Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Cote St. Luc, QC · Charitable organization

The Tzaddik Foundation

The charity provided events for yeshivas and seminaries to promote their activities and collected donations for them.

C$7k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$4k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$378
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$32k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Jewish Women's Orthodox League of LubavitchC$3,577
L'ACADEMIE BETH RIVKAH POUR FILLES/BETH RIVKAH ACADEMY FOR GC$1,525
Rabbinical College of CanadaC$1,000
Zichron Chaim CharityC$378
Charity Tzedakah MontrealC$260
Merkaz Chasidei WiznitzC$180
Or MenachemC$100
Hatzolas Yisroel d'ArizalC$36
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

34%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$17k · 4 repeat orgsC$33k to everyone else

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
10

Total granted

C$17k
C$31k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+86%

Still filing today

100%
90%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    Congrégation Beth Chabad C.S.L.
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$8k · revenue +26%
  • JW
    Jewish Women's Orthodox League of Lubavitch
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$5k · revenue +35%
  • ZC
    Zichron Chaim Charity
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$660 · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • VM
    Vaad Mishmeres Mitzvos
    one grant, 2017 · C$12k
  • CF
    CharityEx Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$10k · revenue +335%
  • TT
    Tomchei Tmimim Bnei Menachemgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · C$3k · revenue +134%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
4
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
5
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
6
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
7
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
8
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
9
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
10
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
11
Yeshiva Gedolah L'ecole D'etudes Superieures De Montreal

The charity opertes a school for jewish children

—
12
Chasdei Levy Yitzcok

To relieve poverty by providing reasonable financial means for food shelter and other supplies or services to needy persons in israel

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization and the most unlike its peers is CharityEx Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
11/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCharityEx Foundation — C$9,880 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCongrégation Beth Chabad C.S.L. — C$8,102 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetJewish Women's Orthodox League of Lubavitch — C$5,377 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetCOLLEGE RABBINICAL DU CANADA / RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA — C$3,100 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTomchei Tmimim Bnei Menachem — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLe Centre Juif de Montréal-Ouest-Chabad Westminster — C$2,400 over 1y, 5.0% of budgetKollel Yismach Moshe — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetL'ACADEMIE BETH RIVKAH POUR FILLES/BETH RIVKAH ACADEMY FOR G — C$1,525 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChai Center Chabad — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZichron Chaim Charity — C$660 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFondation des Enfants de Tsfat — C$360 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCharity Tzedakah Montreal — C$260 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMerkaz Chasidei Wiznitz — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMenucha Vesimcha — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Chabad Cote St. Luc — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOr Menachem — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHatzolas Yisroel d'Arizal — C$36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMikveh Israel — C$18 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Community Foun…Congregation Bais Men…Rayjo Charitable TrustCongregation de L'Aid…Fondation Familiale G…Hatzolas Yisroel D'Ar…École Mesivta Kerem M…Centre Chabad De Vill…Federation CjaL'Organisation de la …Dubrofsky Foundation /Aaron and Susan Liebe…
Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de MontréalQC14.6× affinity14 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Congregation de L'Aide Fraternelle Ezras Achim · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · École Mesivta Kerem Menachem Mesivta Kerem Menachem School · Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of The Town of Mount Royal · Federation Cja · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Dubrofsky Foundation / · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 875281602:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Tzaddik’s filings →