Skip to content

Montreal, QC · Charitable organization

Community Holy Association Of United Jewish Congregations/ Communauté 'Sainte association' des congrégations juives unifiées

To provide funeral services to the jewish community and to operate a home for the elderly

C$240k
Granted FY2024still arriving
8
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$140k
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k5 grants · C$7k
  • C$10k–50k1 grant · C$18k
  • C$50k–250k2 grants · C$215k
C$2,650
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$3.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MENUCHA VESIMCHAC$140,000
MISHKAN SHAYEC$75,000
CANADIAN FRIENDS OF BELZC$18,232
CHEVRA KADISHAC$2,650
CENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE CHABADC$2,400
CONGREGATION BELZC$900
CHABAD OF ST. LAZAREC$500
CHABAD OF SHERBROOKEC$180
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

18%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$51k · 4 repeat orgsC$233k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +85% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 1 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
4

Total granted

C$51k
C$233k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+85%
0%

Still filing today

100%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 3% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$233k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    Congregation Belz
    5× · 2017–2024 · C$36k · revenue +83%
  • BJ
    Bnot Jerusalem
    2× · 2018–2020 · C$6k · revenue +158%
  • CK
    CHEVRA KADISHA
    2× · 2021–2024 · C$5k · revenue +85%

Funded once

  • MV
    MENUCHA VESIMCHA
    one grant, 2024 · C$140k · revenue 0%
  • MS
    MISHKAN SHAYE
    one grant, 2024 · C$75k
  • CF
    CANADIAN FRIENDS OF BELZ
    one grant, 2024 · C$18k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
2
Kolel of Congregation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz / Kolel de congrégation Chaside Belz Umachzike Hadasz

Provide scholarships to students operates torah study learning

—
3
ÉCole Mesifta Yoel Moshe

To carry on a school for religious studies and to pursue the advancement of religion and rituals of jewish interest.

—
4
Congrégation Charidem

Solicit receive and maintain funds to provide religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the jewish faith.

—
5
Kollel Menachem

To advance and teach the religious tenets doctrines and observances associated with the jewish faith. to advance education by providing scholarships for talmudic scholars; and to undertake activities ancillary and incidental to the…

—
6
École Maimonide

École dont la vocation est la promotion de l'éducation religieuse

—
7
Institut Kollel Noam Eliezer

Solicit recieve and maintain funds to provide charitable community programs and religious education for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethical and moral values and traditions of the…

—
8
Association Chabad sur le Campus

Promotion of jewish culture and religion engage jewish students learning of culture

—
9
Belz Community Center

Solicit receive and maintain funds for the purpose of advancing jewish culture and of instilling a reverence for the spiritual ethlical and moral values of jewish faith.

—
10
La Fondation Humanitaire Breslov

To provide funds for the religious and spiritual activities of the Breslov community.

—
11
Ziv Tzedakah Foundation

Solicitation of donations

—
12
Congregation Zichron Yakov Yitzchok Belz
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Chabad de Sherbrooke et des Cantons de l'Est Chabad of Sherbrooke and the Eastern Townships and the most unlike its peers is Menucha Vesimcha. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMENUCHA VESIMCHA — C$140,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetMISHKAN SHAYE — C$75,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCongregation Belz — C$36,400 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetCANADIAN FRIENDS OF BELZ — C$18,232 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetBnot Jerusalem — C$6,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHEVRA KADISHA — C$4,900 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCENTRE COMMUNAUTAIRE CHABAD — C$4,150 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetCHABAD OF SHERBROOKE — C$180 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hatzolas Yisroel D'ArizalQC9.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hatzolas Yisroel D'Arizal · Jewish Community Foundation of Montreal / La Fondation Communautaire Juive de Montréal · Kehilas Belz / Regroupement communautaire Belz · Centre chabad · Menucha Vesimcha · Zichron David and Pesie Grunberger Fund · Charité Tzedakah Montréal Charity Tzedakah Montreal · Maharam Tav Fund · Rayjo Charitable Trust · Canadahelps Canadon

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 8 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under judaism.

Source object 125304568:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Community Holy Association Of United Jewish Congregations/ Communauté 'Sainte association' des congrégations juives unifiées’ filings →