD BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds OPEN ARMS PREGNANCY CENTER ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4× affinity6 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization 1248 Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from 1248 Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to 1248 Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to 1248 Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on 1248’s filings →

    More from the funding graph