Skip to content

North York, ON · Private foundation

Mivaser Tov Foundation

Advancement of religion

C$203k
Granted FY2023
14
Grants FY2023
2
Regions reached
C$158k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2023 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under C$10k11 grants · C$10k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$34k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$158k
C$847
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTEC$158,347
YESHIVAT YESODEI HATORAC$20,000
YESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHUC$14,479
YESHIVAS NACHALAS TZVIC$5,430
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$1,700
THE FOUNDATIONS OF TORAHC$847
KOL YAKOVC$847
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF OHR SOMEYACHC$360
MOSDOS BOBOVC$180
KAV SHALOMC$136
SINAI CHILD CAREC$120
RAJEC$100
VIZNITZ INSTITUTIONC$72
BNEI ZION CHARITY FUNDC$36
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$294k · 6 repeat orgsC$30k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.

6 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2023, 0 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

C$294k
C$14k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+25%
+8%

Still filing today

100%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$15k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$175k · revenue +68%
  • Y
    YYH
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$50k · revenue +25%
  • J
    JHF
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$14k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • BB
    BNOS BY
    one grant, 2022 · C$6k · revenue +8%
  • KA
    KOLLEL AVREICHEM
    one grant, 2022 · C$4k · revenue -15%
  • B
    BYESgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$2k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
3
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
4
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
5
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
7
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
8
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
9
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
10
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
11
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
12
Beth Hamedrash L'horaah

Operate a school for teaching religious studies

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foundations of Torah Charitable Organization and the most unlike its peers is Kupas Hachesed Meoroth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/20
Grantees still filing
12/20
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI INSTITUTE — C$175,347 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYYH — C$50,026 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNACHLAS TZVI — C$30,398 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetKOL YAKOV — C$24,512 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLAH ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$14,479 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetJHF — C$13,900 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBNOS BY — C$5,750 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetKOLLEL AVREICHEM — C$4,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetBYES — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVMM — C$495 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF OHR SOMEYACH — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBNEI ZION — C$286 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOSDOS BOBOV — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAV SHALOM — C$136 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSINAI CHILD CARE — C$120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORNTO SEPHARDIC KOLLE — C$120 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBY OF THORNHILL — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRAJE — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial FundON11.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · Ari and Naomi Klein Charitable Trust · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · Zolty Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · My Charity Fund · Yira Charity Foundation · The Marder Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2023-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2023. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Possibly out of date. A more recent return (FY2024) is on record, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this charity itemized its gifts to donees.

Source object 747412708:2023-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Mivaser Tov’s filings →