Skip to content
Canadian charitiesMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Montreal, QC · Public foundation

The True North Centre for Education and Human Development

The charity gives grants to other registered charities in canada.

C$137k
Granted FY2024still arriving
3
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$112k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k1 grant · C$5k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$20k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$112k
C$20,000
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FONDATION HARATANC$112,158
RIVIERVIEW STUDY CENTREC$20,000
LES AMIS DE PEIDMONTC$5,000
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$3.2M · 9 repeat orgsC$242k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
2

Total granted

C$3.2M
C$242k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-39%
+1%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • WP
    WEST PLAINS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2017–2023 · C$1.1M · revenue -53% · 66% of their budget
  • FH
    FONDATION HARATAN
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$564k · revenue +132% · 53% of their budget
  • I
    I.R.C.D.
    2× · 2018–2019 · C$525k · revenue -31%

Funded once

  • C
    C.F.C.D.
    one grant, 2018 · C$142k · revenue -62%
  • F
    F.C.E
    one grant, 2018 · C$100k · revenue +1%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pretres Du 21E Siecle Priests for the 21ST Century

Comme à chaque année nous avons en 2024 organisé un souper-bénéfice avec conférence pour lever des fonds. les fonds collectés sont utilisés pour verser des bourses d'étude à l'université pontificale de la sainte-croix à rome qui les…

—
2
Cim Foundation / Fondation Cim

Supporting distinguished lecturer programs scholarships and educational

—
3
Fondation De La Cite Etudiante Roberval
—
4
Centre universitaire Fonteneige

It operated fonteneige univeristy centre which organized activities of spiritual cultural and professional formation for university students.

—
5
Le Cercle du savoir

Le Cercle a commencé ses activités en janvier 2019. Les activités éducatives correspondant à sa mission consistent en des conférences sur des sujets d'intérêt général ainsi que des cours à caractère philosophique et culturel. Au cours de…

—
6
Fondation Université du Québec

Octroi de bourses et financement de projets de recherche ou de développement pour les institutions universitaires.

—
7
The En Route Foundation/La Fondation En Route

The Foundation held activities of religious and spiritual formation such as symposiums spiritual exercises and retreats.

—
8
Fondation du 21ième siècle de la Communauté Catholique
—
9
Fondation Hec Montréal

Financement de plusieurs projets de recherche reliés à la gestion de hec montréal et contributions à des programmes de bourses à hec montréal

—
10
Fondation Collège International Marie de France

La fondation a pour mission la promotion de l'éducation à travers le soutien et le financement de divers projets de développement principalement du collège international marie de france.

—
11
Fondation Canadienne De L'insead/Canadian Insead Foundation

Octroi de bourses d'études

—
12
Fondation du collége Regina Assumpta
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Riverview Study Centre and the most unlike its peers is Fondation Haratan. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

5
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/11
Grantees still filing
3/11
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWEST PLAINS FOUNDATION — C$1,108,791 over 2y, 66% of budgetFONDATION HARATAN — C$563,558 over 6y, 53% of budgetI.R.C.D. — C$525,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetAltum Foundation — C$500,069 over 2y, 92% of budgetRIVERVIEW STUDY CENTRE — C$226,027 over 4y, 59% of budgetC.F.C.D. — C$142,000 over 1y, 7.9% of budgetLES AMIS DE PIEDMONT — C$123,000 over 6y, 100% of budgetF.C.E — C$100,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetSANTA CROCE — C$61,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetTOUR DES PINS INSTITUTE — C$42,920 over 3y, 4.0% of budgetWESTBROOK EDUCATION FOUND — C$35,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

F C E Foundation for …I.R.C.D.- The Institu…The Canadian Foundati…Northmount Foundation…Headford Cultural Gro…Zlc FoundationCanadian Online Givin…Canadahelps Canadon
F C E Foundation for Culture & EducationQC13.5× affinity9 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: F C E Foundation for Culture & Education · I.R.C.D.- The Institute Research Communication and Development I.R.C.D.- L'Institut pour la Recherche la Communication et le Développement · The Canadian Foundation for Cooperation and Development · Northmount Foundation Inc. · Headford Cultural Group · Zlc Foundation · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a public foundation under support of religion.

Source object 869439000:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on True North Centre for Education and Human Development’s filings →