Skip to content
Canadian charities

Kelowna, BC · Charitable organization

Business Men's Fellowship in Canada (B M F)

The various branches across the country hold regular meetings (monthly or more often) periodic raliies and conventions to impact their communities for jesus christ through the sharing of testimony teaching of the word of god and ministering the gospel of jesus christ.

C$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
2
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$1,200
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$46k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATIONC$1,200
OPEN ROAD CHAPELSC$200
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

31%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$7k · 3 repeat orgsC$16k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

C$7k
C$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+18%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +49%
  • TC
    THE CHAMPIONS CENTRE INCORPORATED
    4× · 2017–2020 · C$3k · revenue +45%
  • OR
    OPEN ROAD CHAPELS
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$800 · revenue -12%

Funded once

  • NC
    NEHEMIAH CONSTRUCTION MINISTRIES
    one grant, 2019 · C$5k · revenue -38% · 44% of their budget
  • TG
    THE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA
    one grant, 2019 · C$4k · revenue +14%
  • MH
    MEDICINE HAT AND DISTRICT FOOD BANK (1992) ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2021 · C$4k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Channel Canada

Promulgation of the gospel of jesus christ maily through media

—
2
Harvest Ministries Canada

Mercy ministry - food assistance medical transportation small appliances

—
3
Truth and Life Ministries

Freely providing for the poor in ontario texas and mexico. giving food clothing blankets tools school supplies bibles tracts and cash. preaching salvation through jesus christ.

—
4
Christian Life Tv International

Mission outreach to provide housing food and medical assistance.

—
5
Rhema Food Bank Ltd.
—
6
Stephen Marshall Ministries

Television and internet christian teaching ministry reaching canada and around the world with the christian massage of hope found in the bible to encourage and uplift people.

—
7
Parkland Christian Centre Inc.

Preaching the gospel of jesus christ food bank thrift store

—
8
Samaritan House Ministries Inc.

Housing & literacy programs food bank counselling programs drop-in centre homelessness initiative food services for the needy

—
9
Niagara Christian Gleaners

To feed the hungry people of the world by collecting excess produce and turning it into nutritious dried food

—
10
Christlike Ministries Inc.

Build housing in mexico for needy families; distribution of gospel tracts in canada united states and mexico share the gospel in churches prisons orphanages rehab centres and street ministry in canada and mexico

—
11
Freedom City Ministries

Sharing the gospel of jesus christ and the love of god - community based outreaches providing food clothing household items - telephone call-in programs

—
12
Great Commission Collective Canada

Planting churches training and coaching pastors training elders resourcing churches

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Champion's Centre Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Medicine Hat and District Food Bank (1992) Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
8/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetNEHEMIAH CONSTRUCTION MINISTRIES — C$5,000 over 1y, 44% of budgetTHE GIDEONS INTERNATIONAL IN CANADA — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDICINE HAT AND DISTRICT FOOD BANK (1992) ASSOCIATION — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION — C$3,525 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CHAMPIONS CENTRE INCORPORATED — C$2,975 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetEVANGEL TABERNACLE OF KELOWNA (EVANGEL CHURCH) — C$1,042 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAIRIE GLEANERS SOCIETY — C$830 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetOPEN ROAD CHAPELS — C$800 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PREGNANCY CENTRE — C$650 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAY OF HOPE — C$350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSALVATION ARMY NEW DIRECTIONS — C$350 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of South E…Link Charity Canada I…Strategic Charitable …CHIMP: Charitable Imp…Canadian Online Givin…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
United Way of South Eastern AlbertaAB8.1× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of South Eastern Alberta · Link Charity Canada Inc · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · CHIMP: Charitable Impact Foundation (Canada) · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 869566448:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Business Men's Fellowship in Canada (B M F)’s filings →