Coddles Harbour, NS · Charitable organization
Harbour Light Full Gospel Church
Sunday morning service every week at 1030am
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GUYSBOROUGH AND AREA FOOD BANK SOCIETY | C$1,512 |
| JEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES CANADA | C$1,512 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +68% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
6 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- JVJEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES CANADA8× · 2017–2024 · C$8k · revenue +41%
- TFTransport For Christ6× · 2017–2022 · C$5k · revenue +33%
- HHHarvest House Ministries6× · 2017–2022 · C$5k · revenue +267%
Funded once
- HHHarvest House Ministries Grand Manan Incone grant, 2017 · C$959 · revenue -3%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
7 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds JEWISH VOICE MINISTRIES CANADA ↗
- Who funds Transport For Christ ↗
- Who funds Harvest House Ministries ↗
- Who funds GUYSBOROUGH AND AREA FOOD BANK SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds THE MIRACLE CHANNEL ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds DAYSTAR TELEVISION NETWORK CANADA ↗
- Who funds Harvest House Ministries Grand Manan Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Abundance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.