Skip to content

Sainte-Madeleine, QC · Charitable organization

Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Ste-Madeleine No. 4301

Programme d'aide a la communauté aides au autres organisme.

C$1k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$700
Largest
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$360
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$197k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE DE STE-MADELEINEC$700
CAMP RICHELIEUC$360
SCLÉROSE EN PLAQUE ST-HYACINTHEC$300
FONDATION CANCER DU SEIN DU QUÉBECC$100
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$35k · 16 repeat orgsC$11k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
12

Total granted

C$35k
C$11k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
+27%

Still filing today

94%
92%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • FD
    Fabrique de la Paroisse de Ste-Madeleine
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$10k · revenue +16%
  • SE
    SCLÉROSE EN PLAQUE ST-HYACINTHE
    7× · 2017–2024 · C$5k · revenue +139%
  • FC
    Fondation Cancer du Sein
    2× · 2018–2024 · C$4k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • FC
    FONDATION CANCER DU SEIN
    one grant, 2017 · C$4k
  • SC
    Société Canadienne du Cancer
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k · revenue -4%
  • FL
    FONDATION LES PETITS TRÉSORS
    one grant, 2019 · C$2k · revenue -70%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
4
Institut national de psychiatrie légale Philippe-Pinel
—
5
Centre France Mailhiot

D'assurer le bien-être des personnes atteintes de cancer et leurs proches

—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Viateur
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Victoire
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Tres-Saint-Redempteur
—
9
Survivre

Recherche sur les indices de souffrance numérique publication de texte de sensibilisation sur les problèmes de santé mentale

—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Angelique
—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Paroisse de la Cathédrale de Saint-Hyacinthe and the most unlike its peers is Club De Basket-Ball En Chaises Roulantes Les Kamikazes. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/27
Grantees still filing
18/27
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$10kC$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetFabrique de la Paroisse de Ste-Madeleine — C$9,955 over 8y, 2.1% of budgetSCLÉROSE EN PLAQUE ST-HYACINTHE — C$4,500 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetLAMP RICHELIEU — C$4,160 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetFondation Cancer du Sein — C$3,626 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDiabète Québec — C$2,800 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAISON VICTOR-GADBOIS — C$2,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSociété Canadienne du Cancer — C$2,300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION LES PETITS TRÉSORS — C$2,200 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMAISON DES JEUNES LE CHALET — C$1,908 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetFABRIQUE ST-JEAN-BAPTISTE — C$1,700 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetEPH RICHELIEU VAL MASKA — C$1,100 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetLa Rencontre-Biscum — C$725 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetOPÉRATION ENFANT SOLEIL — C$700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAPEH Richelieu Val Maska — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCLUB DE BASKET-BALL EN CHAISE ROULANTE DES KAMIKAZE — C$500 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetFondation Mira — C$450 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION DES CHEVALIER BENEVOLE DE L'HOTEL-DIEU DE ST-HYA — C$400 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetScout District St-Hyacinthe — C$400 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetCentre d'Intervention-Jeunesse des Maskoutains — C$300 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPAROISSE ST-HYACINTHE — C$200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLes Scout de la Montérégie — C$200 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLe Phare St-Hyacinthe et Région — C$150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Maladie du Coeur — C$150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAROISE ST-HILAIRE — C$150 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Diocese St.Hyacinthe — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLA FONDATION DIOCESE DE ST-HYACINTHE — C$100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetASSOCIATION PULMONAIRES QUÉBEC — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oeuvres de mère Émilie-JauronQC14.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oeuvres de mère Émilie-Jauron · Comité des oeuvres charitables du conseil beloeil 2905 · Soeurs de la Presentation de Marie Du Quebec · Comité des Oeuvres Charitables du Conseil Ste-Rosalie 9803 · CN Employees' and Pensioners' Community Fund · Les Oeuvres des Religieuses Adoratrices du Précieux Sang · Fondation Famille Benoit · Sjsh - District Du Canada · The Tenaquip Foundation / la Fondation Tenaquip · Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · La Fondation du Grand Montréal - The Foundation of Greater Montreal · Centraide Du Grand Montréal

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under organizations relieving poverty.

Source object 873850119:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Ste-Madeleine No. 4301’s filings →