Skip to content

Ingersoll, ON · Charitable organization

Foldens Pastoral Charge

Usual church activities-weekly church services and provide pastoral care

C$3k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$600
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$243k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
OPERATION SHARING WOODSTOCKC$1,578
VON-SAKURA HOUSEC$600
INGERSOLL INTER-CHURCHC$600
PLAN INTERNATIONAL CANADA INCC$540
INGAMO HOMESC$60
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$42k · 9 repeat orgsC$5k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +62% since the first grant, against +34% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

C$42k
C$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+62%
+34%

Still filing today

78%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TU
    THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$18k · revenue +22%
  • OS
    OPERATION SHARING WOODSTOCK
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$6k · revenue +188%
  • II
    INGERSOLL INTER-CHURCH
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +115%

Funded once

  • TU
    THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA
    one grant, 2020 · C$4k
  • VO
    VON OXFORDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue +34%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Victorian Order of Nurses Middlesex-Elgin Community Corporation

Von has been pioneering care at home for over 120 years. today we are a highly-trusted non-profit organization that works with our clients employees volunteers and partners to provide innovative clinical personal and social support to…

—
2
Victorian Order of Nurses for Canada - Ontario Branch / Infirmières de l'ordre de Victoria du Canada - Succursale Ontario

Von has been leading home and community care in canada for over a century. we were among the first organizations in the country to offer home care and public health nursing and today we provide home and community support services to over…

—
3
Victorian Order of Nurses for Canada - Nova Scotia Branch / Les InfirmiÉRes De L'ordre De Victoria Du Canada-Succursale Nouvelle-ÉCosse

Von has been leadingg home and community care in canada for over a century. we were amoung the first organizations in the country to offer home care and public health nursing and today we provide home and community support services to over…

—
4
Victorian Order of Nurses Grey-Bruce Community Corporation

Von has been pioneering care at home for over 102 years. today we are a hightly-trusted non-profit organization that works with our clients employees volunteers and partners to provide innovative clinical personal and social support to…

—
5
Victorian Order of Nurses Toronto-York Region Community Corporation

VON Canada has been pioneering care at home for over 120 years. Today we are a highly-trusted non-profit organization that works with our clients employees volunteers and partners to provide innovative clinical personal and social support…

—
6
Victim Assistance Services of Oxford County

Victim assistance services of oxford county provides assistance and referrals 24 hours a day 7 days a week for victims of crime and tragic circumstances in the woodstock and all communities within oxford county.

—
7
Women's Hostels Incorporated

The charity operates a 36 bed emergency shelter and community support outreach program for women and their children that are facing violence poverty homelessness and oppression. at the shelter we provide shelter safety counselling referral…

—
8
The Children's Aid Society of Oxford County

Child protection and family counselling services

—
9
Inn From the Cold Society

Provide overnight emergency shelter and housing to homeless families. provide referrals for counseling and housing as well as providing food and clothing to assist families with obtaining and substaining housing. provide financial and…

—
10
Indwell Community Homes

Indwell creates and operates affordable housing communities that support people seeking health wellness and belonging. Indwell's affordable supportive housing programs primarily support individuals with low incomes and disabilities…

—
11
Osborne House Inc.

Support services include 24 hour crisis line counselling children's counselling and follow up services for women and children that have been abused by an intimate partner.

—
12
The Inn of Windsor

The organization provides residential care and semi independent living; individual group and family counselling; anger management conflict resolution and effective parenting strategies to youths and their families by intervening and…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ingersoll & District Inter-Church and the most unlike its peers is Camp Tanner Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA — C$18,386 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SHARING WOODSTOCK — C$6,333 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetINGERSOLL INTER-CHURCH — C$4,850 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetINGAMO HOMES — C$3,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetVON-SAKURA HOUSE — C$2,600 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCamp Tanner — C$2,080 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetPLAN INTERNATIONAL CANADA INC. — C$1,620 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDASO - Domestic Abuse Service of Oxford — C$500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVON OXFORD — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE UNITED CHURCH OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SHARING WOODSTOCK ↗
  • Who funds INGERSOLL INTER-CHURCH ↗
  • Who funds INGAMO HOMES ↗
  • Who funds VON-SAKURA HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds Camp Tanner ↗
  • Who funds PLAN INTERNATIONAL CANADA INC. ↗
  • Who funds DASO - Domestic Abuse Service of Oxford ↗
  • Who funds VON OXFORD ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Covenant Christian Reformed Church of WoodstockON9.2× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Covenant Christian Reformed Church of Woodstock · United Way of Oxford · St. Paul's United Church · Westminster United Church · Sweaburg United Church · College Avenue United Church · Dr. Leonard Reeves Foundation · Maranatha Christian Reformed Church · Oxford Community Foundation · Lloyd Carr-Harris Foundation · United Way Golden Horseshoe · Private Giving Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 107950669:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Foldens Pastoral Charge’s filings →