Skip to content

Texas · Public charity

1 Million 4 Anna Foundation

Eradicate ewings sarcoma and provide support to those suffering with this disease and their families.

$1.7M
Granted FY2020
13
Itemized grants FY2020
13
Organizations funded FY2020
92%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2020
$1.5M
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2020
$24,866
Largest grant, FY2020
$778,233
Organizations funded a year
2 to 13
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
9

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 92% of the organizations 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 99% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
HealthPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY202013$1.5M92%
FY20193$155k67%
FY20182$45k0%
FY20172$235kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Health$1.9MHuman Services$25kEducation$8kPublic Safety & Disaster$5k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
MA
OR
PA
CA
CO
NC
GA
TX

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center$778,23310%
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cente$310,0003n/a
Children's Hospital Los Angeles$250,00010%
Seattle Children's Foundation$221,76510%
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia$86,60610%
Little Warrior Foundation Inc$75,000129%
Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta Inc$70,0002n/a
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$65,00020%
Rebecca Buchanan Brimmage Foundation$25,0001n/a
Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation$24,86610%
Show all 16 grantees
All grantees of 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center$778,23310%
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cente$310,0003n/a
Children's Hospital Los Angeles$250,00010%
Seattle Children's Foundation$221,76510%
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia$86,60610%
Little Warrior Foundation Inc$75,000129%
Childrens Healthcare of Atlanta Inc$70,0002n/a
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc$65,00020%
Rebecca Buchanan Brimmage Foundation$25,0001n/a
Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation$24,86610%
Sam Day Foundation$20,00015%
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation$20,00010%
Ruth Cheatham Foundation$8,0001n/a
Carson Sarcoma Foundation$6,00015%
Ready Fighter One$5,0001n/a
Carson Leslie Foundation$5,00012%

Where it is load-bearing

1 Million 4 Anna Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 1 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 11 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center: $778,233 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSeattle Children's Foundation: $221,765 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetThe Children's Hospital of Philadelphia: $86,606 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLittle Warrior Foundation Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 29% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation: $24,866 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSam Day Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 5.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital of Pittsburgh Foundation: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCarson Sarcoma Foundation: $6,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetCarson Leslie Foundation: $5,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift FundMA4.2× affinity4 shared granteesties to 1 of 1Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation?

Find your warmest path to 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation

How much does 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation give?
1 Million 4 Anna Foundation reported 13 itemized grants totaling $1,535,470, out of $1,738,484 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 13 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Health (98%), Human Services (1%), Education (0%).
Who are 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center ($778k), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Cente ($310k), Children's Hospital Los Angeles ($250k).
Does 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 92% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, Amazonsmile Foundation.
Where is 1 Million 4 Anna Foundation based?
1 Million 4 Anna Foundation is based in TX.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on 1 Million 4 Anna’s filings →

More from the funding graph