Langenburg, SK · Public foundation
Family & Friends Community Foundation Inc.
Providing leadership in community giving and ensuring the building of sufficient capital to assure the long-term benefit of the community.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under C$10k11 grants · C$44k
- C$10k–50k2 grants · C$28k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | C$17,849 |
| SUNRISE REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY | C$10,359 |
| GOOD SPIRIT DIVISION NO. 204 | C$9,892 |
| CANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWAN | C$8,750 |
| LANGENBURG ARTS COUNCIL | C$6,500 |
| TOWN OF CHURCHBRIDGE | C$5,280 |
| CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH LANGENBURG | C$4,264 |
| VILLAGE OF SPY HILL | C$2,549 |
| LANGENBURG DAYCARE CO-OPERATIVE | C$2,416 |
| LANGENBURG UNITED CHURCH | C$2,043 |
| HERITAGE CEMETERIES | C$1,783 |
| CHURCHBRIDGE DAYCARE CO-OPERATIVE | C$600 |
| ST. PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH OF LANGENBURG | C$325 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
15 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$0 went to new ones.
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”
Backed again, and grew
- GSGood Spirit School Division No. 2048× · 2017–2024 · C$62k · revenue +8%
- LALANGENBURG ARTS COUNCIL8× · 2017–2024 · C$23k · revenue +6%
- LDLAGENBURG DAYCARE CO-OPERATIVE6× · 2018–2024 · C$21k · revenue +98%
Funded once
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · C$47k
- LDLangenburg Daycare Co-operativeone grant, 2017 · C$4k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2021 · C$2k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide financial assistance to band students in order for them to attend various band camps and clinics. Encourage young students to further their music education and to support festivals in the area.
Lunenburg heritage society lists to promote lunenburg's unique heritage and to tell the story of its culture social and economic development. it operates the knaut rhuland house museum (a national historic site.)
Provision of childcare services
Fund raising activities in saskatchewan to support the mission of lutheran sunset home of saskatoon to provide excellence in care shelter and support in a nurturing christian environment.
Elkhorn early learning center provides day care in lud of elkhorn and surrounding area.
Raise funds for the maintenance and repair of the lunenburg academy and the surrounding property.
Operates a public swimming pool for the benefits of the citizens of the town of lunenburg nova scotia and the surrounding areas.
Financially support the fishermen's memorial hospital and the south shore regional hospital plus associated sites within lunenburg county by raising funds to enhance and improve the quality of health care services and equipment.
Providing and maintenance of facilities to support charitable activities at langs farm village association
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Langenburg & District Activity Centre Inc. and the most unlike its peers is Sunrise Regional Health Authority. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.
Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SUNRISE REGIONAL HEALTH AUTHORITY ↗
- Who funds Good Spirit School Division No. 204 ↗
- Who funds LANGENBURG ARTS COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds LAGENBURG DAYCARE CO-OPERATIVE ↗
- Who funds CHRIST LUTHERAN CHURCH LANGENBURG ↗
- Who funds CANCER FOUNDATION OF SASKATCHEWAN ↗
- Who funds THE HEALTH FOUNDATION OF EAST CENTRAL SASKATCHEWAN INC. ↗
- Who funds LANGENBURG UNITED CHURCH ↗
- Who funds LANGENBURG & DISTRICT ACTIVITY CENTRE ↗
- Who funds HERITAGE CEMETERIES ↗
- Who funds ST. PAUL'S LUTHERAN CHURCH OF LANGENBURG ↗
- Who funds CHURCHBRIDGE DAYCARE CO-OPERATIVE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Churchbridge and District Donors Choice · Langenburg & District Donors Choice Combined Appeal · Canadian Online Giving Foundation/Fondation canadienne de dons en ligne
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.