Skip to content
Canadian charitiesAlso receives grants — funding profile →

North York, ON · Private foundation

CDS Family Foundation

Advancement of religion

C$777k
Granted FY2024still arriving
20
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
Regions reached
C$677k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01FY2024 · 20 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under C$10k16 grants · C$13k
  • C$10k–50k2 grants · C$31k
  • C$50k–250k1 grant · C$56k
  • C$250k+1 grant · C$677k
C$250
Median grant
1
Regions reached
C$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
KOLLEL DAF YOMIC$677,130
BAIS YAAKOVC$56,200
BETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOLC$17,250
YESHODEI HATORAHC$13,280
AGUDATH ISRAELC$7,994
JEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATIONC$2,352
KAV SHALOMC$500
SMALL WONDERSC$360
ECHOC$360
BOBOVC$250
A.B/CC$250
TORONTO SHIDDUCHC$180
TORONTO MIKVAC$180
AGUDAH PRICHEIC$175
RCCSC$100
02The need
02

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Where your grant dollars land — at home and around the world.

Your giving at home — 23% of grant dollars (C$374k). The 77% that went abroad (C$1.3M) is mapped below.

Beyond home — 77% of all-years giving (C$1.3M)

0 countries, by the recipient’s country on the filing.

grant dollars sentlessmore

International giving is mapped by the recipient’s country from the same T3010 filings; comparable need data isn’t available at that grain.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

10%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
C$161k · 10 repeat orgsC$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +27% since the first grant, against +11% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
13

Total granted

C$161k
C$785k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+11%

Still filing today

100%
62%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 10% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; C$696k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.”

Backed again, and grew

  • BY
    BAIS YAAKOV
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$110k · revenue +31%
  • YY
    YESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$29k · revenue +25%
  • AI
    AGUDATH ISRAEL
    2× · 2022–2024 · C$14k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · C$538k
  • KD
    KOLLEL DAF YOMIgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · C$175k · revenue +68%
  • F1
    FX @ 1.3013
    one grant, 2022 · C$53k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent CRA filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matches that aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Yeshivas Oholei Menachem Mendel Lubavitch

To establish an orthodox jewish high school for boys devoted to the study of the laws tenets and doctrines of the jewish faith.

—
2
Yeshiva Ateres Yisroel

Operated an orthodox jewish high school geared to students who need and would benefit from individual attention not available in existing orthodox jewish high schools.

—
3
Tiferes Bais Yaakov

The charity operates a religious high school of instruction for jewish girls

—
4
Yeshiva Torah Temimah

The school educates high-school age male students in both secular and jewish studies in a non-conventional way offering more attention than normal to each student.

—
5
The Institute of Torah Education

The institute of torah education advances religion by teaching students doctrines observances and culture associated with the orthodox jewish faith.

—
6
Institute for Advanced Talmudic and Halachic Studies

Established and operated as an institution of jewish training and education particularly in the fields of rabbinic talmudic halachic studies.

—
7
Torah Research Academy

To promote precepts of orthodox judaism and training of rabbinic leaders

—
8
Kollel Toldos Yakov Yosef
—
9
Alumni Association of Yeshivatkol Torah

To provide scholarships and assistance to indigent sutudents enrolled in post secondary education in yeshivat kol torah in israel.

—
10
Association Merkaz Hachinuch

To provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses at belz yeshiva

—
11
Jewish Heritage Foundation International

Provide scholarships and assistance to deserving students to continue their religious courses given at mosdos gur in jerusalem israel.

—
12
Yeshivah Toras Chaim

The charity provides scholarships and assistance to needy students to enable them to study at yeshiva toras chalm

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Talmudical Academy of Toronto Mishkan HaTorah Charitable Trust and the most unlike its peers is Abc - Assisting Blossoming Children. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

03the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2024.

Each one resolved to its own CRA returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2024, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/27
Grantees still filing
15/27
Grew since you first funded

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%C$100kC$1.0MC$10MC$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetKOLLEL DAF YOMI — C$175,457 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBAIS YAAKOV — C$110,450 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetYESHIVA YESODEI HATORAH — C$29,330 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBETH JACOB HIGH SCHOOL — C$17,250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL — C$14,209 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetJEWISH HERITAGE FOUNDATION — C$3,188 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOC - CHEVRA OSEH CHESED — C$1,800 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetYESHIVA NACHALAS ZVI — C$1,144 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYESHIVA GEDOAH ZICHRON SHMARYAHU — C$1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSMALL WONDERS — C$720 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetECHO — C$720 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetA.B.C. — C$500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetKAV SHALOM — C$500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKOLLEL CHIBATH YERUCSHALIM — C$500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMISHKAN HATOARAH — C$360 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO SHIDDUCH — C$360 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOBOV — C$250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTORONTO MIKVA — C$180 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAGUDAH PRICHEI — C$175 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPATHS OF TORAH — C$104 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEGINI CHANA — C$100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTORONTO CHEDER — C$54 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVMM — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGUDATH ISRAEL CEMETARY — C$50 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNER ISRAEL — C$50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Zolty Charitable Foun…The S & L Stern Found…The Chaim Moshe Fried…479 FoundationThe Dov Zimmerman Z'L…The Anisfeld Charitab…Mae Day FoundationThe Daniel and Vera R…The Weitz Family Foun…The George Hofstedter…Mitzvah Charity FundThe Grubner Family Ch…
Zolty Charitable FoundationON15.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Zolty Charitable Foundation · The S & L Stern Foundation · The Chaim Moshe Friedman Memorial Fund · 479 Foundation · The Dov Zimmerman Z'L Foundation · The Anisfeld Charitable Trust · Mae Day Foundation · The Daniel and Vera Rubinstein Charitable Foundation · The Weitz Family Foundation · The George Hofstedter Family Foundation · Mitzvah Charity Fund · The Grubner Family Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from the Canada Revenue Agency’s published T3010 data — your own annual information return and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year) — each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program description on its T3010; we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without a BN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your T3010 annual information return for the fiscal period ending 2024-12-31, as published by the Canada Revenue Agency in 2024. Amounts are Canadian dollars, as filed and never converted. Registered as a private foundation under foundations advancing religion.

Source object 797469301:2024-12-31 · View the T3010 on the CRA register

Play a game based on CDS Family’s filings →