Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

Tantallon, SK · Charitable organization

Tantallon and District Donors Choice Corporation

To collect funds from donators and send it to organizations through donors choice.

C$4k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
Regions reached
C$2k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02Your edgeRead
03Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

C$73
Median grant
3
Regions reached
C$238
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TANTALLON REC CO-OPERATIVEC$1,823
Individual grant recipientC$833
ST ANTHONYS HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONC$558
HOSPITALS OF REGINA-NEO NATALC$168
SASK HEART FOUNDATIONC$168
CANCER SOCIETY SASK DIVISIONC$130
CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATIONC$105
Individual grant recipientC$98
MOOSOMIN & DISTRICT HEALTH CARE FOUNDATIONC$80
SALVATION ARMYC$73
STARS SASKC$55
DIABETIS ASSOC SASK DIVISIONC$32
Individual grant recipientC$25
CROHN'S & COLITIS CANADAC$25
LUNG ASSOCIATION OF SASKC$20
02Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

68%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$49k · 33 repeat orgsC$23k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against -6% for the ones you funded once.

33 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2024, 15 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
16

Total granted

C$49k
C$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
-6%

Still filing today

58%
6%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    STARS AMBULANCE
    6× · 2019–2024 · C$2k · revenue +23%
  • HO
    HOSPITALS OF REGINA
    8× · 2017–2024 · C$2k · revenue +78%
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY
    7× · 2018–2024 · C$2k · revenue ×22

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · C$7k
  • TM
    TANTALLON MEMORIAL REC COOP.
    one grant, 2021 · C$5k
  • TM
    TANTALLON MEMORIAL RECREATIONAL CO-OP LTD.
    one grant, 2019 · C$5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

03Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Saskatchewan Health Authority

The Saskatchewan Health Authority (SHA) is responsible for the delivery of high quality and timely health care for all the people across the province. The SHA has approximately 40 000 employees and 2 770 physicians who provide services to…

—
2
Saskatoon Regional Health Authority

We operate a health delivery system providing a full range of health care services to residents of the Saskatoon Health Region and other residents of Saskatchewan. Services are provided in hospitals, long-term care facilities, primary…

—
3
Scleroderma Association of Saskatchewan

We provide information and support to Scleroderma patients and their families. We promote awareness of Scleroderma to Doctors and the general public. We raise money for medical research of Scleroderma. We provide money for Scleroderma…

—
4
Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation

We run funding competitions that provide: 1. Grants to new university faculty members to start their health research programs; 2. Grants for advanced research training in health areas;; 3. Support for Researchers to exchange ideas and work…

—
5
Alberta Spine Foundation

The objective of the asf is to advance the delivery of spine care in alberta through innovative clinical care focused education and academic collaboration.

—
6
Cancer Foundation of Saskatchewan Inc.

The foundation obtained it’s registered charity status on may 14 2018. the foundation's mission is to raise funds to support the cancer needs of the people of saskatchewan. as the fundraising partner for the saskatchewan cancer agency the…

—
7
Alberta Foundation for Health Research

Alberta foundation for health research supports health research projects that are provinvial in scope which impact and originate but are beyond the scope of alberta innovates - health solutions

—
8
Ovarian Cancer Canada/Cancer De L'ovaire Canada

Research: Investing in pan-Canadian and patient-centered research across the full continuum of ovarian cancer from prevention to diagnosis to treatment to survivorship. Our research investments are enabling discoveries by establishing and…

—
9
Alberta Cancer Foundation

The alberta cancer foundation provides funds for cancer research the prevention detection education and diagnosis of cancer and for the treatment and care of cancer patients within alberta.

—
10
The Royal Alexandra Hospital Foundation

The Royal Alexandra Hospital Foundation raises and manages funds to advance and support the Royal Alexandra Hospital Alberta Health Services and post-secondary institutions in Edmonton Alberta. Enhancement includes the funding of equipment…

—
11
Canadian Myeloma Research Group

In Canada researchers figure prominently in the development of innovative and very promising clinical trials. The Canadian Myeloma Research Group (CMRG) is the first and only national organization bringing together Canada's leading cancer…

—
12
Royal University Hospital Foundation Inc.

Provide funds raised to Saskatchewan Health Authority for capital construction capital equipment staff education and scholarships fellowships patient care and research within Royal University Hospital. Provide funds raised to the…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Societe De L'arthrite Du Canada and the most unlike its peers is 489520 Alberta Ltd.. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

02the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 51 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetANGELS OF HOPE — C$2,643 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetCROHN'S & COLITIS OF CANADA — C$2,040 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSTARS AMBULANCE — C$1,915 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPITALS OF REGINA — C$1,859 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSALVATION ARMY — C$1,578 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetCancer Society Sask. Division — C$1,210 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOC. — C$1,079 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetST ANTHONYS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — C$916 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetALLAN BLAIR CANCER CENTRE — C$816 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetHEALTH FOUNDATION OF EAST SASK. — C$609 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLung Association of Saskatchewan — C$470 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMERS & RELATED DISEASES — C$415 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetM.S. Society of Canada — C$285 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCANADIAN DIABETIS ASSOC. OF SASK. — C$261 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetARTHRITIS SOCIETY — C$240 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDRENS WISH FOUNDATION — C$174 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTeddy Bears Annonymous — C$144 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSONS CANADA — C$72 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOsteoporosis Canada — C$57 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARAPLEGIC ASSOCIATION — C$50 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetALS OF CANADA — C$47 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ANGELS OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds CROHN'S & COLITIS OF CANADA ↗
  • Who funds STARS AMBULANCE ↗
  • Who funds HOSPITALS OF REGINA ↗
  • Who funds SALVATION ARMY ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Society Sask. Division ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN MENTAL HEALTH ASSOC. ↗
  • Who funds ST ANTHONYS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLAN BLAIR CANCER CENTRE ↗
  • Who funds HEALTH FOUNDATION OF EAST SASK. ↗
  • Who funds Lung Association of Saskatchewan ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMERS & RELATED DISEASES ↗
  • Who funds M.S. Society of Canada ↗
  • Who funds CANADIAN DIABETIS ASSOC. OF SASK. ↗
  • Who funds ARTHRITIS SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDRENS WISH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Teddy Bears Annonymous ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Outlook Donors ChoiceUnited Way of ReginaCarlyle and District …Churchbridge and Dist…United Way of Saskato…Elbow & Community Don…Milestone Donors Choi…Edam and District Don…Sasktel Telcare Emplo…Saskatchewan Communit…Lemberg & District Do…Milden and District C…
Outlook Donors ChoiceSK12.4× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Outlook Donors Choice · United Way of Regina · Carlyle and District Donors Choice · Churchbridge and District Donors Choice · United Way of Saskatoon and Area · Elbow & Community Donors Choice Organization · Milestone Donors Choice Combined Appeal · Edam and District Donors Choice Combined Appeal Committee · Sasktel Telcare Employees Charity Trust · Saskatchewan Community Foundation Corp. · Lemberg & District Donors Choice · Milden and District Combined Appeal Donors Choice

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 51 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a charitable organization under foundations.

Source object 119208585:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on Tantallon and District Donors Choice’s filings →