Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Chatham, ON · Charitable organization

Howard Mutual Foundation

To operate a community health care centre by providing medical health and support services for the general public.

C$9k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
Regions reached
C$5k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$2,500
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RIDGETOWN AND AREA ADULT ACTIVITY CENTREC$5,000
MARY WEBB CENTREC$2,500
LOWER THAMES CONSERVATION AUTHORITYC$1,500
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$121k · 7 repeat orgsC$17k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +56% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 6 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
2

Total granted

C$121k
C$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+56%
+17%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 56% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$4k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    CHATHAM-KENT HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION
    4× · 2018–2021 · C$45k · revenue +38%
  • RA
    RIDGETOWN AND AREA ADULT ACTIVITY CENTRE
    5× · 2018–2022 · C$34k · revenue +60%
  • GC
    GREENWOOD CEMETARY
    3× · 2017–2019 · C$14k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • CH
    CHATHAM-KENT HOSPICE
    one grant, 2018 · C$8k · revenue +17%
  • RK
    Ridgetown Kiwanis Club Foundation
    one grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue -94%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chatham-Kent Health Alliance

The organization provide a full range of hospital services including 24 hour emergency service.

—
2
Wingham & District Hospital

A rural acute care facility providing emergency acute inpatient and complex care as well as outpatient laboratory and diagnostic services

—
3
Kent County Agricultural Hall of Fame Association

To recognize a person or persons by induction into the kent county agricultural hall of fame. for demonstrating unselfish achievement within the realm of agriculture & service to the rural community of chatham-kent and/or beyond.

—
4
Chatham Kent Community Foundation

Funding other charities that provide for community needs. types of charities supported during the year include education health arts & culture recreation social services heritage and the environment

—
5
Huntingdon County Hospital Foundation

Donating to local hospital

—
6
Chatham - Kent Health Alliance Helping Hands Auxiliary

The auxilliary operates a retail gift shop in the chatham site of the chatham-kent health alliance. the net proceeds are used to support the community.

—
7
Wallaceburg Trails Association

• continuing to advocate for further tril development and increased awareness of trail accessibility • continuing to work in conjuctioon with the chatham kent trails committee and chatham - kent council

—
8
Ridgetown District High School Student Aid Fund

To distribute commencement awards to graduating students

—
9
Chatham-Kent Public Education Student Assistnace Foundation

Providing grants and awards to students of the lambton kent district school board

—
10
Windham Cemetery Company

Maintaining the windham cemetery

—
11
Rotary Club of Kitchener-Westmount Charitable Foundation

Fundraising to support local charities

—
12
Rawdon Hills Health Centre Association
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chatham-Kent Health Alliance Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ridgetown District Agricultural Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
10/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHATHAM-KENT HEALTH ALLIANCE FOUNDATION — C$45,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetRIDGETOWN AND AREA ADULT ACTIVITY CENTRE — C$33,800 over 5y, 8.0% of budgetGREENWOOD CEMETARY — C$13,500 over 3y, 7.3% of budgetCHILDREN`S TREATMENT CENTRE FOUNDATION OF CHATHAM-KENT — C$10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetRYAL CANADIAN LEGION — C$10,000 over 2y, 46% of budgetCHATHAM-KENT HOSPICE — C$7,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetRIDGETOWN DISTRICT AGRICULTURAL SOCIETY — C$6,000 over 2y, 9.3% of budgetRidgetown Kiwanis Club Foundation — C$5,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetHIGHGATE AGRICULTURE SOCIETY — C$2,900 over 2y, 11% of budgetMARY WEBB CENTRE — C$2,500 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetLOWER THAMES CONSERVATION AUTHORITY — C$1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Chatham Kent Communit…Mount Zion Presbyteri…McGeachy Charitable F…My Tribute Gift Found…Vancouver FoundationCanadian Online Givin…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps Canadon
Chatham Kent Community FoundationON11.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Chatham Kent Community Foundation · Mount Zion Presbyterian Church · McGeachy Charitable Foundation · My Tribute Gift Foundation · Vancouver Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2022-09-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2022. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under core health care.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 848036513:2022-09-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Howard Mutual’s filings →