Mont-Royal, QC · Charitable organization
Congrégation Reshith Chochma Première Mesifta du Canada / Congregation Reshith Chochma First Mesifta of Canada
The charity operates a synagogue in montreal.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k3 grants · C$10k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$34k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| YAD EZER RUND | C$17,500 |
| ZICHON CHAIM CHARITY | C$16,642 |
| BETH JACOB | C$7,250 |
| KOLEL KESER TORAH | C$2,100 |
| YESHIVA GEDOLAH SCHOOL OF HIGHER LEARNING | C$700 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- YEYAD EZER FUND4× · 2021–2024 · C$153k · revenue +91%
- ZCZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY4× · 2021–2024 · C$59k · revenue +24%
- CTCHARITY TZEDOKO MONREal2× · 2021–2022 · C$51k · revenue +40%
Funded once
- TSTOMCHEI SHABBOSone grant, 2021 · C$25k · revenue -71%
- BBELZgraduatedone grant, 2021 · C$13k · revenue +32%
- MVMENUCHA V'SIMCHAgraduatedone grant, 2023 · C$9k · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva
Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning
To operate a school for higher talmudic studies
To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…
Support of jewish education and institutions
Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.
The organization has been set up to provide religious education.
École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse
To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.
To establish jewish courses for men of all ages. to print religious literature. to establish a library of jewish religious books. enhancement of the jewish religion.
To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is CongrÉGation Belz and the most unlike its peers is ÉCole Beth Jacob De Rav Hirschprung / Beth Jacob De Rav Hirschprung School. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YAD EZER FUND ↗
- Who funds BETH JACOB ↗
- Who funds ZICHRON CHAIM CHARITY ↗
- Who funds CHARITY TZEDOKO MONREal ↗
- Who funds TOMCHEI SHABBOS ↗
- Who funds BELZ ↗
- Who funds KOLEL KESER TORAH ↗
- Who funds MENUCHA V'SIMCHA ↗
- Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE YOEL MOSHE ↗
- Who funds RABBINICAL COLLEGE OF QUEBEC ↗
- Who funds YESHIVA GEDOLAH SCHOOL OF HIGHER LEARNING ↗
- Who funds CHEVRA KADISHA BNAI JACOB ↗
- Who funds HATZOLAS YISRAEL D'ARIZAL ↗
- Who funds CONG SHEVES ACHIM ↗
- Who funds TIFERETH BETH DAVID JERUSALEM ↗
- Who funds AVREICHIM TORAH INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds CONGREGATION YETEV LEV ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · The Micha Life Foundation la Fondation de Vie Micha · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Mifalei Chaim Bechesed (McB) · Fondation Famille Neuhaus Neuhaus Family Foundation · The Friedman Family Foundation/La Fondation Familiale Friedman · VMM Zichron Chaim Charity · Rosenberg Family Foundation / Fondation de la Famille Rosenberg · Maharam Tav Fund · D E Foundation / la Fondation D E · Fondation de la Famille Fischman Fischman Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.