Skip to content
← Canadian charitiesAlso makes grants — grantmaker profile →

Alberta · Registered charity

THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION

THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION (Alberta) receives grants from 34 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$1,159,686 to it, the largest being DON WALLIS MINISTRIES INC. (C$453,020). 23 of them have funded it in more than one year.

C$5.9M
Revenue FY2024
34
Funders on record
C$1.2M
Grants received
C$2.3M
Net assets
23/34 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 10%

Against its field

THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION has grown faster than half of the 550 support of religion nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−12% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.4mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)6% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 550 support of religion nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 (C$3.9M) Expenses 100 (C$3.7M) Net assets 100 (C$1.4M)2018 Revenue 116 (C$4.6M) Expenses 116 (C$4.3M) Net assets 118 (C$1.7M)2019 Revenue 127 (C$5.0M) Expenses 128 (C$4.7M) Net assets 135 (C$2.0M)2020 Revenue 133 (C$5.2M) Expenses 134 (C$4.9M) Net assets 154 (C$2.2M)2021 Revenue 138 (C$5.4M) Expenses 136 (C$5.0M) Net assets 199 (C$2.9M)2022 Revenue 139 (C$5.5M) Expenses 148 (C$5.5M) Net assets 180 (C$2.6M)2023 Revenue 162 (C$6.4M) Expenses 161 (C$6.0M) Net assets 206 (C$3.0M)2024 Revenue 149 (C$5.9M) Expenses 177 (C$6.6M) Net assets 157 (C$2.3M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (149)Expenses (177)Net assets (157)Peer revenue range

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2024 2%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

39% of THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (61% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 514 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

C$224k
’17
C$261k
’18
C$246k
’19
C$278k
’20
C$379k
’21
−C$13k
’22
C$376k
’23
−C$701k
’24
0.4
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 15 funders to 16 funders, grant income rose C$85k → C$100k.

From the CRA filings of THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 34 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 39% of grant income and the top three 78%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION.

39%
largest funder
78%
top three
~4
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 68% · 2018 83% · 2019 44% · 2020 51% · 2021 82% · 2022 54% · 2023 46% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

58% of THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 68% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION draws 95% of its grant income from funders outside Alberta, across 7 regions in all.

In-province vs out-of-province, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Alberta out of province

Funder regions come from each funder’s own filing. C$9k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 region is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024 is still being filed and is shown unshaded; it does not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 34 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Government revenue THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION reports

Federal, provincial and municipal funding on the organization’s own T3010 return.

FY2024C$96k
  • 2% of FY2024 revenue
  • As filed, not traced to an award

Organizations like THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every charity on the CRA register — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Alberta

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own T3010 return, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

79% of spending goes to programs.

Program 79%Management 14%Fundraising 8%

Governance

3
board members

Questions and answers

Who funds THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION?
THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION (Alberta) receives grants from 34 organizations whose Canada Revenue Agency filings report C$1,159,686 to it, the largest being DON WALLIS MINISTRIES INC. (C$453,020). 23 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION have?
Canada Revenue Agency filings report 34 organizations giving C$1,159,686 in grants to THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION, 23 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION?
DON WALLIS MINISTRIES INC. is the largest funder on record, with C$453,020 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Alberta.

These figures are read directly from the CRA's published T3010 data: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 34 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported September 23, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · View the T3010 on the CRA register