Ottawa, ON · Charitable organization
Eastern Ontario Outaouais Regional Council - The United Church of Canada
To further the religious beliefs + word of the united church of canada by carrying out the responsibilities + duties of the regional council as stated in the manual of the united church of canada
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k13 grants · C$53k
- C$10k–50k8 grants · C$194k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RIDEAU HILL CMAP | C$37,150 |
| ZION MEMORIAL UNITED | C$30,900 |
| HOUSE OF LAZARUS | C$29,700 |
| CENTRE 507 | C$27,750 |
| ST.ANDREWS UNITED- BURCHBURY | C$27,574 |
| CAMP LAU REN | C$17,500 |
| GOLDEN LAKE CAMP | C$13,500 |
| KANATA UNITED | C$10,000 |
| CARLINGTON CHAPLAINCY | C$6,000 |
| KNOX UNITED | C$5,900 |
| NAVAN VARS UNITED | C$5,410 |
| WALL ST UNITED | C$5,000 |
| PORT ELGIN UNITED | C$5,000 |
| WESLEY UNITED | C$5,000 |
| TRINITY ST.ANDREWS | C$5,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +31% since the first grant, against +19% for the ones you funded once.
20 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- C5CENTRE 5076× · 2019–2024 · C$178k · revenue +534%
- CLCAMP LAU-REN.6× · 2019–2024 · C$113k · revenue +31% · 27% of their budget
- RHRIDEAU HILL CMAP3× · 2022–2024 · C$67k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- MOMontreal & Ottawa Conferenceone grant, 2018 · C$167k
- MOMontreal & Ottawa Conferenceone grant, 2017 · C$152k
- HOHOUSE OF LAZURUSone grant, 2022 · C$36k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Sunday worship
Weekly worship
Weekly worship services. the minister administers the sacraments at these services.
Place of worship with weekly services both in person and online religious fellowship and outreach programs pastoral care
United church worship
Weekly worship services communion weddings funerals
Worship Services, Bible Study Groups and Discussion Groups, Pastoral Care
Worship service weekly provide Pastoral Care Prayer Circle donate funds to denomination headquarters for overseas missionary activities provide outreach in the community and area.
Church services and religious activities
Religious activities - worship services
Worship services held on sundays
Weekly worship services ucw pastoral care
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trinity United Church of Canada and the most unlike its peers is Camp Lau-Ren. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CENTRE 507 ↗
- Who funds Montreal & Ottawa Conference ↗
- Who funds CAMP LAU-REN. ↗
- Who funds GOLDON LAKE CAMP ↗
- Who funds RIDEAU HILL CMAP ↗
- Who funds ZION MEMORIAL UNITED ↗
- Who funds ST.ANDREWS UNITED- BURCHBURY ↗
- Who funds KANATA UNITED ↗
- Who funds ELGIN PORTLAND PASTORAL CHARGE ↗
- Who funds EMMANUEL UNITED CHURCH ↗
- Who funds FIRST UNITED CHURCH ↗
- Who funds ALWYN COMMUNITY OF FAITH ↗
- Who funds ALGONQUIN COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds CARLINGTON CHAPLAINCY ↗
- Who funds OTTAWA WEST END CHAPLAINCY ↗
- Who funds TRINITY ST. ANDREWS UNITED ↗
- Who funds MACKAY UNITED ↗
- Who funds CALVIN UNITED CHURCH ↗
- Who funds RIDEAU PARK UNITED ↗
- Who funds KNOX UNITED ↗
- Who funds NAVAN VARS UNITED ↗
- Who funds PORT ELGIN UNITED ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Church of Canada · The United Church of Canada Foundation / Fondation de L'Église Unie Du Canada · Ottawa Community Foundation / Fondation Communautaire d'Ottawa · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario · My Tribute Gift Foundation · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.