Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

The Tour des Pins Institute / L'Institut Tour des Pins

Tdpi operates two centres of foundation one at 1380 pine ave w and the other 1 242 redpath crescent montreal.

C$35k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$35k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$35,110
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$367k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LE CENTRE DE FORMATION LE MANOIR DE BEAUJEUC$35,110
02Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The En Route Foundation/La Fondation En Route

The Foundation held activities of religious and spiritual formation such as symposiums spiritual exercises and retreats.

—
2
Centre universitaire Fonteneige

It operated fonteneige univeristy centre which organized activities of spiritual cultural and professional formation for university students.

—
3
Wellspring Cultural Foundation

During the period covered by the return Wellspring operated a centre in which it imparted activities of spiritual and doctrinal formation such as retreats evenings of recollection classes on Church teaching personal spiritual guidance etc.…

—
4
The Centre for Teresian Carmelite Education and Spirituality

Spiritual direction/counselling spiritual talks days of reflection retreats bible studies missions in parishes.

—
5
Tifereth Charitable Foundation

Provided scholarships for students with the proven ability to conduct advanced studies in theological research.

—
6
Institut De Pastorale De L'archidiocÈSe De Rimouski

Formation et perfectionnement en théologie et en pastorale - cours universitaires sessions de formation conférences etc.

—
7
Providence Centre / Providence Renewal Centre Corporation

Facilities for the advancement of education in the form of retreats religious and other workshops.

—
8
Centre d'éducation religieuse/Centre for religious education
—
9
Gregoriana Inc.

Seminaries and other religious colleges

—
10
Society for Catholic Life and Culture

Education - leadership programmes support for catholic writers support for catholic education conference

—
11
The Faith Explained Institute

Talks classes seminars on formation in the Catholic Faith

—
12
MonastÈRe Du Coeur De JÉSus

Les programmes offerts au cours de l'exercice visent l'avancement de la religion la promotion des enseignements spirituels de la religion catholique et le respect des doctrineset des observances spirituelles dans lesquelles s'appiquent ces…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre De Formation Le Manoir De Beaujeu and the most unlike its peers is Prom-Edu-Val Society. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTrue North Centre for Education and Human Development — C$651,379 over 1y, 48% of budgetLe Centre de Formation Le Manoir de Beaujeu — C$136,920 over 6y, 5.6% of budgetCEDARCREST FOUNDATION — C$13,500 over 2y, 9.8% of budgetI.R.C.D. Institute for Research, Communication and Developme — C$10,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFoundation pour la Culture et L'Education — C$2,400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEV — C$1,400 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAPAT — C$1,100 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetErnescliff Foundation — C$750 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

F C E Foundation for …I.R.C.D.- The Institu…Northmount Foundation…Canadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
F C E Foundation for Culture & EducationQC10.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: F C E Foundation for Culture & Education · I.R.C.D.- The Institute Research Communication and Development I.R.C.D.- L'Institut pour la Recherche la Communication et le Développement · Northmount Foundation Inc. · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of religion.

Source object 849179874:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Tour des Pins Institute / L'Institut Tour des Pins’ filings →