Skip to content

Selkirk, MB · Charitable organization

Selkirk Pastoral Charge

Advancement of religion.

C$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$332
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$135
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Selkirk Food BankC$332
Sandy Saulteaux CentreC$175
Affirm UnitedC$160
Centre for Christian StudiesC$135
Selkirk Fire Department (Fire Prevention Program)C$82
Nova HouseC$82
St. Andrews CollegeC$75
Friends of BroadviewC$75
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$20k · 13 repeat orgsC$3k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +15% since the first grant, against -27% for the ones you funded once.

13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

C$20k
C$3k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
-27%

Still filing today

62%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$82 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SF
    Selkirk Food Bank
    3× · 2017–2020 · C$5k · revenue +15%
  • NH
    Nova House
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$4k · revenue +5%
  • MH
    Manitoba Harm Reduction Network
    2× · 2021–2022 · C$815 · revenue +264%

Funded once

  • 1J
    1 Just City
    one grant, 2021 · C$1k · revenue -27%
  • PP
    PRAIRIE PINE REGIONAL COUNCIL
    one grant, 2019 · C$913 · revenue -29%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$450

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Northern Spirit Regional Council - the United Church of Canada

Provide support advice and services to Communities of Faith in the areas of human resources property archives and leadership training Provide oversight of Communities of Faith and supporting them in their life and work and ensure…

—
2
Living Skies Regional Council - the United Church of Canada

Provide support advice and services to Communities of Faith in the areas of human resources property archives and leadership training. Provide oversight of Communities of Faith and supporting them in their life and work and ensure…

—
3
Shining Waters Region - the United Church of Canada

Regional councils are on oversight body of the united church of canada. swrc offers training and administration support to united churches in the toronto and muskoka area.

—
4
Western Manitoba Women's Regional Resource Centre Inc.

The womens resource centre provides programs services and counselling on issues affecting women and children including family violence while encouraging respect diversity and equality with a feminist perspective.

—
5
Upstream Ottawa Mental Health Community Support

Provide a choice of permanent affordable housing and or ongoing flexible support to individuals with long-term mental health illness. to assist the individuals to live at their optimal level of functioning within the community.

—
6
Volunteer Manitoba Inc.

To provide services in the field of voluntarism that promotes and stimulates citizen participation in charitable organizations. referral - to act as a recruitment and referral service (centre) for volunteers. contact comunity information…

—
7
Urban Circle Training Centre Inc.

Training programs to first nations/aboriginal people

—
8
Outsaskatoon Inc.

Outsaskatoon is saskatoon and area's 2slgbtq community centre and service provider. we believe in a bolder braver and safer future for all. we strive towards this by providing support services youth housing and education and research…

—
9
Winnipeg Presbytery - the United Church of Canada

To provide oversight and support to the United Church congregations within the Winnipeg Presbytery. Activities include Christian education, pastoral care, social action, stewardship, personal matters, administrative support to…

—
10
Eden Health Care Services Inc

Organization provides management and administrative support to a group of companies who provide wrap around mental health services in southern manitoba. the services include a mental health centre residential housing and supports…

—
11
Ywca Westman Inc.

We house individuals requiring supervision & support. we provide safe emergency shelter and counselling for individuals and children who are at risk due to relationship violence. we provide couselling information education and referrals to…

—
12
House Blend Ministries Inc.

To create communities through whole life Christian discipleship with an among residents of inner city neighbourhoods in Winnipeg. To operate a community-oriented Christian religious order in Winnipeg in association with MBCM. The…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre for Christian Studies Canada Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Nova House Inc.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSelkirk Food Bank — C$5,363 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetNova House — C$3,683 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetWest Broadway Ministries — C$2,560 over 3y, 0.3% of budget1 Just City — C$1,045 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPRAIRIE PINE REGIONAL COUNCIL — C$913 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetManitoba Harm Reduction Network — C$815 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSandy Saulteux Centre — C$810 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetST. ANDREWS COLLEGE — C$665 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE OBSERVER — C$665 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN STUDIES — C$455 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER SOCIETY — C$344 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAFFIRM UNITED — C$178 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Selkirk Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Nova House ↗
  • Who funds West Broadway Ministries ↗
  • Who funds 1 Just City ↗
  • Who funds PRAIRIE PINE REGIONAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds Manitoba Harm Reduction Network ↗
  • Who funds Sandy Saulteux Centre ↗
  • Who funds ST. ANDREWS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE OBSERVER ↗
  • Who funds CENTRE FOR CHRISTIAN STUDIES ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds AFFIRM UNITED ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Winnipeg FoundationMB10.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Winnipeg Foundation · The United Church of Canada · The United Church of Canada Foundation / Fondation de L'Église Unie Du Canada · Westworth United Church · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · North Kildonan United Church · Selkirk & District Community Foundation Inc. · All Charities Campaign · Abundance Canada · Strategic Charitable Giving Foundation · Charitable Gift Funds Canada Foundation / Fonds de Bienfaisance Canada · United Way East Ontario / Centraide Est de L'Ontario

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119144673:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Selkirk Pastoral Charge’s filings →