Skip to content

Ingersoll, ON · Charitable organization

Sweaburg United Church

Conduct weekly worship services in the Community to Perpetuate the Church

C$6k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$3k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$258k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Church of Canada M&SC$3,413
Operation SharingC$1,607
VON Sakura HouseC$507
Women's Emergency Centre/DASOC$250
Food GrainsC$200
Days For GirlsC$100
Alzhelmer's AssociationC$100
Camp BiminiC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$38k · 7 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +22% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
4

Total granted

C$38k
C$1k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+22%
+6%

Still filing today

86%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$400 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada M&S
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$27k · revenue +22%
  • OS
    Operation Sharing
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$6k · revenue +381%
  • VS
    VON Sakura House
    7× · 2017–2023 · C$3k · revenue +951%

Funded once

  • OS
    Operation Sharing
    one grant, 2022 · C$850
  • CC
    Canadian Cancer Society
    one grant, 2020 · C$100 · revenue -4%
  • HB
    Harvest Bowl
    one grant, 2023 · C$100 · revenue +6%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Care Camps of Canada

Mission: To give joy hope and healing power of the outdoors to children with cancer and their families at a specialized oncology camp. Vision: With your help Care Camps will provide hope and healing to every child and family member…

—
2
Camp Mcgovern

Providing underprivileged children with the opportunity to go to camp. Participants must be involved in Big Brothers Big Sisters programs around Ontario or be associated with local United Way member agencies.

—
3
Camp Quality Canada

The organization conducts camp based programming including summer in-person and virtual camps off-season weekend retreats and reunions and year round community based programs for the entire family. the organization operates camps in…

—
4
The Children's Aid Society of Oxford County

Child protection and family counselling services

—
5
United Way of Oxford

United Way Oxford the largest non-government funder of social services in Oxford County works to strengthen our community through mobilization of collective action to create measurable cumulative lasting change that improves lives and…

—
6
Victorian Order of Nurses Toronto-York Region Community Corporation

VON Canada has been pioneering care at home for over 120 years. Today we are a highly-trusted non-profit organization that works with our clients employees volunteers and partners to provide innovative clinical personal and social support…

—
7
Camp Banting

Providing a camp for children living with type 1 diabetes.

—
8
Victorian Order of Nurses Middlesex-Elgin Community Corporation

Von has been pioneering care at home for over 120 years. today we are a highly-trusted non-profit organization that works with our clients employees volunteers and partners to provide innovative clinical personal and social support to…

—
9
The Children's Aid Foundation of York Region

Children's camps york region children's aid society special needs program

—
10
Camp Hornby Society

Supporting outdoor adventure camp for blind children

—
11
Ontario Christian Assembly Incorporated

Religious camp programs provided

—
12
Kids in Camp

Kids in camp provides financial assistance to make it possible for children from low-income homes or with special health or other special needs to attend an ontario camps association camp. participating camps support the initiative by…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mennonite Community Services of Southern Ontario and the most unlike its peers is Camp Bimini. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
7/13
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada M&S — C$26,645 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetOperation Sharing — C$5,710 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVON Sakura House — C$3,248 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWomen's Emergency Centre/DASO — C$1,130 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Tanner Inc. — C$620 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetVON Sakura House — C$607 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAlzhelmer's Association — C$400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFood Grains — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Cancer Society — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Bimini — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHarvest Bowl — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDays For Girls — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLions Club — C$50 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oxford Community FoundationON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oxford Community Foundation · St. Paul's United Church · Foldens Pastoral Charge · Peace United Pastoral Charge · College Avenue United Church · Dr. Leonard Reeves Foundation · United Way of Oxford · Abundance Canada · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Rbc Foundation/Rbc Fondation · Charities Aid Foundation Canada · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119207363:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Sweaburg United Church’s filings →