Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Ridgetown, ON · Charitable organization

Mount Zion Presbyterian Church

Weekly worship services and bible study providing ministry for adults and children.

C$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$1k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$459k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHILDREN'S TREATMENT CENTRE FOUNDATIONC$1,250
C-K WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTREC$1,000
C-K HOSPICE FOUNDTIONC$750
MUNICIPALITY C-K (FREE SKATING SPONSORSHIP)C$535
FREEHELPCKC$500
RIDGETOWN DISTRICT AGRICUTURAL SOCIETYC$500
C-K COMMUNITY LIVINGC$500
RIDGETOWN 150 COMMITTEEC$500
UNITED CHRISTIAN BROADCASTERSC$500
NAAHII RIDGE PUBLIC SCHOOLC$500
ST MICHAEL'S CATHOLIC SCHOOLC$500
SCOUTS CANADAC$300
FARM SAFE FOUNDATIONC$300
VACATION BIBLE SCHOOL (ERIC STREET STREET UNITED CHURCH)C$300
THE SALVATION ARMYC$265
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

40%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$10k · 10 repeat orgsC$15k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
17

Total granted

C$10k
C$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+23%

Still filing today

90%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 43% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CW
    C-K WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTRE
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$2k · revenue +3%
  • UC
    UNITED CHRISTIAN BROADCASTERS
    3× · 2019–2024 · C$2k · revenue +14%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    3× · 2018–2024 · C$1k · revenue +499%

Funded once

  • KC
    KENESSERIE CAMPgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$3k · revenue +66%
  • RK
    RIDGE K.I.D.S.graduated
    one grant, 2018 · C$1k · revenue +123%
  • SM
    ST. MICHAEL'S SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · C$750

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chatham-Kent Health Alliance

The organization provide a full range of hospital services including 24 hour emergency service.

—
2
Chatham Outreach for Hunger Inc.

The organization operates a food bank for local residents of the municipality of chatham-kent

—
3
Ridgetown Kiwanis Club Foundation

Support for chatham-kent hospital foundation scholarship

—
4
Chatham Kent Community Foundation

Funding other charities that provide for community needs. types of charities supported during the year include education health arts & culture recreation social services heritage and the environment

—
5
United Way of Chatham-Kent

The organization's principal purpose is to develop teamwork among the social philanthropic and charitable agencies servicing the community and their constituencies in the interest of the financial suppott of such agencies and the effective…

—
6
Crime Prevention and Safety Board Chatham-Kent
—
7
Chatham-Kent Animal Rescue

Dogs and cats from owner surrenders are placed intially in foster homes and aranged for permanent adoption. dogs and cats from domestic abuse homes are housed in a safe environment and returned when it is safe to do so or put up for…

—
8
Chatham-Kent Victim Services

Short-term emotional support and practical assistance to the victims of crime tragic circumstances and disaster

—
9
Chatham-Kent Children's Safety Village

Children's education programs on safety matters - building small village to support children's summer camps

—
10
Chatham - Kent Crime Stoppers Inc.

A non-profit organization assisting law enforcement agencies by providing rewards to citizens who provide information leading to the arrest and conviction of lawbreakers

—
11
Mental Health Network of Chatham Kent

Mental health peer support and self help programs family support programs client advocacy community education meal programs

—
12
Chatham-Kent Community Health Centres

Health promotion programs such as: medical care counselling health promotion diabetes program ect.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham-Kent Hospice Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ridgetown District Agricultural Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/24
Grantees still filing
15/24
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKENESSERIE CAMP — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetC-K WOMEN'S CRISIS CENTRE — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED CHRISTIAN BROADCASTERS — C$1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$1,415 over 3y, 2.7% of budgetVACATION BIBLE SCHOOL (ERIE STREET UNITED CHURCH) — C$1,250 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S TREATMENT CENTRE FOUNDATION — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetC-K HOSPICE FOUNDTION — C$1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSCOUTS CANADA — C$1,050 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetRIDGE K.I.D.S. — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFARMSAFE FOUNDATION — C$600 over 2y, 7.3% of budgetHIGHGATE DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — C$550 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetC-K HOSPICE — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFREEHELPCK — C$500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHATHAM HOPE HAVEN NEW BEGGINGS MINISTRIES — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetC-K COMMUNITY LIVING — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGETOWN DISTRICT AGRICUTURAL SOCIETY — C$500 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetRIDGETOWNY DISTRICT MINISTERIAL ASSOCIATION — C$300 over 2y, 3.1% of budgetHABITAT FOR HUMANITY C-K — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIDGETOWN ROYAL CANADIAN LEGION BR 243 POPPY FUND — C$200 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetEvangel Hall Mission — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHURCH OF THE ADVENT — C$150 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetHabitat for Humanity — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FOOD FOR CHILDREN — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCrieff Hills Community — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Chatham…Chatham Kent Communit…Emmanuel Congregation…Lindsay Road Congrega…The Gathering Place C…St. Clair Catholic Di…Ursuline Religious of…Howard Mutual Foundat…Rotary Club of Chatha…McGeachy Charitable F…St. James Presbyteria…Rotary Club of Chatha…
United Way of Chatham-KentON13× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Chatham-Kent · Chatham Kent Community Foundation · Emmanuel Congregational Church of Ridgetown · Lindsay Road Congregation United Church · The Gathering Place Community Church · St. Clair Catholic District School Board · Ursuline Religious of the Diocese of London in Ontario · Howard Mutual Foundation · Rotary Club of Chatham Sunrise Service Fund · McGeachy Charitable Foundation · St. James Presbyterian Church · Rotary Club of Chatham Service Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 37 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 133194571:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Mount Zion Presbyterian Church’s filings →