Skip to content

Saint-Laurent, QC · Private foundation

La Fondation Familiale Albert & Jimmy Lévy the Albert & Jimmy Lévy Family Foundation

C$32k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
Regions reached
C$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k13 grants · C$7k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$25k
C$360
Median grant
2
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SPANISH & PORTUGUESE SYNAGOGUEC$15,000
ADDICTION OUTREACHC$10,000
MADA COMMUNITY CENTERC$1,350
MIRIAM FOUNDATIONC$1,000
CHABAD OF CHULA VISTAC$1,000
CENTRE CHABADC$1,000
CHABAD OF THE TOWNC$555
CONGREGATION BELZC$360
CHABAD WESTMINSTERC$360
LA FOUNDATION DES ECOLES JPPS-BLALIKC$360
VMMC$252
CAISSE BETH YOSSEFC$226
BEN WELDER EDUCATION CENTERC$180
MENUCHA VESIMCHAC$126
CHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREALC$26
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

80%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$101k · 16 repeat orgsC$26k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +58% since the first grant, against +39% for the ones you funded once.

16 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
19

Total granted

C$101k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+58%
+39%

Still filing today

100%
95%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TS
    THE SPANISH & PORTUGUESE SYNAGOGUE
    4× · 2017–2024 · C$28k · revenue +22%
  • CO
    CHADBAD OF THE TOWN
    6× · 2017–2024 · C$20k · revenue +98%
  • MO
    MIGDAL OHR
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$14k · revenue +17%

Funded once

  • IY
    INSTITUTE YAVNEgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$3k · revenue +149%
  • ÉM
    ÉCOLE MAIMONIDE
    one grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue +17%
  • CM
    CONG. MAGHEN DAVID ADOMgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · C$1k · revenue +214%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
2
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
3
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
4
Fondation Yam Hatalmud/Yam Hatalmud foundation

To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.

—
5
Communauté Sepharade Hekhal Shalom

Synagogue

—
6
Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation

Organiser et maintenir une synaguogue avec l'object de la pratique et l'avancement de la religion.

—
7
Yeshiva Gedolah L'ecole D'etudes Superieures De Montreal

The charity opertes a school for jewish children

—
8
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
9
Yeshiva Merkaz Torah B'montreal-Central Rabbinical Seminary
—
10
Fonds Immobilier Satmar/ Satmar Building Fund

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
11
La Fondation De L'ecole De Formation Hebraique

Raising funds for jewish education in the west island of montreal

—
12
La CommunautÉ De CongrÉGation Simchas Chaim

Olicit receive and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Institut Gueder Chel Torah and the most unlike its peers is Ort Canada. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/41
Grantees still filing
26/41
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE SPANISH & PORTUGUESE SYNAGOGUE — C$27,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetCHADBAD OF THE TOWN — C$20,228 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMIGDAL OHR — C$13,600 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCENTRE CHABAD — C$12,160 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetADDICTION OUTREACH — C$10,000 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCSUQ — C$6,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCONGREGATION MAGHEN DAVID — C$5,360 over 2y, 9.5% of budgetCONGREGATION OR HAHAYYIM — C$3,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetINSTITUTE YAVNE — C$2,600 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCAISSE BETH YOSSEF — C$2,586 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCONGRAGATION BELZ — C$2,160 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetÉCOLE MAIMONIDE — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MONTREAL — C$1,936 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTORAH FAX — C$1,520 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCongregation Sédé Itshaq — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCEDARS CANCER FOUNDATION — C$1,410 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMADA COMMUNITY CENTER — C$1,350 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONG. MAGHEN DAVID ADOM — C$1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMIRIAM FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$802 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetORT MONTREAL — C$720 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVMM — C$666 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION MÈRES DU MONDE EN SANTÉ — C$600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFONDATION CHARLES BRUNEAU — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUT GUEDER CHEL TORAH — C$500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCancer Research Society — C$450 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Hopital Pierre-Boucher — C$410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCongregation Beth Rambam — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA FOUNDATION DES ECOLES JPPS-BLALIK — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHABAD WESTMINSTER — C$360 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL — C$360 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetW I A I H — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE BNOIS YISROEL — C$260 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRabbinical College of Canada — C$252 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSHAARE ZION CONGREGATION — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBeth Rivkah academy — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD LIFELINE — C$200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEN WELDER EDUCATION CENTER — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DOVI WORENKLEIN MENTOR PROGRAM — C$126 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetOr Menachem — C$126 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCHARITY TZEDAKAH MONTREAL — C$26 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Federation CjaQC25.2× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Federation Cja · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · Fondation Miryam Berdugo Cohen · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · L'Organisation de la jeunesse Chabad Loubavitch/Chabad Loubavitch Youth Organization · Norbert & Gusta Roth Foundation/Fondation Norbert & Gusta Roth · Residence Sepharade Salomon (Communaute Sepharade Unifiee Du Quebec) · Chabad Chai Center / Centre Chabad Chai · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 43 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 822027553:2024-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on La Fondation Familiale Albert & Jimmy Lévy the Albert & Jimmy Lévy Family’s filings →