Skip to content

Selkirk, MB · Public foundation

Selkirk & District Community Foundation Inc.

1.

C$680k
Granted FY2024still arriving
39
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$146k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 39 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k23 grants · C$84k
  • C$10k–50k12 grants · C$250k
  • C$50k–250k4 grants · C$347k
C$5,612
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$19M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LORD SELKIRK SCHOOL DIVISIONC$145,950
Individual grant recipientC$88,509
INTERLAKE EASTERN HEALTH FOUNDATIONC$61,908
ST. AMANT CENTREC$50,236
R.M. OF ST. ANDREWSC$42,812
R.M. OF ST. CLEMENTSC$31,960
INCLUSION SELKIRKC$28,069
HEARTHSTONE COMMUNITY GROUPC$27,000
SELKIRK RENEWAL CORPORATIONC$20,000
EAST SELKIRK EARLY LEARNING CENTREC$18,000
CHIEF PEGUIS HERITAGE PARKC$17,219
SELKIRK & DISTRICT CURLING CLUBC$17,100
UNITED FOR LITERACYC$15,000
TURNING LEAF SUPPORT SERVICESC$11,927
SELKIRK & DISTRICT COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONC$11,020
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 83% of grant dollars (C$2.7M). The 17% that went abroad (C$582k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 17% of all-years giving (C$582k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$2.9M · 51 repeat orgsC$446k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships — 30 still active in FY2024, 21 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
54

Total granted

C$2.9M
C$377k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+15%
+17%

Still filing today

65%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$70k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • LS
    LORD SELKIRK SCHOOL DIVISION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$552k · revenue +11%
  • IE
    INTERLAKE EASTERN HEALTH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$257k · revenue +14%
  • SA
    ST. AMANT CENTRE
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$251k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • CO
    CIRY OF SELKIRK-SELKIRK COMMUNITY RENEWAL
    one grant, 2022 · C$27k
  • RR
    RED RIVER NORTH TOURISM
    one grant, 2023 · C$23k
  • RO
    R.M. OF ST. CLEMENTS - UKRAINIAN HOME & READING SOCIETY
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$23k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Selkirk Waterfront Development Corporation
—
2
Selkirk and Interlake Mental Health Support Centre Inc.

Mental health support and services group

—
3
Selkirk and District Handi Bus Inc
—
4
East Interlake Watershed District

To provide soil and water management decisions on resource conservation and environmental awareness for the eastern interlake area of manitoba

—
5
Selkirk and District Emergency Response System

Supply install and troubleshoot lifeline equipment for seniors those who are disabled and convalescing in the city of selkirk rm of st andrews and rm of st clements. educate the community and healthcare providers of the benefits of…

—
6
Seaforth Co-Operative Children's Centre Inc

The centre provides early learning and care programs for children ranging in age from infancy to school age. the centre operates year-round

—
7
Sandy Lake Recreational Association Inc.

The sandy lake recreational association inc. provides recreation opportunities to sandy lake and surrounding areas. activities include curling and pickle ball. the association also provides a gathering place for the community.

—
8
Selkirk College Foundation

The selkirk college foundation provides scholarships bursaries and other awards to students attending selkirk college.

—
9
Swim Saskatchewan Foundation Inc
—
10
Southeast College Education Foundation Inc.

Programs / projects to support education and training in southeast saskatchewan

—
11
South Interlake Recreation Centre Inc.

Recreation Programs- Hockey Ringette Figure Skating and Training Camps

—
12
South Interlake Fifty-Five Plus Inc

Provide direct and indirect services for those 55 years of age and over in the stonewall region. programs include recreation and fitness activities educational and cultural prorams healthy lifestyle programs social programs and events.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Selkirk & District Community Foundation Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Rossdale-Vitretz Ukrainian Dance Incorporated. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 114 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
15
Early backer (in before they grew)
59/65
Grantees still filing
41/65
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetLORD SELKIRK SCHOOL DIVISION — C$552,096 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetINTERLAKE EASTERN HEALTH FOUNDATION — C$257,079 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST. AMANT CENTRE — C$250,818 over 7y, 2.7% of budgetASSOCIATION COMMUNITY LIVING/INCLUSION SELKIRK — C$201,387 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetNova House Inc — C$147,942 over 8y, 4.9% of budgetMARINE MUSEUM OF MANITOBA — C$142,534 over 8y, 13% of budgetGrowing Years Family Resource Centre/Selkirk Friendship Cent — C$95,009 over 8y, 1.6% of budgetGAYNOR FAMILY REGIONAL LIBRARY — C$78,734 over 8y, 6.4% of budgetHEARTHSTONE COMMUNITY GROUP — C$77,522 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSelkirk & Community Foundation — C$70,904 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetRotary Club of Selkirk — C$57,310 over 6y, 21% of budgetRed River Basin Commission — C$55,000 over 5y, 7.8% of budgetUNITED FOR LITERACY (FRONTIER COLLEGE) — C$43,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHAND IN HAND DAY CARE INC. — C$29,923 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetBETEL HOME FOUNDATION — C$28,275 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetARTISTS IN HEALTHCARE — C$25,645 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetGordon Howard Senior Centre Inc, — C$21,520 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetST. CLEMENTS ANGLICAN CHURCH-RED RIVER CHURCHES REFUGEE TEA — C$20,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetOUR DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN — C$19,980 over 8y, 5.8% of budgetMANITOBA BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION — C$18,894 over 4y, 4.7% of budgetSELKIRK COMMUNITY ART CENTRE — C$18,800 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetSTARS AIR AMBULANCE — C$18,172 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCLANDEBOYE COMMUNITY CLUB — C$17,339 over 4y, 12% of budgetSELKIRK DAYCARE — C$14,032 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetTURNING LEAF SUPPORT SERVICES — C$12,927 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetROSSDALE UKRAINIAN DANCE GROUP — C$11,500 over 5y, 7.9% of budgetSURVIVOR'S HOPE CRISIS CENTRE — C$10,763 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetST. JOHN AMBULANCE — C$10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInterlake-Eastern Health Foundation — C$10,000 over 1y, 6.0% of budgetManitoba Archaeological Society — C$10,000 over 1y, 35% of budgetST. GEORGE WAKEFIELD ANGLICAN CHURCH — C$8,227 over 8y, 2.8% of budgetTROYANDA UKRAINIAN DANCE — C$8,000 over 1y, 6.9% of budgetSt Andrews Child Care Inc — C$7,506 over 2y, 0.5% of budget4565119 MANITOBA ASSOCIATION INC./INTERLAKE ART BOARD — C$6,000 over 1y, 8.8% of budgetINTERLAKE SCHOOL DIVISION — C$5,700 over 2y, 21% of budgetSELKIRK FOOD BANK — C$5,612 over 2y, 4.5% of budgetInterlake Co-Op Nursery Inc. — C$5,309 over 2y, 3.9% of budgetSWIMMINGLY INC. — C$5,300 over 4y, 7.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF LOWER FORT GARRY — C$5,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetKnox Presbyterian Church — C$5,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetMANITOBA HARM REDUCTION NETWORK — C$5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetPROJECT LINUS — C$4,740 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetVICTORIA BEACH CLUB — C$4,160 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetLITTLE BRITAIN UNITED CHURCH — C$4,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetSt. Andrews Heritage Committee — C$3,300 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetEast Beaches Regional Complex Inc. — C$3,300 over 2y, 15% of budgetABUNDANT LIFE LUTHERN CHURCH-AREA HAMPER PROGRAM — C$3,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetEARTH RANGERS — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LORD SELKIRK SCHOOL DIVISION ↗
  • Who funds INTERLAKE EASTERN HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ST. AMANT CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds ASSOCIATION COMMUNITY LIVING/INCLUSION SELKIRK ↗
  • Who funds Nova House Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARINE MUSEUM OF MANITOBA ↗
  • Who funds CHIEF PEGUIS HERITAGE PARK ↗
  • Who funds Growing Years Family Resource Centre/Selkirk Friendship Cent ↗
  • Who funds GAYNOR FAMILY REGIONAL LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds HEARTHSTONE COMMUNITY GROUP ↗
  • Who funds Selkirk & Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Rotary Club of Selkirk ↗
  • Who funds Red River Basin Commission ↗
  • Who funds UNITED FOR LITERACY (FRONTIER COLLEGE) ↗
  • Who funds HAND IN HAND DAY CARE INC. ↗
  • Who funds BETEL HOME FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS IN HEALTHCARE ↗
  • Who funds Gordon Howard Senior Centre Inc, ↗
  • Who funds ST. CLEMENTS ANGLICAN CHURCH-RED RIVER CHURCHES REFUGEE TEA ↗
  • Who funds OUR DAILY BREAD SOUP KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds MANITOBA BRAIN INJURY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SELKIRK COMMUNITY ART CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds STARS AIR AMBULANCE ↗
  • Who funds CLANDEBOYE COMMUNITY CLUB ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Rotary Club of Selkirk Charitable TrustMB17.6× affinity13 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Rotary Club of Selkirk Charitable Trust · All Charities Campaign · The Winnipeg Foundation · Thomas Sill Foundation Inc. · The Lutheran Church of the Good Shepherd · The Brandon Area Community Foundation Inc. · Selkirk Pastoral Charge · Lac Du Bonnet & District Charitable Foundation Inc. · Westshore Community Foundation Inc. · The Interlake Community Foundation Inc · The Pollard Family Foundation Inc. · The Ernst Hansch Foundation Inc.

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 114 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under foundations.

Source object 897470464:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Selkirk & District’s filings →