Churchbridge, SK · Public foundation
Churchbridge and District Donors Choice
We did a mail drop to all church bridge mail boxes - donations were mailed in to the treasurer.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TOWN OF CHURCH BRIDGE | C$3,045 |
| CANADIAN CANCER SOCIETY | C$367 |
| HEART & STROKE FDT. | C$340 |
| STARS | C$295 |
| CANADIAN DIABETES | C$272 |
| JIM PATUEOR CHILDRENS HOSPITAL | C$202 |
| GOOD SPIRIT SCHOOL RIN | C$202 |
| SASK DEAF & HARD OF HEARING | C$150 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | C$150 |
| LANG ASSOC. | C$145 |
| FAMILY & FRIENDS COMMUNITY FDT | C$145 |
| HEALTH FDT. & EAST CENTRAL SASK | C$140 |
| THE KIDNEY FDT | C$137 |
| HERITAGE CEMETARIES PROJECT | C$130 |
| SALVATION ARMY | C$125 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
40 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2023, 20 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$170 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- CCCanadian Cancer Society4× · 2017–2023 · C$8k · revenue +6%
- GSGOOD SPIRIT SCHOOL DIVISION3× · 2018–2023 · C$5k · revenue +12%
- SASalvation Army4× · 2017–2023 · C$3k · revenue +495%
Funded once
- CRCanadian Red Crossone grant, 2017 · C$818
- JPJim Pattison Childrens Hospital Fdt.one grant, 2017 · C$100
- OHOur House Six Steps Recoveryone grant, 2018 · C$100
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We provide information and support to Scleroderma patients and their families. We promote awareness of Scleroderma to Doctors and the general public. We raise money for medical research of Scleroderma. We provide money for Scleroderma…
We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…
We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…
The saskatchewan cancer agency provided leadership in cancer control for the people of saskatchewan through prevention early detection treatment and research
The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…
Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…
Funding of diabetes research
Advancing the health of Canadians by enabling the detection prevention and control of high blood pressure and its complications. Hypertension Canada delivers against its mission/vision by striving for excellence in three core service…
Provide information and support to families and care-partners affected by psp msa and cbd. collaborate with healthcare professionals to increase awareness and improve treatment. fund research leveraging partnerships with other charitable…
In Canada researchers figure prominently in the development of innovative and very promising clinical trials. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) is the first and only national organization bringing together Canada's leading cancer…
research
MUSCULAR DYSTROPHY CANADA (MDC) provides direct support to Canadians affected by Neuromuscular disorders that include: offering emotional support for adapting and coping to Canadians living with a neuromuscular disorder or caring for an…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Cancer Foundation of Saskatchewan Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Our House Six Steps Drug Recovery Corporation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 49 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Canadian Cancer Society ↗
- Who funds GOOD SPIRIT SCHOOL DIVISION ↗
- Who funds Canadian Diabetes Assoc. ↗
- Who funds Salvation Army ↗
- Who funds Heritage Cemetaries Project ↗
- Who funds Arthritis Society ↗
- Who funds STARS ↗
- Who funds Friends of Sask Children Inc. (Ronald MacDonald House) ↗
- Who funds Canadian Red Cross ↗
- Who funds The Kidney Fdt of Canada ↗
- Who funds Lung Assoc. of Sask. ↗
- Who funds Juvenile Diabetes Fdt ↗
- Who funds Crohns and Colitis Fdt. of Canada ↗
- Who funds Canadian Bible Society ↗
- Who funds Family and Friends Community Fdt. ↗
- Who funds Sask Deaf & Hard of Hearing ↗
- Who funds Langenburg & District Activity Crt ↗
- Who funds Multiple Sclerosis of Soc. Of Canada ↗
- Who funds HEALTH FOUUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL SASK. ↗
- Who funds Canadian Paraplegic Assoc. (Sask.) Inc. ↗
- Who funds JIM PATTISON CHILDRENS HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Women in Need ↗
- Who funds Sask. Abilities Council ↗
- Who funds C N I B ↗
- Who funds Sask Pro Life (Education Trust) Fdt ↗
- Who funds Osteoporsis Canada ↗
- Who funds Gideon International in Canada ↗
- Who funds Our House 6 Step Recovery Program ↗
- Who funds Sask. Assoc. of Community Living ↗
- Who funds Churchbridge Daycare Cooperative ↗
- Who funds Canadian Cystic Fibrosis Fdt ↗
- Who funds CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: United Way of Saskatoon and Area · United Way of Regina · Langenburg & District Donors Choice Combined Appeal · Carlyle and District Donors Choice · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · Family & Friends Community Foundation Inc. · Sasktel Telcare Employees Charity Trust · Elbow & Community Donors Choice Organization · The Maryfield and District Donor's Choice · Abernethy and District Donors Choice · Tantallon and District Donors Choice Corporation · Gainsborough and District Donor's Choice
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.