Skip to content

North York, ON · Charitable organization

The United Church of Canada

I.

C$18M
Granted FY2024still arriving
345
Grants FY2024still arriving
10
Regions reached
C$918k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 345 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k162 grants · C$519k
  • C$10k–50k137 grants · C$2.8M
  • C$50k–250k27 grants · C$2.5M
  • C$250k+19 grants · C$13M
C$10,000
Median grant
10
Regions reached
C$153M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$918,031
FUNDY ST LAWRENCE DAWNING WATERSC$706,672
SHINING WATERS REGIONAL COUNCILC$683,922
WESTERN ONTARIO WATERWAYS REGIONALC$683,922
ANTLER RIVER WATERSHED REGIONAL COUNCILC$683,922
FIRST DAWN EASTERN EDGEC$681,922
REGIONAL COUNCIL 15C$681,922
CONSEIL REGIONAL NAKONHAKAC$681,922
EASTERN ONTARIO OUTAOUAIS REGIONAL COUNCILC$681,922
PRAIRIE TO PINE REGIONAL COUNCILC$681,922
PACIFIC MOUNTAIN REGIONAL COUNCILC$681,922
NORTHERN SPIRIT REGIONAL COUNCILC$681,922
LIVING SKIES REGIONAL COUNCILC$681,922
HORSESHOE FALLS REGIONAL COUNCILC$681,922
EAST CENTRAL ONTARIO REGIONAL COUNCILC$681,922
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 84% of grant dollars (C$102M). The 16% that went abroad (C$19M) is mapped below.

Which regions your grants reach

Ontario
C$36M
British Columbia
C$10M
Manitoba
C$8.4M
Quebec
C$7.3M
New Brunswick
C$6.7M
Alberta
C$5.8M
Saskatchewan
C$5.8M
Newfoundland and Labrador
C$3.7M
Nova Scotia
C$3.5M
Prince Edward Island
C$626k
Yukon
C$21k
Nunavut
C$19k
Northwest Territories
C$17k

Beyond home — 16% of all-years giving (C$19M)

34 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
ChinaC$1.9M · 8 grants
PHC$432k · 14 grants
ColombiaC$415k · 14 grants
ZMC$290k · 10 grants
ILC$279k · 14 grants
USC$229k · 7 grants
PalauC$227k · 4 grants
CubaC$227k · 9 grants
KenyaC$220k · 11 grants
ChadC$214k · 6 grants

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$106M · 679 repeat orgsC$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +5% for the ones you funded once.

679 repeat relationships — 226 still active in FY2024, 453 since wound down; 90 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

679
564

Total granted

C$106M
C$13M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+7%
+5%

Still filing today

78%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    CHINOOK WINDS REGIONAL COUNCIL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.7M · revenue +682% · 68% of their budget
  • LS
    LIVING SKIES REGIONAL COUNCIL
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.6M · revenue +96% · 76% of their budget
  • EC
    East Central Ontario Regional Council
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$3.4M · revenue +103% · 85% of their budget

Funded once

  • RC
    REGIONAL COUNCILS
    one grant, 2019 · C$6.9M
  • RC
    Regional Council 15
    one grant, 2020 · C$720k
  • MW
    Migrant Worker Community Program
    one grant, 2022 · C$140k · revenue +5% · 31% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christ United Church

Worship service weekly provide Pastoral Care Prayer Circle donate funds to denomination headquarters for overseas missionary activities provide outreach in the community and area.

—
2
Trinity United Church

Place of worship with weekly services both in person and online religious fellowship and outreach programs pastoral care

—
3
Leader United Church

We hold regular worship services and give pastoral care.

—
4
Trinity United Church

Weekly worship services. the minister administers the sacraments at these services.

—
5
St. Paul's United Church

We hold worship services weekly and offer pastoral care to the congregation

—
6
Trinity United Church

Sunday worship

—
7
Russell Pastoral Charge

Weekly worship services youth sunday school bible study united church women's group (ucw) and community pastoral care.

—
8
Wilkie Pastoral Charge United Church

Weekly church services sunday school for children youth group for teens

—
9
White Lake Bethesda United Church

Weekly worship services ucw pastoral care

—
10
Foam Lake United Church

weekly worship services pastoral care outreach weddings funerals baptism fundraising

—
11
Hanley United Church

Weekly services pastoral care

—
12
Grace United Church Hornepayne

Weekly worship services pastoral care

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity United Church and the most unlike its peers is Camp Lau-Ren. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

1024 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 1024 of the 1,333 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

128
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
202
Early backer (in before they grew)
965/1024
Grantees still filing
566/1024
Grew since you first funded

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFUNDY ST LAWRENCE DAWNING WATERS — C$3,900,106 over 8y, 76% of budgetCHINOOK WINDS REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$3,747,753 over 8y, 68% of budgetLIVING SKIES REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$3,602,626 over 8y, 76% of budgetEast Central Ontario Regional Council — C$3,421,114 over 8y, 85% of budgetNORTHERN SPIRIT REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$3,398,330 over 8y, 87% of budgetPRAIRIE TO PINE REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$3,306,385 over 8y, 79% of budgetEASTERN ONTARIO OUTAOUAIS REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$3,244,829 over 8y, 57% of budgetFIRST DAWN EASTERN EDGE — C$3,150,253 over 7y, 66% of budgetSandy Saulteaux Spiritual Centre — C$3,134,328 over 8y, 64% of budgetHORSESHOE FALLS REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$3,109,922 over 8y, 77% of budgetThe United Church Foundation — C$3,077,860 over 8y, 17% of budgetANTLER RIVER WATERSHED REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$3,054,703 over 6y, 78% of budgetCONSEIL REGIONAL NAKONHAKA — C$3,013,304 over 5y, 58% of budgetWESTERN ONTARIO WATERWAYS REGIONAL — C$2,960,884 over 6y, 55% of budgetPACIFIC MOUNTAIN REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$2,805,075 over 8y, 97% of budgetSHINING WATERS REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$2,710,486 over 5y, 56% of budgetREGIONAL COUNCIL 15 — C$2,261,957 over 4y, 70% of budgetSt Andrew's College — C$1,735,356 over 8y, 15% of budgetVICTORIA UNIVERSITY — C$1,371,391 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetAtlantic School Of Theology — C$1,154,846 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetKAIROS — C$843,919 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetCentre For Christian Studies — C$811,605 over 8y, 26% of budgetVancouver School Of Theology — C$761,376 over 8y, 3.6% of budgetCANADIAN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES — C$655,282 over 8y, 8.2% of budgetATLANTI CHRISTIAN TRAINING CENTRE — C$649,627 over 8y, 15% of budgetFive Oaks Christian Workers Centre — C$580,892 over 7y, 20% of budget1 JUST CITY — C$561,867 over 8y, 12% of budgetAll Native Circle Conference — C$512,570 over 2y, 56% of budgetWESLEY URBAN MINISTRIES — C$473,467 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetUnited Theological College — C$466,180 over 6y, 62% of budgetThe United Church Observer — C$388,390 over 5y, 6.6% of budgetEast District Chaplaincy Commitee — C$352,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONS UNITING — C$346,499 over 8y, 84% of budgetBissell Centre — C$334,873 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetCanadian UNICEF Committee — C$260,340 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetToronto Urban Native Ministry — C$256,253 over 8y, 40% of budgetPearce Williams Christian Centre — C$255,976 over 7y, 10% of budgetHouse of Lazarus — C$250,923 over 8y, 6.1% of budgetUnited Presbyterian Campus Ministry — C$236,055 over 6y, 43% of budgetAnglican United Refugee — C$232,032 over 7y, 22% of budgetRIVER BEND INTEGRATED — C$230,887 over 7y, 58% of budgetSt Andrew's UC Regional Ministry Fund — C$228,900 over 5y, 18% of budgetGitanyow Sustainability Fund — C$224,000 over 2y, 4.9% of budgetOur Place Society — C$222,258 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetHazelton Pastoral Charge — C$221,735 over 7y, 37% of budgetNaramata Centre Society — C$213,274 over 8y, 6.3% of budgetKANESATAKE UNITED CHURCH — C$201,897 over 8y, 80% of budgetFred Victor Centre — C$200,761 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FUNDY ST LAWRENCE DAWNING WATERS ↗
  • Who funds CHINOOK WINDS REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LIVING SKIES REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds East Central Ontario Regional Council ↗
  • Who funds NORTHERN SPIRIT REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE TO PINE REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds EASTERN ONTARIO OUTAOUAIS REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds FIRST DAWN EASTERN EDGE ↗
  • Who funds Sandy Saulteaux Spiritual Centre ↗
  • Who funds HORSESHOE FALLS REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds The United Church Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ANTLER RIVER WATERSHED REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds CONSEIL REGIONAL NAKONHAKA ↗
  • Who funds WESTERN ONTARIO WATERWAYS REGIONAL ↗
  • Who funds PACIFIC MOUNTAIN REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds SHINING WATERS REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds REGIONAL COUNCIL 15 ↗
  • Who funds St Andrew's College ↗
  • Who funds VICTORIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Atlantic School Of Theology ↗
  • Who funds KAIROS ↗
  • Who funds Centre For Christian Studies ↗
  • Who funds Vancouver School Of Theology ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN COUNCIL OF CHURCHES ↗
  • Who funds ATLANTI CHRISTIAN TRAINING CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds Five Oaks Christian Workers Centre ↗
  • Who funds 1 JUST CITY ↗
  • Who funds All Native Circle Conference ↗
  • Who funds WESLEY URBAN MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds United Theological College ↗
  • Who funds The United Church Observer ↗
  • Who funds East District Chaplaincy Commitee ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The Presbyteries of Toronto Conference CorporationON28.7× affinity48 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Presbyteries of Toronto Conference Corporation · The United Church of Canada Foundation / Fondation de L'Église Unie Du Canada · Horseshoe Falls Regional Council - the United Church of Canada · Pacific Mountain Region - The United Church of Canada · Northern Spirit Regional Council - the United Church of Canada · Chinook Winds Region - The United Church of Canada · The Finance and Extension Board of Conseil régional Nakonha:ka Regional Council Le Conseil des finances et de l'expansion du Conseil régional Nakonha:ka Regional Council · The Toronto United Church Council · Living Skies Regional Council - the United Church of Canada · Eastern Ontario Outaouais Regional Council - The United Church of Canada · Conseil régional Nakonha:ka Regional Council · Third Avenue United Church

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 1333 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 108102435:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on United Church of Canada’s filings →