Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

North York, ON · Private foundation

Yira Charity Foundation

To receive and maintain a fund or funds and to aplly all or part of the principal and income therefrom from time to time to qualified donees as defined in subsection 149.1(1) of the income tax act.

C$429k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$429k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$428,610
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$9k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$428,610
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 62% of grant dollars (C$704k). The 38% that went abroad (C$429k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 38% of all-years giving (C$429k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

52%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$589k · 14 repeat orgsC$544k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
33

Total granted

C$589k
C$116k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-4%
+5%

Still filing today

86%
82%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$429k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$346k · revenue +27%
  • YT
    YESHIVA TORAS CHAIM
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$23k · revenue +58%
  • KH
    KISHKAN HATORAH
    2× · 2022–2023 · C$13k · revenue +41%

Funded once

  • MT
    MAHARAM TAV FUND
    one grant, 2023 · C$38k · revenue +18%
  • KH
    KUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH
    one grant, 2022 · C$19k
  • YG
    YESHIVA GEDOLA ZICHRON SHMAYAHU
    one grant, 2023 · C$12k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
3
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
4
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
5
Kollel Tosh

The charity advances education and religion by operating a school for post graduate talmudic students as well as providing scholarships and bursaries.

—
6
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
7
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
8
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
9
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
10
The Yeshivah Scholarship Fund of Israel

Provide scholarships to needy students persuing studies of higher education in israel.

—
11
Yeshiva Student Religious Education Fund

The organization has been set up to provide religious education.

—
12
Yeshivat Yesodei Hatora

The charity maintained an elementary school for the teaching of the moral and religious principles of the jewish orthodox faith

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Foundations of Torah Charitable Organization and the most unlike its peers is Ahavat Chesed R M B H. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 48 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/42
Grantees still filing
23/42
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH HERITAGE — C$346,124 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCONG. BOBOV — C$89,827 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetBNEI TZION — C$41,930 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetMAHARAM TAV FUND — C$37,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetYESHIVA TORAS CHAIM — C$22,700 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS CHERNOBEL — C$21,150 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetKISHKAN HATORAH — C$13,150 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOLA ZICHRON SHMAYAHU — C$11,900 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCONGREGATION OHEL TORAH — C$8,200 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMESIVTA LUBAVITCH TORONTO — C$8,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYAD ELIEZER — C$5,850 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION BELZ MONTREAL — C$5,360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSINAI CHILD CARE — C$5,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF SEMINARY YESHIVA — C$3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTORAS MOSHE — C$3,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI — C$2,750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONGREGATION CHEVES ACHIM — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA MISHKAN YOSEF — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTORONTO SEPHARDIC KOLLEL — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR ADVANCED JUDAIC STUDIES — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAHAVATH ISRAEL — C$1,800 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetCANADIAN RCCS — C$1,500 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetKESHER YISRAEL — C$1,350 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetVIZNITZ INSTITUTION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAIS MEIR — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHATZOIAS YISROEL D'ARIZAL — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO CHEDER — C$900 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCCBY — C$760 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetKUPAT TORAH VECHESED — C$750 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMAZEL CHARITY — C$750 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LIFE LONG LEARNING — C$720 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKAYLA CHIILDREN CENTRE — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZRAS CHOLIM — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMCB — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO MIKVEH — C$180 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetRENEWAL — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA NACHLAS TZVI — C$72 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION — C$65 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetOHEL SARAH CANADA — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTORONTO ERUV — C$50 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Chaim Moshe Fried…The F&R Hauer Charita…Moral Arc FoundationHeitner Charitable Fo…The George Hofstedter…The IV Charitable Fou…Zichron Binyomin Char…J & H Feldman Charita…The Daniel and Vera R…The Gross Family Foun…Mae Day FoundationJack and Doris Bistri…
The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial FundON24.8× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation · Moral Arc Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · The IV Charitable Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · J & H Feldman Charitable Foundation · The Daniel and Vera Rubinstein Charitable Foundation · The Gross Family Foundation · Mae Day Foundation · Jack and Doris Bistricer Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 48 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 756001004:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Yira Charity’s filings →