Skip to content
Canadian charities

Montreal, QC · Private foundation

Norbert & Gusta Roth Foundation/Fondation Norbert & Gusta Roth

To receive and maintain funds and to apply from time to time all or part thereof and the income derived therefrom to ':qualified donees' in accordance with the income tax act of canada.

C$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$636
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$664k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
B'NAIL BRITH CANADAC$2,250
CANADIAN HADASSH-WIZOC$2,000
STRANGERS IN THE NIGHT FOUNDATIONC$1,500
ISRAEL CANCER RESEARCHC$1,250
MIRIAM FOUNDATION/FOUNDATION MIRIAMC$1,250
SEGAL CENTRE FOR PERFORMING ARTSC$1,000
COTE-SAIN-LUC (DRAMATIC SOCIETY)C$1,000
BETH TIKVAHC$800
CHAI LIFELINE CANADAC$750
BETH ORA CONGREGATIONC$636
TECHNION CANADAC$500
JEWISH RUSSIAN CHARITY FUND (CHAMAH)C$500
CONGREGATION BETH RIKVAHC$500
CANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOMC$500
JEWISH HOSPITAL OF HOPE ELDERCARE FOUNDATIONC$360
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 63% of grant dollars (C$91k). The 37% that went abroad (C$53k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 37% of all-years giving (C$53k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

61%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$88k · 41 repeat orgsC$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

41 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

41
45

Total granted

C$88k
C$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+18%

Still filing today

66%
31%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BB
    B'NAIL BRITH CANADA
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$9k · revenue +147%
  • CH
    CANADIAN HADASSAH-WIZO
    4× · 2021–2024 · C$8k · revenue +19%
  • MH
    Miamonides Hospital
    3× · 2018–2022 · C$6k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • L
    LIST
    one grant, 2017 · C$20k
  • I
    IST
    one grant, 2020 · C$7k
  • MH
    MIAMONIDES HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshiva Gedolah L'ecole D'etudes Superieures De Montreal

The charity opertes a school for jewish children

—
2
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
3
CongrÉGation Belz

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
4
La Fondation De L'ecole De Formation Hebraique

Raising funds for jewish education in the west island of montreal

—
5
BNai BRith Hillel Foundation of Montreal Inc./La Fondation B'Nai B'Rith Hillel de Montréal Inc.

B'nai brith hillel foundation of montreal inc.s' mission is to support jewish students on campus.

—
6
L'École Beth Tziporah

The charity operates an elementary and high school for jewish girls

—
7
Communauté Chabad de Mont-Tremblant

To operate a synagague and promote jewish religieus and moral and ethical values and practices

—
8
Le Centre D'ÉTude Torah De MontrÉAl Inc.

The Torah Study Centre of Montreal Inc provides religious education and services

—
9
Treitel Foundation / Fondation Treitel

Supporting institutions that provides religious jewish education. the organization provides funds to ensure that poor families are able to provide their children with a quality education. providing funds to synagogues so that jewish…

—
10
Communauté Chabad du Vieux-Montréal

Office religieux activites de promotion de la culture religieuse juive.

—
11
Fondation de Recherche Medicale Maimonides / Maimonides Medical Research Foundation

The purpose of the maimonides medical research foundation is to solicit and obtain gifts legacies and endowment funds in order to promote research health education and cultural services and to make gifts grants contributions and donations…

—
12
Congrégation Imray Chaim D'Chasidai Wiznitz/Mosdoth Wiznitz du Canada

To promote the teaching and practice of the jewish religion in its traditional form

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre Chabad De Ville Mont Royal Chabad Centre of the Town of Mount Royal and the most unlike its peers is The Sitn Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 87 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
29/42
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetB'NAIL BRITH CANADA — C$8,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN HADASSAH-WIZO — C$8,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMiamonides Hospital — C$6,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetICRF — C$4,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBeth Tikvah — C$3,494 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCJA — C$3,430 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCROHNS AND COLITIS CANADA — C$3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTRANGERS IN THE NIGHT FOUNDATION — C$2,600 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetORT CANADA — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCHABAD ON THE TOWN — C$2,210 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEGAL CENTRE FOR PERFORMING ARTS — C$2,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCHABAD ZICHRON KEDOSHIM — C$2,100 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH RUSSIAN CHARITY FUND (CHAMAH) — C$2,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetBETH TIKVAH — C$1,690 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHAI LIFELINE CANADA — C$1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFREE HEBREW FOR JUNIORS — C$1,330 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetMIRIAM FOUNDATION/FOUNDATION MIRIAM — C$1,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETH ORA CONGREGATION — C$1,158 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH HOSPITAL OF HOPE ELDERCARE FOUNDATION — C$1,110 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGutnick Mazel Center — C$1,002 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetGENERATIONS FOUNDATION — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMont Sinai Hospital — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetChabad Lifeline — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON SHALOM — C$900 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN MAGEN DAVID ADOM — C$750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTECHNION CANADA — C$750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCUMMINGS JEWISH CENTRE FOR SENIORS — C$600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLA FONDATION DES ECOLES JPPS BIALIK — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED HATZALAH CANADA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEZER MIZION CANADA — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJewish Russian Ce... — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTREAL GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCummings Center f... — C$480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNAUTÉ CHABAD DE DOLLARD — C$480 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBeit Hacholem Can... — C$450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGE RABBINICAL DU CANADA — C$400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetShaare Zadek Cong... — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMADA COMMUNITY CENTRE INC — C$300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetB'Nai Brith Montreal... — C$250 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChai Chabad — C$180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTemple Emanuel — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds B'NAIL BRITH CANADA ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN HADASSAH-WIZO ↗
  • Who funds Miamonides Hospital ↗
  • Who funds ICRF ↗
  • Who funds Beth Tikvah ↗
  • Who funds CJA ↗
  • Who funds CROHNS AND COLITIS CANADA ↗
  • Who funds STRANGERS IN THE NIGHT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ORT CANADA ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD ON THE TOWN ↗
  • Who funds SEGAL CENTRE FOR PERFORMING ARTS ↗
  • Who funds CHABAD ZICHRON KEDOSHIM ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH RUSSIAN CHARITY FUND (CHAMAH) ↗
  • Who funds BETH TIKVAH ↗
  • Who funds CHAI LIFELINE CANADA ↗
  • Who funds FREE HEBREW FOR JUNIORS ↗
  • Who funds MIRIAM FOUNDATION/FOUNDATION MIRIAM ↗
  • Who funds BETH ORA CONGREGATION ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH HOSPITAL OF HOPE ELDERCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Gutnick Mazel Center ↗
  • Who funds GENERATIONS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mont Sinai Hospital ↗
  • Who funds Chabad Lifeline ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Federation CjaFondation Familiale G…Jewish Community Foun…Rayjo Charitable TrustMorris and Rosalind G…The Mireille and Murr…The Azrieli Foundatio…Nellie Philanthropy F…Maxwell Cummings Fami…Fondation Eldee-Eldee…Alvin Segal Family Fo…Mitzi & Mel Dobrin Fa…
Federation CjaQC26.1× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Federation Cja · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Morris and Rosalind Goodman Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Morris Et Rosalind Goodman · The Mireille and Murray Steinberg Family Foundation/La Fondation de la Famille Mireille et Muuray Steinberg · The Azrieli Foundation/La Fondation Azrieli · Nellie Philanthropy Foundation · Maxwell Cummings Family Foundation - Fondation de la Famille Maxwell Cummings · Fondation Eldee-Eldee Foundation · Alvin Segal Family Foundation · Mitzi & Mel Dobrin Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 87 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 890628142:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Norbert & Gusta Roth Foundation/Fondation Norbert & Gusta Roth’s filings →