Skip to content

Maple, ON · Charitable organization

Friends of Mayanot Canada

To provide traditional jewish education to students from canada and other countries attending programs run by mayanot institute for jewish studies in jerusalem israel.

C$152k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$152k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$152,000
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$880k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipientC$152,000
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 65% of grant dollars (C$479k). The 35% that went abroad (C$259k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 35% of all-years giving (C$259k)

1 country, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore
ILC$152k · 1 grant

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

77%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$569k · 3 repeat orgsC$169k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +121% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

3 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

3
8

Total granted

C$569k
C$169k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+121%
+21%

Still filing today

67%
88%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · C$259k
  • CO
    CHABAD OF RICHMOND HILL
    2× · 2020–2021 · C$240k · revenue +121%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF MICHON LA'CHOLEH
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$70k · revenue +114%

Funded once

  • CO
    CHABAD OF VANCOUVER ISLANDgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · C$100k · revenue +65%
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH CHEDER
    one grant, 2019 · C$20k · revenue -92%
  • KH
    KUPAS HACHESED MEOROTH
    one grant, 2022 · C$20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
2
Chabad of Downtown Vancouver

Fostering and conducting religious jewish educating in bc

—
3
Reb Mayer Baal Hanes - Chibas Jerusalem

Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.

—
4
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
5
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
6
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
7
Bais Chaya Mushkah School for Girls

To establish an orthodox jewish school for girls devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith as well as general academic studies. to preach and advance the spiritual teachings of the orthodox jewish sect known…

—
8
Or Chadash

Scholarships were granted to qualified students wh desired to continue their education. our agent in isreal rabbi '...' must approve all scholarship applications to ensure that the students qualify for financial assisstance due to faily…

—
9
Chabad of Midtown

Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.

—
10
Chaverim of the Community

To promote the teachings of chabad lubavitch by establishing scholarships for persons seeking to attend schools or camps that promote those teachings. to offer support and assistance to the needy. to operate a camp for underprivileged…

—
11
Kollel Derech Chaim
—
12
Chabad Lubavitch On the East Side
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mesivta Lubavitch Toronto and the most unlike its peers is Kupas Hachesed Meoroth. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCHABAD OF RICHMOND HILL — C$240,000 over 2y, 7.7% of budgetCHABAD OF VANCOUVER ISLAND — C$100,000 over 1y, 9.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MICHON LA'CHOLEH — C$70,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH CHEDER — C$20,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY — C$8,785 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRabbinical College of Canada — C$7,200 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBAIS CHOMESH HIGH SCHOOL — C$7,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetMESIVTA LUBAVITCH TORONTO — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSHMUEL ZAHAVY CHEDER CHABAD SCHOOL — C$3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rayjo Charitable TrustON9.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rayjo Charitable Trust · My Charity Fund · Toronto Chesed Foundation · Chabad of Midtown · Bais Tefilloh Franklin · The Rappaport Family Charitable Foundation · Congregation Bais Menachem Chabad-Lubavitch · Jewish Russian Speaking Community of Toronto · Jewish Niagara · Maharam Tav Fund · Moral Arc Foundation · Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-01-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under support of schools and education.

Source object 856435904:2024-01-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Friends of Mayanot Canada’s filings →