Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Beloeil, QC · Charitable organization

Comité des oeuvres charitables du conseil beloeil 2905

Comptoir alimentaire dons aux églises dons de manteaux et bottes d'hiver aux écoles primaires de la région pour les enfants de familles démunies opération d'une clinique d'impôts et opération nez rouge en région.

C$71k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$21k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k17 grants · C$35k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$36k
C$1,322
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$155k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DE LA VALLÉE-DU-RICHELIEUC$21,085
ASSOCIATION DES CHEVALIERS BÉNÉVOLES DE L'HÔTEL-DIEUC$15,000
21EGROUPE SCOUT BELOEILC$6,269
PARENT SCOURS DON DE DÉPARTC$5,000
SEMER LE PRÉSENTC$4,900
AVRDI(ASS.VALLÉE RICHELIEUDÉFICIENCE INTELLECTUELLEC$4,030
FONDATION L'INTERMÈDEC$3,508
DON HUMANITAIRE ÉMILIE CRÊTEC$3,000
FONDATION CHARLES-BRUNEAUC$1,351
18EGROUPE SCOUT BELOEILC$1,322
LA MAISON DES JEUNES DE SAINT-BRUNOC$1,112
PAROISSE TRINITÉ-SUR-RICHELIEUC$1,000
FONDATION SOURCE BLEUEC$1,000
PAROISSE SAINT-DENIS-SUR-RICHELIEUC$602
MEDITATION CHRÉTIENNE (MCQRFC)C$500
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 86% of grant dollars (C$150k). The 14% that went abroad (C$24k) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 14% of all-years giving (C$24k)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$97k · 29 repeat orgsC$77k to everyone else

29 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 19 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
51

Total granted

C$97k
C$42k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+47%

Still filing today

79%
22%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 50% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AVRDI ( ASS. VALLÉE DU RICHELIEU DÉFIENCE INTELLECTUELLE)
    5× · 2018–2024 · C$23k · revenue +41%
  • LM
    LA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DE LA VALLÉE-DU-RICHELIEU
    2× · 2019–2024 · C$21k · revenue +58%
  • FL
    FONDATION L'INTERMÈDE
    3× · 2017–2023 · C$16k · revenue +104%

Funded once

  • FP
    FONDATION PARTAGE VALLÉE DU RICHELIEUgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · C$15k · revenue +757%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · C$3k
  • CD
    Coopérative de solidarité santé de la rive
    one grant, 2018 · C$2k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme
—
2
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire
—
3
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Victoire
—
4
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix
—
5
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Viateur
—
6
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Tres-Saint-Redempteur
—
7
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain
—
8
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Famille
—
9
La Fabrique De La Paroisse Sainte-Marguerite
—
10
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Marcel (L'islet)
—
11
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue
—
12
La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Edouard
—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fondation Partage Vallee-Du-Richelieu and the most unlike its peers is Comité de parents BÉMol. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

37 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 37 of the 89 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/37
Grantees still filing
27/37
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetAVRDI ( ASS. VALLÉE DU RICHELIEU DÉFIENCE INTELLECTUELLE) — C$23,267 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetLA MAISON DE LA FAMILLE DE LA VALLÉE-DU-RICHELIEU — C$21,235 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetFONDATION L'INTERMÈDE — C$15,700 over 3y, 2.9% of budget21EGROUPE SCOUT BELOEIL — C$8,109 over 2y, 10% of budgetFONDATION L'INTERMÈDE — C$3,508 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMaison Victor-Gadbois — C$2,700 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetL'Arche de Beloeil — C$2,520 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetPAROISSE TRINITÉ-SUR-RICHELIEU — C$1,825 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSociété Canadienne du Cancer — C$1,550 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CHARLES-BRUNEAU — C$1,351 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION SOURCE BLEUE — C$1,350 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAROISSE SAINT MARC SUR RICHELIEU — C$1,255 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetFONDATION DU DIOCÈSE DE SAINT HYACINTHE — C$1,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAssemblée Chanoine-Jules-Girard — C$1,020 over 1y, 5.8% of budgetMOISSON RIVE SUD — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFondation Martin Giard — C$1,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetMEDITATION CHRÉTIENNE (MCQRFC) — C$1,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetFONDATION ALINE LETENDRE — C$994 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MAISON L'ALCÔVE — C$850 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFondation Mira — C$850 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetParoisse Notre-Dame-du-Bon-Conseil — C$805 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetFondation CHU Sainte-Justine — C$750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPAROISSE SAINT-DENIS-SUR-RICHELIEU — C$707 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCamp Richelieu de St-Hyacinthe — C$700 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFondation Clé sur la Porte — C$700 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFONDATION CLÉ SUR LA PORTE — C$700 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetLE PHARE — C$600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetParoisse St-Hilaire — C$555 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFONDATION MAISON L'ALCÔVE — C$550 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetL'ASSOCIATION DES CHEVALIERS BÉNÉVOLES DE L'HÔTEL-DIEU DU ST — C$500 over 1y, 8.5% of budgetCENTRE DE FEMMES L'ESSENTIELLE — C$250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLes ensembles musicaux du Mont-St-Hilaire — C$250 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetA.P.H.V.R. — C$175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPAROISSE SAINT CHARLES SUR RICHELIEU — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION DES TRAUMATISÉS CRANIO-CÉRÉRAUX DE LA MONTÉRÉGI — C$150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPAROISE SAINT JEAN BAPTISTE — C$105 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Oeuvres de mère Émili…Oeuvres Regis-VernetCentraide Richelieu-Y…Sjsh - District Du Ca…Fondation Des Soeurs …Comité des Oeuvres Ch…Comite Des Oeuvres Ch…Soeurs de la Presenta…Les Oeuvres des Relig…Fondation Famille Laf…Fondation Pilleniere …Fondation St-Hubert
Oeuvres de mère Émilie-JauronQC20.9× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Oeuvres de mère Émilie-Jauron · Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · Centraide Richelieu-Yamaska inc. · Sjsh - District Du Canada · Fondation Des Soeurs de Saint-Joseph de Saint-Hyacinthe · Comité des Oeuvres Charitables du Conseil Ste-Rosalie 9803 · Comite Des Oeuvres Charitables Du Conseil Ste-Madeleine No. 4301 · Soeurs de la Presentation de Marie Du Quebec · Les Oeuvres des Religieuses Adoratrices du Précieux Sang · Fondation Famille Lafond · Fondation Pilleniere Inc · Fondation St-Hubert

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 89 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-06-30, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 885505982:2024-06-30 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Comité des oeuvres charitables du conseil beloeil 2905’s filings →