Skip to content
Canadian charities

Woodstock, ON · Private foundation

Dr. Leonard Reeves Foundation

Donating funds to charitable organizations and other qualifed donees in the county of oxford ontario.

C$261k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$100k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$16k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$45k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$200k
C$5,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$6.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WOODSTOCK HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$100,000
SOUTH GATE CENTRE INC.C$100,000
THE CITY OF WOODSTOCK (MUNICIPALITY)C$45,000
WAR AMPSC$5,000
LIONS FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$3,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OXFORD COUNTYC$3,000
THE SUNSHINE FOUNDATION OF CANADAC$2,500
IGNAMO HOMEC$2,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.4M · 17 repeat orgsC$44k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

17 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2024, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
10

Total granted

C$1.4M
C$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+10%

Still filing today

76%
80%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • WH
    WOODSTOCK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$500k · revenue +23%
  • VS
    VON Sakura House
    6× · 2017–2023 · C$251k · revenue +951% · 27% of their budget
  • SG
    SOUTH GATE CENTRE INC.
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$225k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • WA
    WOODSTOCK ART GALLERY (MUNICIPALITY) SUBSECTION 118.1(1) OF
    one grant, 2019 · C$20k
  • FB
    FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · C$6k · revenue -64%
  • CO
    CYCLES OF LIFE SUPPORTIVE TRANSITIONAL LIVING
    one grant, 2022 · C$5k · revenue -2%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Victim Assistance Services of Oxford County

Victim assistance services of oxford county provides assistance and referrals 24 hours a day 7 days a week for victims of crime and tragic circumstances in the woodstock and all communities within oxford county.

—
2
Woodstock Rotary Festival of Music

The organization of the annual festival of music for children of oxford county.

—
3
Woodstock Little Theatre Incorporated

Bringing the performing arts to woodstock and oxford county through amateur theatre children's theatre and summer programs for children and youth.

—
4
Woodstock Hospital

The provision of public general hospital care to the citizens of the City of Woodstock and the county of Oxford. The hospital is also a 'Schedule 1' psychiatric facility. The provision of service to persons with developmental disabilities…

—
5
Rotary Club of Woodstock-Oxford Charitable Benefit Trust

Charity looks for outside requests for funding donates money raised through fundraisers and donations to make life better for the less fortunate. working on housing for persons that can not afford housing. emergency relief where needed…

—
6
Woodstock Childcare Inc.

Woodstock childare inc. is a non-profit facility that provides childcare services for children.

—
7
Woodstock and District Developmental Services

Provide supports/services for people with developmental disabilities through programs: family support: provide support/assistance for families with children/young adults comjunity activity: provide day time services re:…

—
8
The Wood's Homes Foundation

The foundation works in direct support of wood's homes society and wood's homes. all donations received are distributed to wood's homes society and wood's homes which are registered charities serving children and families with special…

—
9
Oxford County 4-H Association

Youth programs - clubs for members teaching hands on and leadership skills

—
10
Camp Winston Foundation

Camp winston is focused on four pillars which support our campers and their families through: summer programs for children and teens year-round respite sessions year-round support for campers and their caregivers and training our staff and…

—
11
Wood's Homes Society

Wood's homes society is the parent organization of wood's homes and the wood's homes foundation and owns all off the properties used by wood's homes. wood's homes is registered charity serving children and families with special education…

—
12
Woodlands Wildlife Sanctuary

Rescue Rehabilitation and Release of orphaned sick and injured wildlife. Conduct educational programs for schools interest groups and other organizations

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United Way of Oxford and the most unlike its peers is Woodstock Fanshawe Singers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 29 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWOODSTOCK HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$500,000 over 4y, 4.1% of budgetVON Sakura House — C$251,260 over 6y, 27% of budgetSOUTH GATE CENTRE INC. — C$225,000 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetUNITED WAY OXFORD — C$95,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetWAR AMPS — C$22,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIngamo homes — C$14,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetTHE SUNSHINE FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$11,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVICTORIA'S QUILTS CANADA — C$7,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST BAPTIST CHURCH — C$5,607 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetSWEABURG UNITED CHURCH — C$5,300 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetCYCLES OF LIFE SUPPORTIVE TRANSITIONAL LIVING — C$5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetOperation sharing — C$4,500 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCHRISTIAN BLIND MISSION — C$4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF OXFORD COUNTY — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLIONS FOUNDATION OF CANADA — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NAVY LEAGUE OF CANADA — C$2,500 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetWDSTK FANSHAWE SINGERS — C$2,500 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetThe Donkey Sanctuary of Canada — C$1,300 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDASO — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCaroline Smith Medical Fund — C$1,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetLakeshore United Church — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSWEABURG LIONS CLUB — C$500 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetCanadian Wildlife Federation — C$120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oxford Community Foun…United Way of OxfordUnited Way Waterloo R…St. Mary's Council No…Maranatha Christian R…Covenant Christian Re…United Way Golden Hor…Muslim Association of…Foldens Pastoral Char…Sweaburg United ChurchCollege Avenue United…Lloyd Carr-Harris Fou…
Oxford Community FoundationON16.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oxford Community Foundation · United Way of Oxford · United Way Waterloo Region Communities · St. Mary's Council No. 3212 Charitable Welfare Trust · Maranatha Christian Reformed Church · Covenant Christian Reformed Church of Woodstock · United Way Golden Horseshoe · Muslim Association of Woodstock · Foldens Pastoral Charge · Sweaburg United Church · College Avenue United Church · Lloyd Carr-Harris Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 29 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 860858521:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Dr. Leonard Reeves’ filings →