How much did Oeuvres de mère Émilie-Jauron grant in FY2024?

Oeuvres de mère Émilie-Jauron reported 60 grants totaling C$1,896,000 in its FY2024 T3010 return.

Where is Oeuvres de mère Émilie-Jauron based?

Oeuvres de mère Émilie-Jauron is based in SAINT-HYACINTHE, QC.

Canadian charities Mostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →

Saint-Hyacinthe, QC · Public foundation

Oeuvres de mère Émilie-Jauron

Aider des oeuvres de bienfaisance ayant des fins religieuses charitables éducatives et sociales dans le but de perpétuer le charisme et la tradition de la congrégation religieuse des soeurs de la charité de saint-hyacinthe et de poursuivre les oeuvres de la congrégation selon l'esprit de charité qui animait sa co-fondatrice mère…

C$1.9M

Granted FY2024still arriving

Grants FY2024still arriving

Regions reached

C$325k

Largest

01What you fundRead

02Your edgeRead

03Your fieldRead

01What you fund

01FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under C$10k17 grants · C$75k
C$10k–50k32 grants · C$603k
C$50k–250k10 grants · C$894k
C$250k+1 grant · C$325k

C$15,000

Median grant

Regions reached

C$37M

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
LE CENTRE DE BÉNÉVOLAT DE SAINT-HYACINTHE INC.	C$325,000
CENTRAIDE RICHELIEU-YAMASKA INC.	C$200,000
LA MOISSON MASKOUTAINE	C$135,000
FONDATION L'INTERNÈDE	C$100,000
LA PETITE FERME DE L'AUBERGE	C$100,000
COMPTOIR-PARTAGE LA MIE	C$70,000
FONDATION HONORÉ-MERCIER	C$70,000
FONDATION ALINE LETENDRE	C$60,000
FONDATION MAISON L'ALCÔVE	C$55,000
VILLE DE SAINT-HYACINTHE	C$53,500
LES GRANDS FRÈRES ET LES GRANDES SOEURS DE LA MONTÉRÉGIE	C$50,000
CAMP RICHELIEU DE ST-HYACINTHE	C$40,000
PARTAGE NOTRE-DAME	C$35,000
FONDATION SOURCE BLEUE	C$30,000
LA FONDATION MARTIN-GIARD	C$30,000

02Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

C$7.5M · 103 repeat orgsC$289k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

103 repeat relationships — 56 still active in FY2024, 47 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103

Total granted

C$7.5M

C$209k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%

+18%

Still filing today

94%

79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$81k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

CR
CENTRAIDE RICHELIEU-YAMASKA INC.
8× · 2017–2024 · C$610k · revenue +36%
CL
COMPTOIR-PARTAGE LA MIE
8× · 2017–2024 · C$454k · revenue +120% · 30% of their budget
FH
FONDATION HONORÉ-MERCIER
7× · 2018–2024 · C$420k · revenue +76%

Funded once

LC
LE CENTRE D'INTERVENTION-JEUNESSE DES MASKOUTgraduated
one grant, 2020 · C$35k · revenue +151%
FD
FABRIQUE DE LA PAROISSE ST-EPHREM D'UPTON
one grant, 2021 · C$25k · revenue -27%
CL
CPE LES COQUELIOTS
one grant, 2019 · C$23k · revenue +18%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Adelme

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-CÉSaire

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse Du Tres-Saint-Redempteur

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse Sainte-Marguerite

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse Saint-Antoine-De-Padoue

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Angelique

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De St-Germain

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Croix

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Antonin

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Sainte-Victoire

—

La Fabrique De La Paroisse De Saint-Edouard

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Le centre de bénévolat de St-Hyacinthe inc. and the most unlike its peers is Le Verbe médias. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

130 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 130 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

124/130

Grantees still filing

97/130

Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Soeurs de la Presentation de Marie Du QuebecQC47.1× affinity51 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Soeurs de la Presentation de Marie Du Quebec · Oeuvres Regis-Vernet · Sjsh - District Du Canada · Fondation Des Soeurs de Saint-Joseph de Saint-Hyacinthe · Centraide Richelieu-Yamaska inc. · Les Oeuvres des Religieuses Adoratrices du Précieux Sang · Religieuses Adoratrices Du Précieux Sang de Saint-Hyacinthe · L'Abbaye de Saint-Benoit-Du-Lac · Comité des oeuvres charitables du conseil beloeil 2905 · Institut Des Soeurs de Sainte-Marthe de Saint-Hyacinthe · Les Petites Soeurs de la Sainte-Famille · Fondation Famille Benoit

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Play a game based on Oeuvres de mère Émilie-Jauron’s filings →