Cote Saint-Luc, QC · Charitable organization
École Études Talmudiques Beth Yosef Meir
We operate a school of post talmudic studies.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YAD EZER FUND | C$2,500 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +47% since the first grant, against +8% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$3k went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- ZCZICHRON CHAIM3× · 2020–2022 · C$21k · revenue +47%
- HIHATZALHA ISRAEL ARIZAL2× · 2018–2019 · C$6k · revenue +99%
- FMFIRST MESIVTA3× · 2019–2022 · C$3k · revenue +35%
Funded once
- CCTMone grant, 2021 · C$13k
- CBCAISSE BETH YOSSEFone grant, 2020 · C$3k · revenue +8%
- ITINSTITUT T.O.R.A.graduatedone grant, 2022 · C$3k · revenue +83%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.
École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
Support of jewish education and institutions
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…
The charity operates an elementary and high school for jewish girls
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is AcadÉMie YÉShiva YavnÉ and the most unlike its peers is The Yad Ezer Fund. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM ↗
- Who funds HATZALHA ISRAEL ARIZAL ↗
- Who funds CENTRE CHABAD ↗
- Who funds FIRST MESIVTA ↗
- Who funds CAISSE BETH YOSSEF ↗
- Who funds INSTITUT T.O.R.A. ↗
- Who funds YAD EZER FUND ↗
- Who funds CENTRE BETH HAMIDRASH ↗
- Who funds CHABAD SOUTH SHORE ↗
- Who funds BETH JACOB SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds YAVNEH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Institut CBM · Fondation Sépharade Kollel Avrechim / Sephardic Kollel Avrechim foundation · Fondation de la Famille Nataf/Nataf Family Foundation · The Shrage Zimmerman Memorial Fund · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Aaron and Susan Lieberman Foundation · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.