Skip to content

Dresden, ON · Charitable organization

Lindsay Road Congregation United Church

Weekly worship services Ongoing Pastoral Care Donate to Community and United Church Appeals Maintain a church building and hall Part of a 2 point pastoral charge sharing one minister.

C$9k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$7k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$200
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$361k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Church of Canada (M&S)C$7,120
Kenesserie Camp IncorporatedC$1,345
Salvation Army Chatham-Kent MinistriesC$200
United Church of CanadaC$130
Chatham-Kent Health Alliance FoundationC$100
Chatham-Kent Hospice FoundationC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

98%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$74k · 20 repeat orgsC$2k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

20 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

20
6

Total granted

C$74k
C$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+32%
+22%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$100 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • UC
    United Church of Canada (M&S)
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$61k · revenue +22%
  • KC
    Kenesserie Camp Incorporated
    3× · 2022–2024 · C$3k · revenue +48%
  • SA
    Salvation Army Chatham-Kent Ministries
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue ×11

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · C$585
  • LM
    London Muslim Mosque
    one grant, 2019 · C$500 · revenue +22%
  • WI
    Women's Inter-Church Council of Canada
    one grant, 2020 · C$333 · revenue -25%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Karis Disability Services

Karis Disability Services is a non-profit faith-based charitable organization providing supports and services to more than 2 500 people who experience disabilities and their families in Ontario and Saskatchewan. With more than 200…

—
2
Chatham-Kent Health Alliance

The organization provide a full range of hospital services including 24 hour emergency service.

—
3
Chatham Outreach for Hunger Inc.

The organization operates a food bank for local residents of the municipality of chatham-kent

—
4
United Way of Chatham-Kent

The organization's principal purpose is to develop teamwork among the social philanthropic and charitable agencies servicing the community and their constituencies in the interest of the financial suppott of such agencies and the effective…

—
5
Chatham-Kent Victim Services

Short-term emotional support and practical assistance to the victims of crime tragic circumstances and disaster

—
6
Fh Canada

Food for the Hungry (FH) Canada part of the global FH family is a Christian not-for-profit organization dedicated to ending poverty worldwide. With partners across Canada and the world FH walks alongside vulnerable communities throughout…

—
7
FreeHelpCK

The purpose of the organization is to help eliminate poverty in the chatham-kent community and provide assistance for everyone regardless of race ethnicity creed gender orientation or background. programs operated by the charity include:…

—
8
Chatham-Kent Community Health Centres

Health promotion programs such as: medical care counselling health promotion diabetes program ect.

—
9
Chatham Kent Community Foundation

Funding other charities that provide for community needs. types of charities supported during the year include education health arts & culture recreation social services heritage and the environment

—
10
United Way Waterloo Region Communities

United Way Waterloo Region Communities is dedicated to helping people live better lives in every one of the seven communities we serve. We are the largest funder of social programs in Waterloo Region second only to government. We are…

—
11
Neighbourlink Chatham-Kent

Networking of churches assisting people linking them with existing social services and support groups provide transportation to appointments food and other basic needs provide life skill training visiting personal financial budgeting.…

—
12
Mental Health Network of Chatham Kent

Mental health peer support and self help programs family support programs client advocacy community education meal programs

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham-Kent Hospice Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Dresden Community Church. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
14/18
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Church of Canada (M&S) — C$60,515 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKenesserie Camp Incorporated — C$2,705 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSalvation Army Chatham-Kent Ministries — C$1,600 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetRidgetown Campus Chaplaincy Program — C$1,200 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetUniversity of Guelph Ridgetown Campus Chaplaincy Program — C$1,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDRESDEN COMMUNITY FOODBANK — C$958 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCanadian Foodgrains Bank — C$900 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChatham-Kent Hospice Foundation — C$725 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFoundation of Chatham-Kent Health Alliance — C$700 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetChatham-Kent Women's Centre — C$600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Living Chatham-Kent — C$600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetLondon Muslim Mosque — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChristian Horizons (Canada) — C$400 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWomen's Inter-Church Council of Canada — C$333 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHope and Healing — C$300 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Food for Children — C$300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChristian Horizons Global — C$200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetChatham-Kent Hospice Foundation — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Church of Canada (M&S) ↗
  • Who funds Kenesserie Camp Incorporated ↗
  • Who funds Salvation Army Chatham-Kent Ministries ↗
  • Who funds Ridgetown Campus Chaplaincy Program ↗
  • Who funds University of Guelph Ridgetown Campus Chaplaincy Program ↗
  • Who funds DRESDEN COMMUNITY FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Foodgrains Bank ↗
  • Who funds Chatham-Kent Hospice Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Foundation of Chatham-Kent Health Alliance ↗
  • Who funds Chatham-Kent Women's Centre ↗
  • Who funds Community Living Chatham-Kent ↗
  • Who funds London Muslim Mosque ↗
  • Who funds Christian Horizons (Canada) ↗
  • Who funds Women's Inter-Church Council of Canada ↗
  • Who funds Hope and Healing ↗
  • Who funds Canadian Food for Children ↗
  • Who funds Christian Horizons Global ↗
  • Who funds Chatham-Kent Hospice Foundation ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Chatham-KentON11.1× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Chatham-Kent · The Gathering Place Community Church · Mount Zion Presbyterian Church · Calvin Christian School Society Wallaceburg · St. Clair Catholic District School Board · Chatham Kent Community Foundation · Trinity Christian Centre · The Merlin Senior Citizens Friendship Club · Thamesville United Church · McGeachy Charitable Foundation · Ursuline Religious of the Diocese of London in Ontario · Vancouver Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 27 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under christianity.

Source object 119020204:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Lindsay Road Congregation United Church’s filings →