Montreal, QC · Charitable organization
Congregation College Rabbinique Du Quebec / Congregation Rabbinical College of Quebec
To establish a synagogue.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$8k
- C$250k+1 grant · C$846k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC TOMCHEI TIMIMIM | C$846,112 |
| BETH RIVKAH ACADEMY FOR GIRLS | C$6,500 |
| CONGREGATION ZEIRAI DATH W'DAATH | C$999 |
| CONG ZERA DAAT | C$1 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +33% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
8 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- RCRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC TOMCHEI TMIMIM7× · 2018–2024 · C$3.0M · revenue +174% · 89% of their budget
- CTCOLLEGE TAV4× · 2020–2023 · C$30k · revenue +77%
- BRBETH RIVKA2× · 2018–2024 · C$21k · revenue +33%
Funded once
- COCIRCLE OF LIFE CHARITABLE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2023 · C$248k · revenue -9%
- RCRABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADAgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$172k · revenue +70%
- OMOHR MENACHEMgraduatedone grant, 2018 · C$51k · revenue +311%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
The charity provides religious education for underpriveleged children in israel
The charity opertes a school for jewish children
Support of jewish education and institutions
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide a religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values of jewish faith.
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse
To operate a school for higher talmudic studies
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.
The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Centre chabad and the most unlike its peers is Weider Foundation/Fondation Weider. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC TOMCHEI TMIMIM ↗
- Who funds CENTRE CHABAD ↗
- Who funds CIRCLE OF LIFE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF CANADA ↗
- Who funds TZIVOS HASHEM ↗
- Who funds OHR MENACHEM ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE OHOLEI TORAH ↗
- Who funds COLLEGE TAV ↗
- Who funds BETH RIVKA ↗
- Who funds HATZOLO ↗
- Who funds CONG ZERA DAAT ↗
- Who funds GAN ISRAEL ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
- Who funds CENTRE SEPHARADE LAVAL ↗
- Who funds TOWER OF LIGHT ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY FDTN ↗
- Who funds EITZ CHAIM ↗
- Who funds BAIS TEFILLAH FRANKLIN ↗
- Who funds CHASDEY LEVY ↗
- Who funds WIEDER EDUCATIONAL FDTN ↗
- Who funds ECOLE PREMIER MESIFTA ↗
- Who funds EZRAS ACHIM ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rayjo Charitable Trust · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · My Charity Fund · Maharam Tav Fund · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Fondation Familiale Gewurz/Gewurz Family Fondation · Gad and Sandra Bitton Family Foundation · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Federation Cja
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.