Skip to content
Canadian charities

Thornhill, ON · Private foundation

The Rappaport Family Charitable Foundation

The charity does not carry on any activities through its employees or volunteers.

C$72k
Granted FY2024still arriving
5
Grants FY2024still arriving
—
Regions reached
C$24k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k2 grants · C$13k
  • C$10k–50k3 grants · C$59k
C$14,785
Median grant
—
Regions reached
C$386k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHARITY EX FOUNDATIONC$24,000
VMM ZICHRON CHAIMC$20,000
BAIS CHOMESH HIGH SCHOOLC$14,785
CHABAD LUBAVITCH OF ONTARIOC$9,700
JEM CANADAC$3,400
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$1.2M · 25 repeat orgsC$105k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +19% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.

25 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 22 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
17

Total granted

C$1.2M
C$82k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+19%
+14%

Still filing today

76%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • JH
    JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · C$178k · revenue +423%
  • ML
    MESIVTA LUBAVITCH TORONTO
    4× · 2017–2021 · C$113k · revenue +120%
  • OC
    OHR CHAYA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION
    2× · 2019–2020 · C$75k · revenue +174%

Funded once

  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE SHUL
    one grant, 2018 · C$31k · revenue -89% · 100% of their budget
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$13k
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH CHEDER
    one grant, 2018 · C$8k · revenue -76%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Zahavy Family Foundation

Support of jewish education and institutions

—
2
Reb Mayer Baal Hanes - Chibas Jerusalem

Providing scholarships to poor and low income students in israel.

—
3
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
4
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
5
The Chabad Rehovot Fund
—
6
Chesed L'avraham

The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel

—
7
Or Chadash

Scholarships were granted to qualified students wh desired to continue their education. our agent in isreal rabbi '...' must approve all scholarship applications to ensure that the students qualify for financial assisstance due to faily…

—
8
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
9
Chaverim of the Community

To promote the teachings of chabad lubavitch by establishing scholarships for persons seeking to attend schools or camps that promote those teachings. to offer support and assistance to the needy. to operate a camp for underprivileged…

—
10
Chabad of Midtown

Fosters the study of traditional judaism through programmes directed at adults and children.

—
11
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
12
Mishmeret

During the fiscal period, the organization accepted funds which were dispersed as scholarships to deserving students and to sholars doing research to be used in the study of judaism.

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Canadian Friends of the Shul of Bal Harbour and the most unlike its peers is Chabad of Yorkville Rosedale. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 44 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
32/36
Grantees still filing
20/36
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$177,575 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMESIVTA LUBAVITCH TORONTO — C$112,600 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetOHR CHAYA CHARITABLE FOUNDATION — C$75,465 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetCHARITY EX FOUNDATION — C$71,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetMifal Klita — C$65,000 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetChabad — C$52,875 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBAIS CHOMESH HIGH SCHOOL — C$47,085 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetMONTREAL TORAH CENTRE — C$37,220 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetBais Chaya Mushka Elementary School — C$36,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF THE SHUL — C$31,260 over 1y, 100% of budgetSHMUEL ZAHAVY CHEDER CHABAD — C$30,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetBETH OLOTH CHARITABLE ORGANIZATION — C$27,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCanadian Friends of Institute Oholei Torah — C$20,000 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetVMM ZICHRON CHAIM — C$20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF MESIVTA TIFE — C$19,490 over 4y, 33% of budgetJERUSALEM OUTREACH CENTRE — C$18,650 over 2y, 84% of budgetTzivos Hashem Canada Inc. — C$12,900 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetMEORTH — C$8,650 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF LUBAVITCH CHEDER — C$8,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetMachson Tzvi Hersh — C$6,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetAGUDAT CHASDEL CHABAD — C$5,300 over 4y, 1.5% of budgetYESHIVA SCHOLARSHIP FUND OF ISRAEL — C$4,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCHABAD OF NEWFOUNDLAND — C$3,600 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetJEM CANADA — C$3,400 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFRIENDS OF MAYANOT CANADA — C$2,800 over 2y, 5.2% of budgetCHABAD OF THE AVENUE — C$2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChabad — C$2,200 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetBNAI ZION CHARITY FUND — C$2,100 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUPTOWN CHABAD — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChai Centre — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCanadian Friends of Chabad of Tiberias Inc. — C$2,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHABAD OF NIAGARA — C$2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBeth Joseph Lubavitch — C$1,100 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMobile Mitzvah Center — C$1,000 over 1y, 100% of budgetCHAMAH — C$650 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetINSTITUTE FOR LIFELING LEARNING — C$360 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zichron Binyomin Char…Heitner Charitable Fo…Rayjo Charitable TrustJewish Russian Speaki…Chabad of MidtownMy Charity FundChabad Lubavitch of R…Mashiyev Family Found…CharityEx FoundationShainhouse Family Cha…Chabad at Flamingo IncThe F&R Hauer Charita…
Zichron Binyomin Charity FoundationON22.3× affinity19 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zichron Binyomin Charity Foundation · Heitner Charitable Foundation · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Russian Speaking Community of Toronto · Chabad of Midtown · My Charity Fund · Chabad Lubavitch of Richmond Hill · Mashiyev Family Foundation · CharityEx Foundation · Shainhouse Family Charitable Foundation · Chabad at Flamingo Inc · The F&R Hauer Charitable Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 44 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-11-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations.

Source object 119109270:2024-11-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Rappaport Family’s filings →