Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

I.R.C.D.- The Institute Research Communication and Development I.R.C.D.- L'Institut pour la Recherche la Communication et le Développement

The following activities were organized throughout the year: 1) spiritual retreats preached by a roman catholic priest.

C$154k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$111k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$43k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$111k
C$29,312
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$20M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COPPER RIDGE CONFERENCE CENTER (CRCC)C$110,655
COPPER RIDGE CONFERENCE CENTRE (CRSS)C$29,312
WESTBROOK EDUCATION FUNDC$13,568
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.5M · 8 repeat orgsC$734k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +43% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

8 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
8

Total granted

C$1.5M
C$734k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+10%

Still filing today

100%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    The True North Centre
    2× · 2019–2022 · C$549k · revenue +10%
  • CR
    COPPER RIDGE CONFERENCE CENER
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$457k · revenue +69% · 42% of their budget
  • L
    LINCCO
    3× · 2020–2022 · C$70k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • TC
    The Canadian Foundation for Cooperation and Development.....
    one grant, 2019 · C$500k · revenue +10% · 82% of their budget
  • CD
    Centre De Formation Le Manoir de Beaujeugraduated
    one grant, 2017 · C$152k · revenue +360% · 29% of their budget
  • F
    FCE
    one grant, 2020 · C$27k · revenue -23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
I.R.C.D.- the Institute Research Communication and Development I.R.C.D.- L'Institut pour la Recherche la Communication et le Développement

The following activities were organized throughout the year: 1) spiritual retreats preached by a roman catholic priest. they are meant to help the participants live their faith in their daily lives and to give them practical ideas in how…

—
2
Centre universitaire Fonteneige

It operated fonteneige univeristy centre which organized activities of spiritual cultural and professional formation for university students.

—
3
Wellspring Cultural Foundation

During the period covered by the return Wellspring operated a centre in which it imparted activities of spiritual and doctrinal formation such as retreats evenings of recollection classes on Church teaching personal spiritual guidance etc.…

—
4
Pretres Du 21E Siecle Priests for the 21ST Century

Comme à chaque année nous avons en 2024 organisé un souper-bénéfice avec conférence pour lever des fonds. les fonds collectés sont utilisés pour verser des bourses d'étude à l'université pontificale de la sainte-croix à rome qui les…

—
5
Le Cercle du savoir

Le Cercle a commencé ses activités en janvier 2019. Les activités éducatives correspondant à sa mission consistent en des conférences sur des sujets d'intérêt général ainsi que des cours à caractère philosophique et culturel. Au cours de…

—
6
The En Route Foundation/La Fondation En Route

The Foundation held activities of religious and spiritual formation such as symposiums spiritual exercises and retreats.

—
7
The Newman Institute of Catholic Studies

In 2024 through its members the institute aided in the operation of the minor in catholic studies and the chair of catholic studies at mcgill university. it also collaborated with the newman association in holding a number of lectures and…

—
8
Cim Foundation / Fondation Cim

Supporting distinguished lecturer programs scholarships and educational

—
9
Fondation du 21ième siècle de la Communauté Catholique
—
10
Society for Catholic Life and Culture

Education - leadership programmes support for catholic writers support for catholic education conference

—
11
Organisation Catholique Canadienne pour le Développement et la Paix

The organization aims to promote international solidarity and integral human development through an education program in canada and socio-economic development projects carried out in several countries in latin americ africa asia and the…

—
12
West Plains Foundation

West plains foundation operates westwood centre through which courses and seminars were offered to highschool and university students promoting academic and personal excellence. educational programs were provided to women to advance in…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverview Study Centre and the most unlike its peers is Lincco-L'institut Pour La Culture Et La Cooperation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
8/14
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe True North Centre — C$549,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetThe Canadian Foundation for Cooperation and Development..... — C$500,000 over 1y, 82% of budgetCOPPER RIDGE CONFERENCE CENER (CRCC) — C$456,658 over 5y, 42% of budgetRiverview Study Centre — C$230,500 over 3y, 44% of budgetCentre De Formation Le Manoir de Beaujeu — C$151,894 over 1y, 29% of budgetLes Amis de Piedmont — C$81,860 over 3y, 74% of budgetLINCCO — C$69,591 over 3y, 12% of budgetWestbrook Education Fund — C$47,978 over 4y, 6.2% of budgetCEDARCREST FOUNDATION — C$37,413 over 3y, 22% of budgetFCE — C$26,664 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetSanta Croce Foundation — C$25,000 over 1y, 19% of budgetTour des Pins Institute — C$11,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetHEADFORD CULTURAL GROUP — C$10,135 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR THE SOCIO-CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT OF WOMEN — C$2,224 over 2y, 0.4% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

F C E Foundation for …The True North Centre…Northmount Foundation…The Canadian Foundati…Zlc FoundationThe Tour des Pins Ins…PayPal Giving Fund Ca…Canadahelps CanadonCanadian Online Givin…
F C E Foundation for Culture & EducationQC14.6× affinity10 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: F C E Foundation for Culture & Education · The True North Centre for Education and Human Development · Northmount Foundation Inc. · The Canadian Foundation for Cooperation and Development · Zlc Foundation · The Tour des Pins Institute / L'Institut Tour des Pins · PayPal Giving Fund Canada · Canadahelps Canadon · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-01-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 140903139:2024-01-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on I.R.C.D.- The Institute Research Communication and Development I.R.C.D.- L'Institut pour la Recherche la Communication et le Développement’s filings →