Montreal, QC · Private foundation
Kracauer Family Foundation/Fondation Familiale Kracauer
The foundation raises and manages funds for the purpose of making gifts to other registered charities or organizations that are qualified donees.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2023
- Under C$10k6 grants · C$10k
- C$50k–250k2 grants · C$160k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$2.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CONGREGATION SHAAR HASHOMAYIM | C$2,000,000 |
| FEDERATION CJA | C$100,000 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND OF CANADA INC | C$60,000 |
| CANADIAN CENTRE FOR ARCHLTECTURE | C$5,000 |
| RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA | C$1,000 |
| SOCIETE ALZHEIMER RIVE-SUD | C$1,000 |
| BENJAMIN AND VANDA TREISER MAISON SHALOM INC | C$1,000 |
| RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA | C$1,000 |
| FONDATION RESSOURCES POUR LES ENFANTS DIABETIQUES | C$500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.
Your giving at home — 4% of grant dollars (C$84k). The 96% that went abroad (C$2.3M) is mapped below.
Beyond home — 96% of all-years giving (C$2.3M)
0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.
International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +37% for the ones you funded once.
26 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2023, 22 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$166k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- EIEZRAL ISRAEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2019 · C$15k · revenue +45% · 42% of their budget
- CFCanadian Friends of United Wiznitz/IGUD Wiznitz3× · 2017–2019 · C$13k · revenue +149%
- RCRabbinical College of Canada3× · 2017–2019 · C$6k · revenue +58%
Funded once
- PSPER SCHEDULE ATTACHED (NO SCHEDULE ATTACHED)one grant, 2021 · C$30k
- FCFriendship Circle of Quebecone grant, 2017 · C$5k · revenue +11%
- CFCanadian Friends of United Wiznitz Institution in Israelone grant, 2017 · C$5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The charity opertes a school for jewish children
Raising funds for jewish education in the west island of montreal
The charity operates an elementary and high school for jewish girls
Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture
B'nai brith hillel foundation of montreal inc.s' mission is to support jewish students on campus.
Providing funds for medical charitable and educational purposes by making gifts grants contributions and donations to or for the benefit of the mont sinai hospital centre montreal
Receive and accumulate funds to offer a better quality of life to the residents of the jewish eldercare centre
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.
The foundation raises funds to provide financial support of educational activities
Supporting institutions that provides religious jewish education. the organization provides funds to ensure that poor families are able to provide their children with a quality education. providing funds to synagogues so that jewish…
Bjec offers services to schools including professional development to teachers principals consultants in special education and early academic intervention. bjec is the central agency for jewish education in montreal and is responsible for…
Providing religious programming including seminars and lectures. maintining a synagogue for daily religious services provide subsidized kosher meals for students. sponsoring social events that promote humanity. sponsoring social events…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is La fondation de l'hôpital de montréal pour enfants/the Montréal Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Canadian Centre for Architecture / Centre Canadien D'architecture. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EZRAL ISRAEL CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Canadian Friends of United Wiznitz/IGUD Wiznitz ↗
- Who funds Rabbinical College of Canada ↗
- Who funds Friendship Circle of Quebec ↗
- Who funds United Talmud Torah Herzliah ↗
- Who funds Benjamin and Canda Treiser ↗
- Who funds Congregation Shaar Hashomayim ↗
- Who funds Jewish General Hospital ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN CENTRE FOR ARCHITECTURE ↗
- Who funds Academie Beth Rickah ↗
- Who funds Canadian Cancer Society - Daffodil Ball ↗
- Who funds Chabad Chai Centre ↗
- Who funds Free Hebrew for Juniors ↗
- Who funds Sun Youth Organization ↗
- Who funds Cummings Jewish Centre ↗
- Who funds Centre Culturel Canadiens - Japonais ↗
- Who funds FONDATION DU CSSS LUCILLE-TEASDALE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · Federation Cja · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Dalfen Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Dalfen · Rose and Daniel Freedman Foundation Fondation Rose et DanielFreedman · Fondation Eldee-Eldee Foundation · Norbert & Gusta Roth Foundation/Fondation Norbert & Gusta Roth · Zolfam Matan Bceter Foundation · ORT Canada
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.